Jump to Navigation
Home

Main menu

  • Home
  • News
  • Markets Map
  • Sentiments
  • Topics
  • Data
  • Comments
  • Images
  • Blog
  • About

Secondary menu

  • Latest News
  • Top Rated
  • Most Popular
  • Archive
  • Discussions
  • Swiss Politicians Would Rather Have The US Sue The Heck...
  • Decline and fall: how American society unravelled
  • How The End Of Don’t Ask Don’t Tell Will Force Gay...
  • Mark Zuckerberg Went To Korea To Ask Samsung To Make A...
  • Hilarious Interviews With Miami Heat Fans Who Left Game 6...
  • James Franco Explains Why Studios Keep Remaking Superhero...
  • The HPV Vaccine Is Even More Effective Than Researchers...
  • Bernanke to Speak: 3 Big Questions We Hope the Fed Chief...
  • DealBook: Wesley Clark, Retired General, Joins Blackstone...
  • ITALY: Dolce and Gabbana sentenced to jail for tax evasion

    Who will still be famous in 10,000 years?

    Mon, 02/28/2011 - 08:40 EDT - Marginal Revolution
    • books
    • Comments
    • Education
    • history
    • Science

    Sam Hammond, a loyal MR reader, asks me:
    Who do you think will still be famous in 10,000 years? People from history or now. Shakespeare? Socrates? Hawking? 
    This requires a theory of 10,000 years from now, but let's say we're a lot richer, not computer uploads (if so, I know the answer to the question), and not in a collapsed dystopia.  We still look like human beings and inhabit physical space.  If you wish, postulate that not all of those 10,000 years involved strongly positive economic growth.
    In that case, I'll go with the major religious leaders (Jesus, Buddha, etc.), Einstein, Turing, Watson and Crick, Hitler, the major classical music composers, Adam Smith, and Neil Armstrong.
    My thinking is this.  The major religions last for a long time and leave a real mark on history.  Path-dependence is critical in that area. 
    Otherwise, an individual, to stay famous, will have to securely symbolize an entire area, and an area "with legs" at that.  The theory of relativity still will be true and it may well become more important.  The computer and DNA will not be irrelevant.  Hitler will remain a stand-in symbol for pure evil; if he is topped we may not have a future at all.  Beethoven and Mozart still will be splendid, but Shakespeare and other wordsmiths will require translation and thus will fade somewhat.  The propensity to truck and barter will remain and Smith will keep his role as the symbol of economics.  Keynesian economics may someday be less true, as superior biofeedback, combined with markets in self-improvement, ushers in an era of flexible wages, while market-based expected nominal gdp targeting prevents a downward deflationary spiral.
    The fame of those individuals will not perish, in part, because the more distant future will produce fewer lasting mega-famous people.  Achievement will be more decentralized and more connected to teams.  The dominance of Edison and Tesla, in their breakthroughs, will not be repeated.  There won't be a mega-Einstein eighty years from now, to make everyone forget the current Einstein, even if (especially if) science goes very well.

    • Original article
    • Login or register to post comments
     

    Related

    • Scientists Are Taking An Academic Eye To Pop Music, And Here's Why

      Since the rise of recordings and radio in the early twentieth century, music has been a constant and often integral part of American culture. Any comprehensive account of the history of the last one hundred years requires at least some understanding of how music fits into the picture.

    • Knowing A Lot Doesn't Have Much To Do With Success

      One time or another, you’ve had the thought running through your head that if you only knew more you would be more successful in life. It’s only natural to think that. Most of the first 20 years of your life are completely focused on how much you know. And who you know more than. So it’s only natural that you think knowing more will make you more successful.  Perhaps another degree, a conference, or a DVD business series is what you need to turn your situation around. It’s frustrating.

    • Classical music for $100

      Enda asks:

    • IBM's Watson On Jeopardy

      I watched part 3 of IBM's Watson computer on Jeopardy. It was pretty impressive, that they could make a computer that frequently gave correct answers.The computer had some unfair advantages. The most obvious advantage was near-perfect buzzer timing. Whenever both the computer and a human knew the answer, the computer usually got to the buzzer first.

    • Cancel the Apocalypse: The New Path to Prosperity by Andrew Simms – review

    • Hitler Home Movies: How Eva Braun Documented The Dictator's Life

    • Classical economics reading list

      Joel, a loyal MR reader, asks me:

    • Buchanan’s Apologia for Hitler

      As if some neocon were setting out to parody dovish thinking on contemporary issues, paleocon Pat Buchanan has gone and written a “blame Britian first” account of the origins of World War II. Apparently, according to Buchanan, Hitler was just seeking to unify the German-speaking people in one country by annexing Danzig and had no intention of fighting a wider war:

    • Classical music cuts crime in New Zealand city

      Classical music piped through speakers has dramatically reduced crime rates in the centre of New Zealand's second largest city, retailers said Monday.They said the introduction of soothing music from composers such as Mozart had seen the number of anti-social incidents attended by security guards in Christchurch's City Mall fall from 86 a week in 2008 to two a week this year.Central City Business Association manager Paul Lonsdale said the music had helped residents and retailers reclaim the mall.

    • Dystopia in the Outlook Section

      Sunday's Outlook section had two pieces outlining pretty dystopic scenarios. The first was a back-to-the-land manifesto from someone who's building a self-sufficient farm in rural New Mexico in order to protect against the inevitable chaos of peak oil and resource wars and trade disruption and general technological collapse. I've never really understood that thinking.

    Latest

    How The End Of Don’t Ask Don’t Tell Will Force Gay Marriage
    How The End Of Don’t Ask Don’t Tell Will Force...
    Mark Zuckerberg Went To Korea To Ask Samsung To Make A Facebook Phone And Samsung Said No (FB)
    Mark Zuckerberg Went To Korea To Ask Samsung To...

    User login

    • Create new account
    • Request new password
    • Click on the icon to sign in with your social network login or enter your Bullfax.com login

    Our Blog

    • Oil Prices, India’s Inflation, Panama Canal and Bank Lending in Our News for Today 06/14/2013
    • SoftBank: Sprint to the finish
    • Royal Bank of Scotland, World Bank, European Stocks and Apple in Our Daily Round-Up for 06/13/2013

    Markets Map

    Markets Map

    Follow Us

    Follow Us on Facebook, Twitter, Google Plus and RSS LinkedIn Facebook Twitter Google Plus RSS
    S&P 500: 1649.61 -0.13% FTSE: 6348.82 -0.4% Nikk.: 13245.22 1.8% DAX: 8197.08 -0.4% HSI: 20986.891 -1.14% FX: EUR/GBP: 1.1682 USD/EUR: 1.3404 JPY/USD: 95.16 Commodities: Gold: 1373.80

    Bullfax.com - Market News & Analysis 2008-2011
    Contact Us | About Us | Terms & Conditions

    Follow Us on Facebook, Twitter, Google Plus and RSS LinkedIn Facebook Twitter Google Plus RSS .

    Secondary menu

    • Latest News
    • Top Rated
    • Most Popular
    • Archive
    • Discussions