Jump to Navigation
Home

Main menu

  • Home
  • News
  • Markets Map
  • Sentiments
  • Topics
  • Data
  • Comments
  • Images
  • Blog
  • About

Secondary menu

  • Latest News
  • Top Rated
  • Most Popular
  • Archive
  • Discussions
  • Ads that make a difference honored in Cannes
  • Battle Brews Over E-Cigarettes
  • Why Yellen Should Be Next Fed Chief
  • Kodak prepares $406 million offering as it eyes...
  • Bespoke carmaker opens showroom
  • We'll Get One Last Unconventional Economic Indicator...
  • United Dreamliner diverted due to possible oil filter...
  • StubHub sees stadium naming deal as ticket to expanding...
  • BuzzFeed reporter Hastings dead at 33
  • G8 Welcomed Japan's Economic Policies

    Why stagnation matters

    Thu, 12/01/2011 - 10:34 EDT - Stumbling and Mumbling
    • Comments

    The IFS’s Paul Johnson says (pdf):

    Real median household incomes will be no higher in 2015–16 they were in 2002–03, more than a decade without any increase in living standards for those in the middle of the income distribution. We estimate that in the period 2009-10 to 2012-13 real median household incomes will drop by a whopping 7.4%.

    History suggests this could have nasty consequences. Benjamin Friedman has shown that (pdf):

    Economic growth—meaning a rising standard of living for the clear majority of citizens—more often than not fosters greater opportunity, tolerance of diversity, social mobility, commitment to fairness, and dedication to democracy…But when living standards stagnate or decline, most societies make little if any progress toward any of these goals, and in all too many instances they plainly retrogress.

    A new paper provides micro-level evidence to corroborate this. It looked at the impact of lottery wins on personality and found that money makes us nicer people:

    Unearned income improves traits that predict pro-social and cooperative behaviors, preferences for social contact, empathy, and gregariousness, and reduces individuals’ tendency toward negative emotional states.

    The danger, then, seems clear. Economic regress might mean social regress - more conflict, anti-socialness and intolerance.
    But herein lies a puzzle. There seems little evidence - so far - that this is happening (Clarkson and tram woman are of more interest to the psychiatric than the social sciences). Crime hasn’t risen much, the far right is a nugatory force, and people seem to be quite happy; I‘m not sure whether August‘s riots count as evidence here or not.
    Which raises questions. Are there some mechanisms which offset the above tendencies and so cause economic stagnation to not have such adverse effects - some combination of peer effects and path dependency perhaps? Or am I misreading the evidence? Or will things change as I fear? I honestly don’t know. But I do know that this, rather than a few tweaks to fiscal policy, is the key issue.

    • Original article
    • Login or register to post comments
     

    Related

    • Therapy May Change Your Personality

      Some doctors balk at the idea of trying to change a patient's personality, but a new study suggests that they're doing it already. The results show that talk therapy or psychiatric medications can change personality in healthy people and those with psychological disorders.

    • Brain Scans Can Help Detect Which Prisoners Will Commit A Crime Again

      Is there a way to predict who is most likely to commit a crime in the future, and if so, what should the authorities do about it? In work that seems like science fiction, researchers have found that brain scans could help detect which convicts might get arrested for new crimes once they leave prison.

    • 'Universal' Personality Traits Aren't Actually Universal

      Psychologists can get a pretty clear picture of someone's personality by evaluating to what degree they express traits known as the "Big Five" — openness, conscientiousness, extroversion, agreeableness and neuroticism.

    • The trouble with preferences

      The Daily Mail reports that “almost half of young women aged 18 to 25 would prefer to have large breasts than high intelligence.” This raises four issues about the role of preferences in the social sciences:

    • Income Mobility is Much More Important Than Rising Income Inequality or Stagnating Household Income, and We Have a Lot of It (Mobility)

      We hear a lot these days about "increasing income inequality" and "stagnating household income," but those discussions rarely

    • Median Household Incomes: A Weak Start For 2013

      By Doug Short: Overview: The Sentier Research monthly median household income data series is now available for January. Nominal median household incomes rose 0.4% month-over-month, and 3.3% year-over-year. But adjusted for inflation, real growth was 0.09% MoM and 1.7% YoY. The traditional source of household income data is the Census Bureau, which publishes annual household income data each September for the previous year.

    • Mechanisms vs models

      Simon Wren-Lewis asks a good question about Robert Lucas‘s and John Cochrane‘s apparent misunderstanding of the balanced budget multiplier: how can very clever people make silly errors?

    • Crime & immigration

      What’s the link between immigrants and crime? Liberals are loath to raise this question. But perhaps they shouldn’t be, as a paper presented to the RES annual conference yesterday by Franscesco Fasani (earlier version in this pdf)  shows.It looked at the effects of two different waves of immigration; asylum-seekers in the early 00s, and workers from the A8 countries after 2004.

    • Median-itis and The Great Stagnation

      Here is my NYT column from today, on themes relevant to The Great Stagnation.  I won't rehash this entire discussion, but I would like to focus on this one column excerpt:

    • What is real spending?

      The fuss over Gordon Brown misleading the Chilcot enquiry about real increases in MoD spending shows, yet again, how shallow our political debate is - because there are some tricky issues here.

    Latest

    We'll Get One Last Unconventional Economic Indicator Before Tomorrow's Fed Announcement (FDX)
    We'll Get One Last Unconventional Economic...
    CHiNDoGu EXPLaiNeD
    CHiNDoGu EXPLaiNeD

    User login

    • Create new account
    • Request new password
    • Click on the icon to sign in with your social network login or enter your Bullfax.com login

    Our Blog

    • Oil Prices, India’s Inflation, Panama Canal and Bank Lending in Our News for Today 06/14/2013
    • SoftBank: Sprint to the finish
    • Royal Bank of Scotland, World Bank, European Stocks and Apple in Our Daily Round-Up for 06/13/2013

    Markets Map

    Markets Map

    Follow Us

    Follow Us on Facebook, Twitter, Google Plus and RSS LinkedIn Facebook Twitter Google Plus RSS
    S&P 500: 1651.81 0.77% FTSE: 6374.21 0.69% Nikk.: 13265.28 1.94% DAX: 8229.51 0.17% HSI: 21225.881 -0% FX: EUR/GBP: 1.1666 USD/EUR: 1.3398 JPY/USD: 95.485 Commodities: Gold: 1367.90

    Bullfax.com - Market News & Analysis 2008-2011
    Contact Us | About Us | Terms & Conditions

    Follow Us on Facebook, Twitter, Google Plus and RSS LinkedIn Facebook Twitter Google Plus RSS .

    Secondary menu

    • Latest News
    • Top Rated
    • Most Popular
    • Archive
    • Discussions