Jump to Navigation
Home

Main menu

  • Home
  • News
  • Markets Map
  • Sentiments
  • Topics
  • Data
  • Comments
  • Images
  • Blog
  • About

Secondary menu

  • Latest News
  • Top Rated
  • Most Popular
  • Archive
  • Discussions
  • Shanghai GM to build Cadillac plant
  • Shanghai issues food safety blacklist
  • Overnight Markets: US stocks fall after Fed policy...
  • GM food influx a dilemma for consumers, farmers
  • Huawei unveils thinnest smartphone Ascend P6
  • Thursday Papers: Osborne weighs RBS ‘bad bank’
  • 10 Disturbing Tales From The Side Streets And Dark Alleys...
  • China June flash HSBC PMI hits nine-month low on weak...
  • China seeks to boost share of satellite market
  • Asian stocks fall on Fed policy plan, China data looms

    Bailout Bonus Brouhaha: Fannie Mae Edition

    Fri, 03/20/2009 - 16:44 EDT - Portfolio.com - Daily Brief
    • Comments

    Another bonus battle flared up today as a key lawmaker and government-controlled mortgage giant, Fannie Mae, crossed swords over the controversial money awards.

    Fannie Mae's chief executive sent employees an e-mail message defending the company's bonus program while Representative Barney Frank, Democrat of Massachusetts, countered with a demand that such bonuses be completely scrapped.

    Only a few million dollars are involved in the Fannie Mae bonuses -- the highest single award is just over $600,000. That's a drop in the $165 million bonus bucket that insurance giant A.I.G. doled out to its employees.

    Even so, widespread public fury that any bonuses are unjustified windfalls for failure, and the fact that taxpayer money has saved Fannie Mae and its sister company, Freddie Mac, has put most any executive retention bonus front and center for debate.

    Herbert Allison -- who took over at Fannie Mae last fall and works without a salary -- proclaimed his view in an e-mail to employees, which was disclosed to the Associated Press. Fannie's spokesman, Brian Faith, did not return calls for comment.

    "I am deeply concerned that eliminating our retention plan would jeopardize our ability to fulfill the mission the government has given us to address the housing crisis," he wrote employees.

    Noting that Fannie is charged with preventing housing foreclosures, he said the bonuses were needed to "ensure we maintain the skills and experience we need to help keep the mortgage market operating."

    Pshaw -- in a word -- said Frank, who chairs the House Financial Services Committee. He wrote Fannie's regulator, the Federal Housing Finance Agency, urging it to rescind the retention bonus programs, bar future bonuses, and recover any bonuses already paid.

    "I remain very skeptical that retaining and rewarding people who made the mistakes that contributed to the unsatisfactory performance is a good idea," he wrote in a letter released today.

    Plus -- given the troubled economy and job market -- "it is difficult to imagine that the companies would not be able to find competent and talented replacements for anyone who chooses to leave," he said.

    Even so, he may not find a sympathetic hearing from the regulatory agency's head, James Lockhart, who noted publicly this week that following the departure of Fannie's top layer of executives, "it would have been catastrophic to lose the next layers down and other highly experience employees."

    by Elizabeth OlsonRelated LinksLatest Bonus OutrageCue the OptimistsFannie Mae's Last Stand



    • Original article
     

    Related

    • Latest Bonus Outrage

      Wall Street isn't alone in having a tin ear when it comes to time to reward the same executives who helped push the country into its financial mess. Government-controlled mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are paying six-figure bonuses to retain the executives who presided over the loss of more than $100 billion last year alone, according to regulatory filings.

    • Fannie Mae CEO to resign

      Fannie Mae CEO Michael Williams plans to resign, the government-controlled mortgage giant said Tuesday. Williams, who took over as president and CEO of the troubled company in 2009, will continue as CEO until Fannie Mae's board names a successor. The firm did not provide a specific reason for Williams' departure; in a statement, Williams said only that he had decided that "the time is right to turn over the reins to a new leader." Williams will leave behind a firm still struggling to get its finances in order.

    • Bank of America Clash with Fannie Mae Intensifies; Insurance Disputes Put Taxpayers On the Hook For Still More Losses

      Taxpayers are already on the hook for $180 billion in losses at Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. That number is going to rise, perhaps significantly. The clever synonym for more taxpayer losses is "treasury Advance". With that understanding, please consider Fannie Mae's Losses Narrow but Treasury Advance Requested.

    • Fannie and Freddie: Pay for Perseverance

      It's no wonder that feet dragged when it came to disclosing the specifics of what government-rescued mortgage financers Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are paying to make sure their employees stick around. It's $210 million. About a fourth already was paid out last year, and another $159 million will be paid out this year and next, according to a letter from the companies' government regulator, James B. Lockhart, who heads the Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight.

    • Obama Releases Details on His Plan to Bail Out Banks, Fannie Mae, Hedge Funds, Wall Street, Fixing MERS and Screwing Taxpayers at Same Time; Key Aspects of Plan as Presented vs. Reality

      Today, under guise of helping "responsible homeowners" president Obama published details of Plan to Help Homeowners and Heal the Housing Market Key Aspects of the President’s Plan as Presented

    • Frank Says Fannie, Freddie Agreement May Come in 2011

    • Barney Frank, Then and Now, CD Edition

      Greg Mankiw has a great post about Barney Frank's changing views over time on affordable housing and the role of the GSEs.

    • Explaining FinReg: Fannie and Freddie

      The right way to think about Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac is to think about the widespread availability -- at least before the crisis -- of 30-year, fixed-rate mortgages with no prepayment penalty. That is not a financial product that flourishes in the state of nature, and for obvious reasons. If you're a bank, why do you want those mortgages? If interest rates go down, people refinance and pay the loan back early. If they go up, you might be losing money on the loan. It's heads they win, tails you lose.

    • Why aren't Fannie and Freddie in FinReg?

    • Frank Says Banks Paying Bonuses Can Also Pay Crisis Tax: Video

    Latest

    The Top Ten Stocks for June 19
    The Top Ten Stocks for June 19
    Six Months After Coming Out Of Stealth, EMC Has Reportedly Bought ScaleIO For As Much As $300 Million (EMC)
    Six Months After Coming Out Of Stealth, EMC Has...

    User login

    • Create new account
    • Request new password
    • Click on the icon to sign in with your social network login or enter your Bullfax.com login

    Our Blog

    • Oil Prices, India’s Inflation, Panama Canal and Bank Lending in Our News for Today 06/14/2013
    • SoftBank: Sprint to the finish
    • Royal Bank of Scotland, World Bank, European Stocks and Apple in Our Daily Round-Up for 06/13/2013

    Markets Map

    Markets Map

    Follow Us

    Follow Us on Facebook, Twitter, Google Plus and RSS LinkedIn Facebook Twitter Google Plus RSS
    S&P 500: 1628.93 -1.4% FTSE: 6348.82 -0.4% Nikk.: 13101.53 -1.1% DAX: 8197.08 -0.4% HSI: 20526.99 -2.24% FX: EUR/GBP: 1.1649 USD/EUR: 1.327 JPY/USD: 96.655 Commodities: Gold: 1346.85

    Bullfax.com - Market News & Analysis 2008-2011
    Contact Us | About Us | Terms & Conditions

    Follow Us on Facebook, Twitter, Google Plus and RSS LinkedIn Facebook Twitter Google Plus RSS .

    Secondary menu

    • Latest News
    • Top Rated
    • Most Popular
    • Archive
    • Discussions