Jump to Navigation
Home

Main menu

  • Home
  • News
  • Markets Map
  • Sentiments
  • Topics
  • Data
  • Comments
  • Images
  • Blog
  • About

Secondary menu

  • Latest News
  • Top Rated
  • Most Popular
  • Archive
  • Discussions
  • The S&P 500 Enters A Post-Transition Period
  • Actavis to buy Warner Chilcott in $8.5 billion deal
  • 2 FBI agents die in training exercise
  • Is Cult of Celebrity Hindering Economic Growth?
  • Tumblr Is Exactly What Yahoo Needs: Windsor
  • Steve Cohen's SAC May Face Criminal Charges
  • 10 Things You Need To Know Before The Opening Bell
  • Actavis buying Warner Chilcott in $8.5B deal
  • Today's Economist: Nancy Folbre: Redeeming Bangladesh
  • EU law key to ending 'too big to fail' banks:...

    Myths About Adam Smith Ideas v. His Ideas

    Fri, 01/23/2009 - 15:43 EDT - curiouscatblog
    • capitalism
    • Comments
    • Economics

    Gavin Kennedy is a professor and director of contracts at Edinburgh Business School. He authors the Adam Smith’s Lost Legacy blog discussing the mis-attributions to Adam Smith, which are all too common now. A good example is, Perpetrators of Myths Mislead Generations of Students, Some of Whom Grow Up to (mis)Advise Legislators:

    The notion that Smith had a ‘theory’ of ‘an invisible hand’ leading all players in markets to act in pursuit of their self-interests and raise annual output and annual employment is a myth, invented (’made up’ would not be too strong a charge) by advocates of pro-corporate capitalism, then becoming rampant in the USA in the 1950s.
    …
    Smith’s intellectual arguments, and personal warmth for the growth of commercial society, were driven by the conviction that growth across agriculture, industry and specific, targeted public expenditure, such as defence, justice, and public works and public institutions, would assist the spread of opulence, especially to the labouring poor and their families, albeit slowly and gradually, but steadily too, if legislators and those who influenced them were careful not to approve monopoly schemes to narrow markets and restrict competition, not to indulge in spasms of ‘jealousy of trade’, protectionism, forming loss-making colonies and conducting wars for trivial ends (i.e., not for defensive purposes only).

    Introducing, a mystical or miraculous force at work in markets detracts from the real and detailed policy measures that may required from time to time to ensure steady growth, competition, and liberty for all, and not just for the amoral ends of privileged monopolists and their cronies.

    Related: Not Understanding Capitalism - Ignorance of Capitalism - Monopolies and Oligopolies do not a Free Market Make - Estate Tax Repeal, Bad Policy

    • Original article
    • Login or register to post comments

    Related

    • On Adam Smith’s Invisible Hand

      Two Professors Argue About the Invisible Hand - And Both Get it Wrong too

    • New McKinsey Study Pokes Fatal Holes in Common Trade Myths

      Readers of this blog know that one of the themes here has been dismantling pervasive "protectionist myths" that mislead the public into supporting - and thereby empower politicians to implement - anti-trade policies.

    • How Supposed Free-Market Theorists Destroyed Free-Market Theory

      This guest post was contributed by Dan Geldon, a fellow at the Roosevelt Institute.  He is a former counsel at the Congressional Oversight Panel and a graduate of Harvard Law School.

    • OBAMA: State Abortion Restrictions Are Taking America Back To The 1950s

      President Barack Obama plowed back into the "War on Women" at a speech during the Planned Parenthood annual conference Friday, blasting conservatives who have pushed to restrict abortion access at the state level.

    • 'Is 'Intellectual Property' a Misnomer?'

      Tim Taylor:

    • Buy power, sell ideas

       

    • "Common mistakes made by economists"

      Ezra's post is worth reproducing (after the intro) in full: ...here’s a list of mistakes that I think economists and people who are heavily influenced by economists tend to make when they look at politics. I should preface this by saying I have, at one point or another, been guilty of literally everything on this list:

    • Giving Thanks for Capitalism, The Invisible Hand, The Miracle of the Market and No Turkey Czars

    • Measures of Success

      In times of turmoil and uncertainty, it's always a good if not an opportuinistic moment to scrutinize foundamentals. Now the global economy is experiencing a significant revision not only in the pricing but in the structural models it uses. There has been a steep, dramatic inravelling of a financial system, built and dominated by monetarists. People who belive in small government, central banks, and the omnipotent powers of self-regulation and development of the market players.

    Latest

    Is Cult of Celebrity Hindering Economic Growth?
    Is Cult of Celebrity Hindering Economic Growth?
    Tumblr Is Exactly What Yahoo Needs: Windsor
    Tumblr Is Exactly What Yahoo Needs: Windsor

    User login

    • Create new account
    • Request new password
    • Click on the icon to sign in with your social network login or enter your Bullfax.com login

    Our Blog

    • China’s Insurers, PC Shipments, Bird flu Consequences and French taxes in Our Daily Round-Up for 05/20/2013
    • Yahoo buys start-up Tumblr for $1bn
    • Aviva steps up drive for cost cuts

    Markets Map

    Markets Map

    Follow Us

    Follow Us on Facebook, Twitter, Google Plus and RSS LinkedIn Facebook Twitter Google Plus RSS
    S&P 500: 1667.47 1.02% FTSE: 6714.70 0.4% Nikk.: 15360.81 1.45% DAX: 8428.37 0.36% HSI: 23493.029 1.75% FX: EUR/GBP: 1.1818 USD/EUR: 1.2861 JPY/USD: 102.525 Commodities: Gold: 1355.65

    Bullfax.com - Market News & Analysis 2008-2011
    Contact Us | About Us | Terms & Conditions

    Follow Us on Facebook, Twitter, Google Plus and RSS LinkedIn Facebook Twitter Google Plus RSS .

    Secondary menu

    • Latest News
    • Top Rated
    • Most Popular
    • Archive
    • Discussions