Kindle and DRM

 

After reading this post, I realize I don't understand my status quo DRM rights with Kindle.  That's not a good sign.  I did notice this sentence, which I didn't feel the need to parse any further:
Here is the major problem with this scenario.
As a reader, I find it good policy to keep the number of books on my Kindle to below twenty.  That forces me to read the ones I order and it also protects me from "stranded" consumer durables.  Uncertainty and confusion about my rights only strengthens my desire to keep that policy. 
As a writer, I expect the Kindle is temporarily in my financial self-interest, as it gets more "influentials" reading my work and perhaps talking it up.  In the longer run I suspect it means a lower equilibrium price for books.  One question is whether publishers use "sticky" or inconvenient DRM practices as an implicit collusive method for limiting the spread of Kindle.
Today I was struck by this passage about the origins of Netflix:

Netflix's selection of more than 100,000 DVD rental titles is made possible by the "first-sale doctrine" of U.S. copyright law, which permits buyers of DVDs to lend them out without studios' consent.
In Netflix's early days, its buying team would sometimes purchase DVDs at local Wal-Marts or Best Buys if it couldn't get copies through studios, says Ted Sarandos, Netflix's chief content officer.
In contrast, to deliver movies and television shows over the Internet, Netflix has to license them from studios. So far, it has gotten only about 12,000 titles, a hodgepodge of older films such as "Diehard," episodes of popular TV shows including "30 Rock" and a smattering of new releases.
That's right, we had more innovation because some of the usual copyright strictures about negotiating rights did not apply.  I am pro-copyright, but once again the default settings make it too hard for successful negotiations to occur.

Related

  • That's the excellent bagel and smoked fish shop at 3rd Ave., just north of 50th St. I order my bagel from a gentleman with a thick New York accent and he eyes me suspiciously.  Finally he grunts out, in a tone slightly less than that of accusation: Server: "Where are you from?"

  • Chug asks me: Tyler, do you scrawl notes in the margins of the books you read?

  • Michael Weintraub asks: What are your favorite songs about technology? In my own thinking I have limited the universe of cases to those whose lyrics deal explicitly with technological innovations and their cultural effects, along the lines of Paul Simon's "Boy in the Bubble" or the Talking Heads' "(Nothing But) Flowers."

  •  Let's say you are a Republican policymaker and you already contradict yourself by a) "we can afford to extend the Bush tax cuts" and b) "we can't afford the current version of Social Security" not to mention c) "tax cuts for business are good."  Do you still favor both a) and c)?  And what if you have to pile on d) "Everything Obama proposes is bad" and yet c) leads you to e) "we should defund the very system which we can no longer afford"?  What comes out at the end?  I am curious.

  • Political jobs would be torture for most people.  You have no freedom.  You are underpaid and over-bugged.  You lose a lot of your privacy.  You have to stop writing emails or saying what you think.  You don't get to read many good books or go for many quiet walks.  It's hard to be a non-conformist.  And so on. Yet it's really hard to get top political jobs.  So who gets them?  People who truly, deeply love the power.

  • What are the exact conditions for counting "transhumanism" as having been attained?  Would you rather have a worse trip with better memories, or a more fun trip with fewer memories?  Why do some Senators act so obnoxiously to their subordinates?  Why don't more people from Hollywood go into politics?  From here on in, what is the best case scenario for your life?  Does it increase the productivity of a man if he marries a very religious woman?  If so, through what mechanism?  If China starts first with explicit genetic engineering, doe

  • Via Yves Smith, here is one hypothesis:

  • Someone once told me that there is nowhere we are more honest than the search box. That's from still-a-Wunder-but-no-longer-a-Kind Ben Casnocha.  Read the whole post, it's one of the best I've seen in some time.  For instance:

  • If you could create a punctuation mark, what would its function be and what would it look like?

  • Could this be the medium through which the fabled convergence finally occurs? Most of all, think of it as a substitute for your TV. It has the all-important quality of allowing you to bend your head and body as you wish (more or less), as you use it.  By bringing it closer or further, you control the "real size" of the iPad, so don't fixate on whether it appears "too big" or "too small." The pages turn faster than those of Kindle.  The other functions are also extremely quick and the battery feels eternal.

 
S&P 500: 1091.84 0% |FTSE: 5369.69 -0.71% |Nikk.: 9024.6 -2.23% |DAX: 6079.22 -0.64% |HSI: 21088.859 -1.48% |
FX: EUR/GBP: 1.2155 | USD/EUR: 1.271 | JPY/USD: 83.865 | Commodities: Gold: 1259.76 | Crude - CLH09.NYM: 0.00 |