Jump to Navigation
Home

Main menu

  • Home
  • News
  • Markets Map
  • Sentiments
  • Topics
  • Data
  • Comments
  • Images
  • Blog
  • About

Secondary menu

  • Latest News
  • Top Rated
  • Most Popular
  • Archive
  • Discussions
  • China seeks to boost share of satellite market
  • China June flash HSBC PMI hits nine-month low on weak...
  • Asian stocks fall on Fed policy plan, China data looms
  • Sony to consider Third Point's proposal: Sony CEO...
  • Apparel sales jump in May
  • Sony to consider Third Point's proposal: Sony CEO...
  • Sony to consider Third Point's proposal: Sony CEO...
  • aimler creates dedicated China sales operation at...
  • China June flash HSBC PMI hits nine-month low on weak...
  • Bill Gross: "Bernanke Might Be Driving In A Fog"

    Helping Where We’re Not Wanted

    Thu, 08/20/2009 - 14:28 EDT - Mathew Yglesias
    • Comments
    • International Relations
    • Pakistan
    • uncat

    Undersecretary of State for Public Affairs Judith McHale (official photo)Undersecretary of State for Public Affairs Judith McHale (official photo)
    The administration has some pretty exciting ideas about increasing American assistance to Pakistan and rebalancing much more toward the civilian side of things and away from our traditional reliance on military strongmen as our key friends over there. I think it’s a good idea and on a number of levels it seems to hold a lot of promise. What’s more, the strategic goal strikes me as fairly clear—a legitimate, effective Pakistani state would serve our interests, and the costs involved in even a “big” aid program are pretty low in the scheme of things.
    My one doubt about this all is, however, a pretty serious one. By all anecdotal accounts I’ve ever heard from Pakistanis or Pakistani-Americans, the United States is really really hated in Pakistan. And the polling from Pew and others bears that out. Helene Cooper has a good piece about this in The New York Times:
    Judith A. McHale was expecting a contentious session with Ansar Abbasi, a Pakistani journalist known for his harsh criticism of American foreign policy, when she sat down for a one-on-one meeting with him in a hotel conference room in Islamabad on Monday. She got that, and a little bit more. [...] “‘You should know that we hate all Americans,’” Ms. McHale said Mr. Abbasi told her. “‘From the bottom of our souls, we hate you.’”

    Beyond the continuation of the battle against militants along the Pakistani-Afghan border, a big part of President Obama’s strategy for the region involves trying to broaden America’s involvement in the country to include nonmilitary areas like infrastructure development, trade, energy, schools and jobs — all aimed at convincing the Pakistani people that the United States is their friend. But as Ms. McHale and other American officials discovered this week, during a visit by Richard C. Holbrooke, the special representative to Pakistan and Afghanistan, making that case was not going to be easy.
    On the one hand, this could be said to underscore the vital need for a big reboot of US commitment to Pakistan. On the other hand, how effective can anything we try to do to help Pakistan be under situations where people really don’t seem to want our help? It’s also noteworthy that if you look around the countries where we’re most disliked tend to be our “friends” like Pakistan and Egypt while in countries we don’t “help” like Iran we’re see much more positively.


    • Original article
    • Login or register to post comments
     

    Related

    • Winning Friends By Helping People

      A Pew poll released several weeks ago revealed that despite various American efforts since 9/11 to improve our image in Pakistan most Pakistani regard the United States as an enemy of their nation. China, by contrast, is very well-regarded.

    • How Serious is the Obama Administration About Civilian Rule in Afghanistan

      General Ashfaq Kayani

    • Development is Hard

    • Obama defends U.S. drone attacks, but says civilian ‘deaths will haunt us as long as we live’

      WASHINGTON — President Barack Obama on Thursday defended America’s controversial drone attacks as legal, effective and a necessary linchpin in an evolving U.S. counterterrorism policy. But he acknowledged the targeted strikes are no “cure-all” and said he is haunted by the civilians unintentionally killed.

    • Don't Expect American Foreign Policy To Change Now That John Kerry Is Secretary Of State

      A couple of months ago, Senator John Kerry showed up more than an hour late for a reception at the Museum of Fine Arts in Boston. An aide whispered that Kerry's flight home from Dubai had been delayed. No one knew that Kerry had traveled to Dubai, and no announcement was made afterward.

    • Guest Post: A Roadmap For American Grand Strategy Part 3 (Of 3)

      Following Part 1's discussion of America's Dangerous Drift, and Part 2's succincy summation of why America needs a Grand Strategy, today's Part 3 concludes with a discussion of the 'choice' American leaders have: "A decline in America’s leadership role and the emergence of a highly unstable world is a serious possibility.

    • Someone else is hitting al-Qaeda with drone strikes in Pakistan: U.S.

      ISLAMABAD — When news of the two latest drone strikes emerged from Pakistan’s tribal belt in early February, it seemed to be business as usual by the CIA. Media reports, citing unnamed Pakistani officials, carried typical details: Swarms of U.S. drones had swooped into remote areas, killing up to nine people, including two senior al-Qaeda commanders. Pakistan’s Foreign Ministry lodged a protest with the U.S. Embassy. Yet there was one problem, according to three U.S. officials with knowledge of the program: The United States did not carry out those attacks.

    • Pakistani Opinion on Drones

      Spencer Ackerman summarizes the findings of a new Pew survey (PDF) on Pakistani views and pulls out the surprising-seeming news that most Pakistanis say they don’t know anything about the drone strikes program:

    • Actions, Not Words, Will Clarify Obama’s Foreign Policy

      David Brooks’ piece on Barack Obama’s “Christian Realism” is pretty good, but it mostly reminded me that I think one of the worst habits of American journalism is to look at foreign policy through a lens of high-order abstractions. “Realism” has a really clear meaning in an academic context, and there are substantial bodies of non-realist academic thought it contends with. In the context of practical policymaking, however, it’s not totally clear what it means.

    Latest

    The Top Ten Stocks for June 19
    The Top Ten Stocks for June 19
    Six Months After Coming Out Of Stealth, EMC Has Reportedly Bought ScaleIO For As Much As $300 Million (EMC)
    Six Months After Coming Out Of Stealth, EMC Has...

    User login

    • Create new account
    • Request new password
    • Click on the icon to sign in with your social network login or enter your Bullfax.com login

    Our Blog

    • Oil Prices, India’s Inflation, Panama Canal and Bank Lending in Our News for Today 06/14/2013
    • SoftBank: Sprint to the finish
    • Royal Bank of Scotland, World Bank, European Stocks and Apple in Our Daily Round-Up for 06/13/2013

    Markets Map

    Markets Map

    Follow Us

    Follow Us on Facebook, Twitter, Google Plus and RSS LinkedIn Facebook Twitter Google Plus RSS
    S&P 500: 1628.93 -1.4% FTSE: 6348.82 -0.4% Nikk.: 13101.53 -1.1% DAX: 8197.08 -0.4% HSI: 20558.42 -2.08% FX: EUR/GBP: 1.1648 USD/EUR: 1.3271 JPY/USD: 96.752 Commodities: Gold: 1347.00

    Bullfax.com - Market News & Analysis 2008-2011
    Contact Us | About Us | Terms & Conditions

    Follow Us on Facebook, Twitter, Google Plus and RSS LinkedIn Facebook Twitter Google Plus RSS .

    Secondary menu

    • Latest News
    • Top Rated
    • Most Popular
    • Archive
    • Discussions