Jump to Navigation
Home

Main menu

  • Home
  • News
  • Markets Map
  • Sentiments
  • Topics
  • Data
  • Comments
  • Images
  • Blog
  • About

Secondary menu

  • Latest News
  • Top Rated
  • Most Popular
  • Archive
  • Discussions
  • US issuers continue assault of Europe's ETF market
  • AMD Launches 'Kabini' And 'Temash' -...
  • Daily Mail publisher's print revenues slide
  • Mutual Funds garner over Rs 70,000 cr from investors in...
  • Exclusive: Glencore, Trafigura deals with Iran may have...
  • FTSE slides 1.5%, markets crash on Fed & China fears
  • Lebanon: 16 die in clashes over Syria
  • Phaneesh Murthy to be sued for sexually harassing iGate...
  • A Great Time To Short Aegean Marine Petroleum Network
  • SOE profits rise in first 4 months

    Public borrowing & the credit crunch

    Thu, 02/19/2009 - 10:27 EDT - Stumbling and Mumbling
    • Comments

    Today’s public finance numbers confirm what we all knew - that government borrowing is exploding. It’s quite possible that Darling’s forecasts made in November will be too optimistic. And ConservativeHome are talking about “bankrupt Britain.”What’s not sufficiently appreciated, however, is that this is in large part just an inevitable effect of the credit crunch.This follows from a basic national accounts identity - that across the whole economy, savings must equal investment.Finbal
    Now, the credit crunch means that private sector savings are rising, relative to investment. This is not just because folk are paying down debt. It’s also because credit constraints mean that people who would like to borrow cannot do so. If private sector savings rise relative to their investment - that is, they run a big financial surplus - someone else must run a deficit. There are only two candidates - foreigners or the government. But foreigners, especially those in Asia, are net savers. As a matter of arithmetic, therefore, the government deficit must increase.My chart shows this. It shows that for the last 20 years there’s been an inverse relationship between the government’s financial balance and the corporate sector’s. When companies save more than they invest, government runs a deficit. With companies now running the biggest surplus they ever have - partly because those who would like to borrow to invest cannot do so - it’s no surprise that the government is running a big deficit.  This has four implications:1. Britain’s red ink is not just due to New Labour’s profligacy. The OECD expects government borrowing to rise in most developed economies (though granted, more in the UK and US than elsewhere). This is because the rise in the private sector’s financial balance is a worldwide fact, albeit more so in the UK and US than elsewhere.2. It explains why gilt yields have stayed low. The same credit crunch that is, by simple arithmetic, responsible for government borrowing is also causing a “flight to quality” and low gilt yields.3. Your view on how big government borrowing becomes should depend very much upon your view of the credit crunch. If you’re pessimistic about the latter, you should expect big borrowing.4. It’s possible that the public finances might improve more than expected. If or when the credit crunch does end, companies might have a big backlog of unfilled capital expenditure plans. As these become realizable, the corporate surplus could swing into deficit, causing the public finances to improve quickly.Seems unlikely? Maybe. But I remember being told both in 1989 and 2000 - when the government was in surplus -  that we faced years of surplus. And I remember being told in the mid-90s that we faced years of deficits. It was all bull.Experience, then, teaches me that long-term forecasts of the public finances aren’t worth a wet fart.

    • Original article
    • Login or register to post comments
     

    Related

    • Public borrowing, private lending

      According to a recent poll, half of the public believe there is no need to cut spending to reduce public debt. Today’s figures from the Bank of England suggest they might be right.

    • Corporate surplus hits record

      The big story in today’s GDP numbers is that companies’ inability or unwillingness to invest has hit a record level. Non-financial firms’ financial balance - the gap between retained profits and investment - reached £26bn, or 7.4% of GDP, in Q4. This was by far the largest since current records began in 1987.

    • Second UK credit downgrade looms as Fitch ratings agency puts AAA on watch

    • Welfare spending & government borrowing

      Does social security spending add to government borrowing? I'm prompted to ask by Daniel Furr's claim, inspired by the IFS's forecast (pdf) of rising social security spending in coming years, that any government will have to cut such spending if it is to reduce borrowing.

    • China Rising, Rent-Seeking Version

      The usual concern about the US-China balance of economic and political power is couched in terms of our relative international payments positions.  We’ve run a large current account deficit in recent years (imports above exports); they still have – by some measures – the largest current account surplus (exports above imports) even seen in a major country.  They accumulate foreign assets, i.e., claims on other countries, such as the US.  We issue a great deal of debt that is bought by foreigners, including China.

    • Public finances: the left's problem

      It’s insufficiently appreciated just how much of a problem the state of the public finances poses for the Left. The difficulty is: how can public borrowing be reduced without sacrificing leftist objectives?

    • Wages, investment & the state

      Adam Ramsey says we are seeing “the biggest transfer of wealth from ordinary people to the mega-rich that we’ve seen since the Enclosure Acts”. I suspect there’s an element of hyperbole here, but he has a point: real wages have fallen in the last year, even though overall GDP is up.

    • Labour & the deficit

      Ed Miliband’s claim that government borrowing owes more to the global financial crisis than to Labour’s over-spending has met with a - ahem - sceptical

    • The budget: why Britain needs a stimulus | Editorial

    • Government borrowing & capitalism

      One curious fact about this recession is that corporate profits have held up quite well. Today’s figures (pdf) show that, in Q2, non-oil, non-financial firms’ net return on capital was 10.8%. Though down from the peak of 13.7% recorded as long ago as Q4 2006, this is comparable to end-2002’s rate, and far above the profit rates we saw in the 1991-92 recession, even though that was milder for output.So, why have profits held up? Two possibilities can be disregarded:

    Latest

    BRUTAL: Markets Are Getting Destroyed Around The World
    BRUTAL: Markets Are Getting Destroyed Around The...
    Work starts on Logic Leeds business park
    Work starts on Logic Leeds business park

    User login

    • Create new account
    • Request new password
    • Click on the icon to sign in with your social network login or enter your Bullfax.com login

    Our Blog

    • ICBC/Goldman Sachs: farewell
    • Japan’s budget deficit, Rolls-Royce, Raytheon and Sony in Our Daily Round-Up for 05/22/2013
    • Apple chief Tim Cook defends tax practices and denies avoidance

    Markets Map

    Markets Map

    Follow Us

    Follow Us on Facebook, Twitter, Google Plus and RSS LinkedIn Facebook Twitter Google Plus RSS
    S&P 500: 1655.35 -0.83% FTSE: 6727.05 -1.68% Nikk.: 14483.98 -7.89% DAX: 8350.30 -2.16% HSI: 22684.539 -2.54% FX: EUR/GBP: 1.1698 USD/EUR: 1.2865 JPY/USD: 101.845 Commodities: Gold: 1377.55

    Bullfax.com - Market News & Analysis 2008-2011
    Contact Us | About Us | Terms & Conditions

    Follow Us on Facebook, Twitter, Google Plus and RSS LinkedIn Facebook Twitter Google Plus RSS .

    Secondary menu

    • Latest News
    • Top Rated
    • Most Popular
    • Archive
    • Discussions