Jump to Navigation
Home

Main menu

  • Home
  • News
  • Markets Map
  • Sentiments
  • Topics
  • Data
  • Comments
  • Images
  • Blog
  • About

Secondary menu

  • Latest News
  • Top Rated
  • Most Popular
  • Archive
  • Discussions
  • Stockholm Riots Leave Sweden's Dreams Of Perfect...
  • Four Tips for a Successful Online Apartment Search
  • On Memorial Day, Remembering The Athletes Who Died...
  • Cars With The Highest Theft Rates
  • Google Pushes Into Emerging Markets
  • Memorial Day shopping do’s and don’ts
  • American Tower: VoLTE Represents Future Growth
  • There's More To Consider Than Just The Fed
  • Bloomberg Businessweek Is Trying To Shame Millennials...
  • Bond Vortex In The Works?

    Why Hedge Funds Are Less Risky Than Banks

    Mon, 08/23/2010 - 12:20 EDT - Seeking Alpha
    • C
    • Felix Salmon
    • MS

    Felix Salmon submits: I’ve been waiting for a good critical review of Sebastian Mallaby’s tome on hedge funds, and the longer that we go without one, the stronger Mallaby’s pro-hedgie case would seem to be. Now, Noam Scheiber comes along in the New Republic, and his criticisms of Mallaby are pretty unconvincing: The Financial Times reported earlier this month that “many star traders across Wall Street and the City of London are … decamping for hedge funds in their droves amid a crackdown that will sharply curtail banks’ riskier activities.” So some of the same folks who brought you the financial crisis will henceforth be working their magic with more leverage and less regulation. How reassuring.Complete Story »

    • Original article
    • Login or register to post comments
     

    Related

    • Prop-hostile climate throws up tough calls for banks

      Many star traders across Wall Street and the City of London are voting with their feet, heading for hedge funds in their droves amid a crackdown that will sharply curtail banks’ riskier activities

    • Helping Consumers While Helping Banks

      Alyssa Katz has a very interesting piece about how contrary to the stereotype of Texas as a wild west land of deregulation it actually had a number of strict regulations on mortgage lending that helped avoid a housing bubble. But Felix Salmon says she focused on too narrow a piece of the overall story:

    • Paul Krugman and Noam Scheiber: Obama Makes Another Strategic Mistake

      Paul Krugman: Conceder In Chief?: OK, I’ve had my own sorta-kinda briefing on the apparent fiscal cliff deal, and I’m pretty much with Noam Scheiber. Viewed on its own, it’s a bad and upsetting deal but not as terrible as initial rumors had it. But the strategic consequences are likely to be very bad indeed, and in very short order too.

    • Only Michael Lewis Could Turn A Financial Book Review Into A Gripping Read On Wall Street Culture

      Financial journalist and award-winning author Michael Lewis has a glowing review of John Lanchester's upcoming novel Capital, which will be published in May. 

    • Banks Deeply Involved in FBI-Coordinated Suppression of “Terrorist” Occupy Wall Street

      If you had any doubts of the veracity of former IMF chief economist Simon Johnson’s depiction of the financial crisis as a “quiet coup,” a pre-Christmas release of FBI documents should put them to rest. While I linked to a discussion of the results of the Partnership for Civil Justice’s FOIA of FBI materials on Occupy Wall Street, I was remiss in not writing them up earlier.

    • Should NYC Mayor Michael Bloomberg Buy the Financial Times?

      What is it about the Financial Times that inspires such longing among billionaires? The salmon-hued daily newspaper, which is owned by London-based publishing and education giant Pearson, is widely considered a must-read on Wall Street and in the upper echelons of the business world. In fact, more so than perhaps any other daily news publication, the FT can lay claim to being the paper of record for so-called “C-suite” executives, a term that refers to a company’s most senior management. Billionaire media mogul Rupert Murdoch reportedly eyed the FT for many years.

    • Explaining financial regulation: Leverage and capital requirements

    • Why Not a Hard Leverage Cap

    • A future of financial crises

      Felix Salmon recaps an interesting argument he had with Robert Pozen, author of the new book Too Big to Save:

    • Should Banks Be Allowed to Repay TARP Funds?

      Felix Salmon makes the case for allowing the banks to repay the TARP funds. And it's convincing. "If Treasury needs new firepower to rescue banks in real trouble, then — given Congressional opposition to any new bailout bill — the only way to get the necessary funds will be to use money already in the TARP account.

    Latest

    Bloomberg Businessweek Is Trying To Shame Millennials Into Moving Out Of Their Parents House
    Bloomberg Businessweek Is Trying To Shame...
    Bond Vortex In The Works?
    Bond Vortex In The Works?

    User login

    • Create new account
    • Request new password
    • Click on the icon to sign in with your social network login or enter your Bullfax.com login

    Our Blog

    • Tata Steel, ECB, China’s car market and European Corporate Tax in Our News for Today 05/24/2013
    • Pandora: the charm might fade away
    • Japanese Market, Indian Rupee, China’s Stocks and Oil Prices in Our Daily Round-Up for 05/23/2013

    Markets Map

    Markets Map

    Follow Us

    Follow Us on Facebook, Twitter, Google Plus and RSS LinkedIn Facebook Twitter Google Plus RSS
    S&P 500: 1649.60 -0.06% FTSE: 6654.34 -0.64% Nikk.: 14612.45 0.88% DAX: 8305.32 -0.56% HSI: 22618.67 -0.23% FX: EUR/GBP: 1.1694 USD/EUR: 1.2935 JPY/USD: 101.175 Commodities: Gold: 1386.60

    Bullfax.com - Market News & Analysis 2008-2011
    Contact Us | About Us | Terms & Conditions

    Follow Us on Facebook, Twitter, Google Plus and RSS LinkedIn Facebook Twitter Google Plus RSS .

    Secondary menu

    • Latest News
    • Top Rated
    • Most Popular
    • Archive
    • Discussions