Jump to Navigation
Home

Main menu

  • Home
  • News
  • Markets Map
  • Sentiments
  • Topics
  • Data
  • Comments
  • Images
  • Blog
  • About

Secondary menu

  • Latest News
  • Top Rated
  • Most Popular
  • Archive
  • Discussions
  • Mystery Surrounding Collapse Of Hong Kong Mercantile...
  • Credit spreads are moderately attractive
  • Government by Eurocrats: The Olive-Oil Dispenser Debacle
  • DOJ Notified News Corp. About Phone-Record Seizure
  • DOJ Notified News Corp. About Phone-Record Seizure
  • Victory At Last for Big, Bad, Bayern
  • French Soldier Injured in Attack Outside Paris
  • Three More Detained in Soldier's Killing
  • Nestlé Global Healthy Kids Program Reaches lands Beijing
  • Interpol Rejects Russia Bid to Locate U.K. Investor

    More Clarity Needed on Af/Pak Linkages

    Wed, 12/02/2009 - 13:21 EDT - Mathew Yglesias
    • Afghanistan
    • Comments
    • Pakistan
    • uncat

    091122-F-9171L-013
    One of the frustrating things about the Afghanistan surge debate in the United States is that it’s often difficult to pin people down as to exactly how it is they think they’re preferred approach to Afghanistan will contribute to Pakistani stability. Complicating this is that there are a number of different organizations fitting under the umbrella term “Taliban” and while they have a lot in common, one point of difference is specifically their relationship with Pakistan. As my CAP colleague Brian Katulis explains:
    The United States has accused Pakistan of maintaining ties and offering support to groups such as the Quetta Shura Taliban, the Haqqani network, and Hezb-e-Islami Gulbuddin — which all play roles in the insurgency in Afghanistan. These groups are different from extremist groups like Tehrik-e-Taliban Pakistan, which have been behind the increased violence targeting civilians and military installations alike inside of Pakistan.
    In the murky world of northwest Pakistan, the dividing line between the Afghan Taliban and the Pakistani Taliban isn’t always clear, but the main point is that one set of groups has received support from the Pakistani security establishment, and another set is at war with the Pakistani security establishment.
    Understanding that distinction is important to answering tough questions such as whether a surge of additional U.S. forces to Afghanistan could actually further undermine Pakistan’s stability.
    Note that the Prime Minister of India is very eager to see deep U.S. engagement in Afghanistan and Prime Ministers of India are not known for their deep commitment to Pakistan’s stability and well-being. We have tens of thousands of soldiers in Afghanistan, and are set to have tens of thousands more. That naturally tends to lead Americans to focus predominantly on Afghanistan, which is where Americans are fighting and dying. But by any objective standard, our interests are greater in Pakistan. So even if it makes sense for U.S. military engagement to be primarily focused on Afghanistan, it’s still important for American policy attention to keep these issues in appropriate perspective.


    • Original article
    • Login or register to post comments
     

    Related

    • Does Helping Hamid Karzai Conquer Afghanistan Stabilize Pakistan?

    • Drone Strike Kills 12 in Pakistan

      The capacity to drop bombs on terrorists from unpiloted planes is clearly valuable and something the United States of America will want to do on occasion. But I think we need to be much, much, much more careful because this sort of thing is incredibly harmful:

    • ‘Lethal authority’: How the U.S. came to launch a covert drone war in Pakistan

      Nek Muhammad knew he was being followed. On a hot day in June 2004, the Pashtun tribesman was lounging inside a mud compound in South Waziristan, speaking by satellite phone to one of the many reporters who regularly interviewed him on how he had fought and humbled Pakistan’s army in the country’s western mountains. He asked one of his followers about the strange, metallic bird hovering above him.

    • U.S. drones kill senior Taliban commander in Pakistan, intelligence officials say

      PESHAWAR, Pakistan – Two U.S. drone strikes on northwest Pakistan killed a senior Taliban commander who fought American forces in Afghanistan but had a truce with the Pakistani military, intelligence officials said Thursday. The commander, Maulvi Nazir, was among nine people killed in a missile strike on a house in the village of Angoor Adda in the South Waziristan tribal region near the border with Afghanistan late Wednesday night, five Pakistani security officials said on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to talk to the media.

    • How Important Is Pakistan?

      Joshua Foust’s overview of US-Pakistan relations in the wake of Osama bin Laden’s killing is really great reading, but I’m not sure I agree with the conclusion:

    • The View From Pakistan

      Something that I don’t think is well-understood in the American conversation is that Pakistani perceptions of what’s going on are very divergent from the narrative that exists here in the states. For example, Shahid R. Siddiqi had a piece in the Pakistani paper Dawn earlier this week arguing that Barack Obama’s plan to have US forces leave Afghanistan in 2011 to be replaced by an Indian garrison is doomed to failure:

    • Afghanistan urges Pakistan to target terror groups

      Afghanistan's national security adviser has called on the Pakistani government to "take serious measures" against Islamist groups launching attacks on Afghan targets from secure havens inside Pakistan.Rangin Dadfar Spanta spoke to AFP in an interview a week after the Al-Jazeera television network said Afghan President Hamid Karzai had met the man who runs the Al-Qaeda-linked Haqqani network in talks mediated by Pakistan.Afghanistan, Pakistan and the Taliban all deny any such meeting.

    • “Decapitating” Terrorist Groups Doesn’t Work

    • The Surge and Afghan Women

      I think it’s good that Barack Obama didn’t pull the cynical stunt of trying to pretend that US military engagement in Afghanistan is primarily about helping Afghan women. That said, I think Dylan Matthews goes too far in suggesting that US military engagement in Afghanistan is actually irrelevant for Afghan women:

    • Pakistan Military Growing Wary of United States?

      Husain Haqqani

    Latest

    Credit spreads are moderately attractive
    Credit spreads are moderately attractive
    Mystery Surrounding Collapse Of Hong Kong Mercantile Exchange Deepens; Four Arrested
    Mystery Surrounding Collapse Of Hong Kong...

    User login

    • Create new account
    • Request new password
    • Click on the icon to sign in with your social network login or enter your Bullfax.com login

    Our Blog

    • Tata Steel, ECB, China’s car market and European Corporate Tax in Our News for Today 05/24/2013
    • Pandora: the charm might fade away
    • Japanese Market, Indian Rupee, China’s Stocks and Oil Prices in Our Daily Round-Up for 05/23/2013

    Markets Map

    Markets Map

    Follow Us

    Follow Us on Facebook, Twitter, Google Plus and RSS LinkedIn Facebook Twitter Google Plus RSS
    S&P 500: 1649.60 -0.06% FTSE: 6654.34 -0.64% Nikk.: 14612.45 0.88% DAX: 8305.32 -0.56% HSI: 22618.67 -0.23% FX: EUR/GBP: 1.1694 USD/EUR: 1.2935 JPY/USD: 101.175 Commodities: Gold: 1386.60

    Bullfax.com - Market News & Analysis 2008-2011
    Contact Us | About Us | Terms & Conditions

    Follow Us on Facebook, Twitter, Google Plus and RSS LinkedIn Facebook Twitter Google Plus RSS .

    Secondary menu

    • Latest News
    • Top Rated
    • Most Popular
    • Archive
    • Discussions