Jump to Navigation
Home

Main menu

  • Home
  • Latest Stories
  • Markets Map
  • Trends and Sentiments
  • Leading Topics
  • News Search
  • Comments and Analysis

Secondary menu

  • Latest News
  • Top Rated
  • Most Popular
  • Archive
  • About Us
  • If 1 In 5 Jobs Is 'Displaced' Due To Automation...
  • Here are the biggest revelations from Comey's memos
  • At Cycle Turn, Fed Can Follow 2 Possible Paths
  • 'Pre-monsoon' rains threaten Rohingya refugees
  • Authers’ Note: Wages of sin
  • Government bond markets steady in wake of sell-off
  • Buffett exits at pivotal moment for Kraft Heinz
  • Erdogan hopes to cement his legacy with snap elections
  • Elkann wants to bring back energy of roaring 50s
  • What the offices of 1970s corporate America tell us about...

    CBO Gives Us the Key to Health-Care Reform: The Employer Mandate

    Thu, 07/02/2009 - 11:24 EDT - Ezra Klein - Washington Post
    • Comments
    • Health Reform

    PH2009062302975.jpg

    The big news of the morning is a new version of the Senate HELP Committee's health-care reform bill that seems to have everyone confused. The short version is this: CBO estimates that by 2019 the bill will cover 21 million people at a cost of $597 billion. But -- and this is important -- the HELP Committee's bill doesn't include the Medicaid expansion, because Medicaid is under the sole jurisdiction of the Finance Committee. But if Medicaid is expanded to 150 percent, it will cover an additional 20 million at a cost of about $1 trillion. Add in the savings that Finance is expected to get from reforming Medicare and you're looking at a bill that will cost $1 trillion to $1.3 trillion and cover 42 million people (which would mean 97 percent of the legal population in 2019 would have health insurance) by 2019.

    The importance of this set of numbers can be understood only in terms of the catastrophe that was the last set of numbers. On June 15, the Congressional Budget Office scored an incomplete version of this bill. The office estimated that it would cost $1 trillion over 10 years and cover 16 million people. It would've cost, in other words, 70 percent more and covered 20 percent fewer people. The big question, then, is what accounts for the change? And luckily, there's a simple answer: the employer mandate.

    The June 15th proposal didn't include an employer mandate. And without one, the news was grim: Employers would drop coverage for 15 million employees and send them to the Health Insurance Exchange where they would need government subsidies to afford health insurance. That meant costs exploded and coverage contracted. Health reform looked like a bum deal.

    But oh, what a difference a mandate makes: The new version of the HELP bill includes an employer mandate for firms with more than 25 workers. Every full-time worker who isn't given health-care coverage triggers a penalty of $750. Every part-time employee not given coverage costs $375. Doesn't seem like very much, does it? But it's enough. In Massachusetts, the employer mandate has been a success with a piddling $295 penalty. Indeed, the evidence we have suggests that the small penalty creates a massive change in behavior.

    And you see the result in CBO's latest score. The June 15 report estimated that 15 million Americans would lose their employer-based coverage under HELP's bill. Today's report estimates that a mere 150,000 will lose their coverage. That's nothing. And it means that a lot more Americans end up insured and the government spends a lot less in subsidies.

    I'll have much more on other provisions of the bill later. But the overarching lesson of these CBO reports is simple: You can't do health-care reform -- at least not this kind of health-care reform -- without an employer mandate.

    For more: See Jon Cohn's guide for the perplexed.

    Photo credit: AP Photo/Harry Hamburg.

    • Original article
    • Login to post comments
     

    Related

    • CBO Scores Complete HELP Bill and the News is Good

    • Health Care Reform in Danger

    • The CBO's Assumptions

      Yesterday, the Congressional Budget Office returned a fairly devastating estimate of Sens. Ted Kennedy (D-Mass.) and Chris Dodd's (D-Conn.) Affordable Health Choices Act. According to the agency, the bill would cost a hefty trillion dollars over 10 years and extend insurance to a mere 16 million people. That's a lot of money to spend if you're only going to achieve a third of your goal. Frankly, I was pretty surprised by the results.

    • The Congressional Budget Office Looks at Ted Kennedy's Bill And Finds Disappointing Numbers And a Very Bad Idea

      The Congressional Budget Office's preliminary analysis of Sen. Ted Kennedy's Affordable Health Choices Act is out.

    • How big is the bill, really?

      We should start by putting the health-care bill into proper perspective. Opponents and supports of the bill have both profited immensely from exploiting the average person's inability to but billions and trillions into context. So let's begin by breaking down the numbers.

    • Putting the health-care bill into perspective

      This column originally appeared in the Sunday business section. Also, I'm off today for Martin Luther King Jr. Day. Regularly blogging resumes tomorrow.

    • House health-care bill likely to cover more, cost families less, than Senate bill

    • Meet the New Health-Care System, Not That Different From the Old Health-Care System

    • The Finance Committee's "Comprehensive Incrementalism"

    • Coverage and Cost

      I'm a bit baffled by Michael Kinsley's column this morning on the need to go for the "low-hanging fruit" in health-care reform. This graf, for instance, doesn't work on two levels:

    Latest

    Here are the biggest revelations from Comey's memos
    Here are the biggest revelations from Comey'...
    Trump went into extraordinary detail on his pitch to put reporters in jail over leaks
    Trump went into extraordinary detail on his pitch...

    Markets Map

    Markets Map

    Follow Us

    Follow Us on Facebook, Twitter, Google Plus and RSS LinkedIn Facebook Twitter Google Plus RSS
    S&P 500: 2579.37 0.16% FTSE: 7487.96 -0.07% Nikk.: 22420.08 1.82% DAX: 13465.51 1.75% HSI: 28594.06 1.22% FX: EUR/GBP: 1.1401 USD/EUR: 1.1618 JPY/USD: 114.1510 Commodities: Gold: 1276.1000

    Bullfax.com - Market News & Analysis 2008-2011
    Contact Us | About Us | Terms & Conditions

    Follow Us on Facebook, Twitter, Google Plus and RSS LinkedIn Facebook Twitter Google Plus RSS .

    Secondary menu

    • Latest News
    • Top Rated
    • Most Popular
    • Archive
    • About Us