Jump to Navigation
Home

Main menu

  • Home
  • News
  • Markets Map
  • Sentiments
  • Topics
  • Data
  • Comments
  • Images
  • Blog
  • About

Secondary menu

  • Latest News
  • Top Rated
  • Most Popular
  • Archive
  • Discussions
  • Bridge collapses in Washington state
  • McDonald's Most Caloric Item Ever
  • Bank’s Lobbyists Help in Drafting Bills
  • Hot girls on Auto Shanghai 2013 auto show
  • S&P 500 Snapshot: Rethinking The Risk Of QE Tapering
  • Google Faces Fresh U.S. Scrutiny Over Market Power
  • Twitter Digest: 2013-05-23
  • Wieners to Wunderbar: How Germany got cool
  • Kids' playground made from trash
  • Why youth are key to beating Boko Haram

    When Price Does Not Clear the Market

    Thu, 06/16/2011 - 06:30 EDT - EconBrowser
    • Comments
    • financial markets

    And other non-Neoclassical tales
    Finance and Development has a profile of one of my teachers, Nobel Laureate George Akerlof, written by Prakash Loungani. Akerlof's views are critical to recall in these times when some individuals think supply and demand are sufficient to answer all policy issues. Akerlof's research highlighted the role of information asymmetries that prevent prices for setting quantity demanded equal to quantity supplied. From the article
    While unemployment is the topic that has motivated him the most, it is his 1970 article showing how markets might break down in the presence of asymmetric (or unequal) information that won him the Nobel Prize. Indeed, if you play a game of word association with an economics PhD and say “Akerlof,” chances are the response will be “lemons.” This is because the example Akerlof gave was of used car markets, where sellers have better knowledge of whether their car is a good one or a “lemon.” The buyers’ best guess is that the car is of average quality, so they will only be willing to pay the price of a car of average quality. This means, however, that owners of good cars will not place their cars in the used car market. But that in turn lowers the average quality of cars on the market, causing buyers to revise downward their expectations of quality. Now even owners of moderately good cars are unable to sell, and so the market spirals toward collapse.

    Akerlof says that the problem dates back to one that has confronted horse traders over the ages: “If he wants to sell that horse, do I really want to buy it?” But problems of asymmetric information are present in most markets, particularly in financial markets. “This [recent financial] crisis gave us glaring examples,” says Akerlof. “Ordinary people thought they were buying homes, not the complex derivatives that they later realized they had ended up buying.”

    Akerlof says he chose the example of used cars to make his paper “more palatable” to U.S. readers. But his interest in the subject had been triggered when, during his stay in India in 1967–68, he noticed people’s difficulty obtaining credit. He kept this example in the paper, along with sections on how the “lemons principle” could also explain why the elderly had trouble obtaining insurance and why minorities had difficulty obtaining employment. All this proved too exotic for much of the academic market of the time; the paper was turned down by three leading journals before it was finally published in the Quarterly Journal of Economics.

    Today, the questions Akerlof tackled in the “lemons” paper are a staple of the academic diet. And Akerlof himself continues to push the frontiers on the study of such questions, most recently in Identity Economics, coauthored with Rachel Kranton, then at the University of Maryland. Akerlof’s son, Robby, carries on the tradition. A graduate of Yale—where Shiller was one of his professors—and Harvard, he is studying questions such as why corruption and the tolerance of it vary across corporations; what managers can do to increase the legitimacy of their authority (paying efficiency wages turns out to be one option); what accounts for an oppositional culture where minorities disparage the majority and are disparaged in turn; and what fuels protracted feuds between two parties.

    The insight that informational asymmetries abound in today's economy leads me to suspect that merely removing impediments to the activities of firms will lead to Pareto optimal solutions. Free markets are not necessarily competitive markets, even if one rules out externalities, and market imperfections (oligopoly, monopolistic competition). And yet, some people are proposing competition as the solution to health care and financial markets, both arguably pervaded by information asymmetries.

    Aklerof and Romer analyzed deregulation's impact (and subsequent "looting") in the runup to the S&L crisis, as I discussed in this post. It is a story that has great relevance for the most recent crisis, as Jeff Frieden and I document in our forthcoming book, Lost Decades (Norton, September).

    • Original article
    • Login or register to post comments
     

    Related

    • Who Needs a Nobel Laureate When We Have Google?

      I was debating on what to write about tonight–either the update on Nobel Prize winner Peter Diamond’s failed nomination to the Federal Reserve Board (with his very public withdrawal as shared via the New York Times), or Minnesota governor (and Republican presidential candidate) Tim Pawlenty’s speech on his “economic plan” (text of speech

    • FDI subsidies: Good for the taxpayer?

      A recent issue of Columbia Perspectives on FDI asks whether foreign direct investment subsidies are good or bad for the countries that offer them (see Investment incentives and the global competition for capital).

    • Nobel winner says bank sacking 'political'

      Bangladeshi Nobel laureate and micro-lending pioneer Muhammad Yunus claimed Monday his ousting from a high-profile bank job was a government power grab, as he awaited a court verdict on his dismissal.The 70-year-old -- who won the Nobel Peace Prize in 2006 for pioneering the concept of small cash loans -- said the government's move last week to sack him as managing director of Grameen Bank was politically motivated."They want to put their own person at the chair of the bank, a political person," Yunus told a Washington micro-lending conference via video link.

    • The F. A. Hayek Program for Advanced Study in Philosophy, Politics and Economics

      |Peter Boettke| I am pleased to announce the formal launch of the F. A. Hayek Program for Advanced Study in Philosophy, Politics and Economics (PPE) at the Mercatus Center at George Mason University. I hope you will find this website a useful gateway to information on our research and graduate education programs. 

    • How the Internet Created a Market For Lemons

      The Market for Lemons is one of the great economics papers of the past few decades. So good that it gained George Akerlof, its writer, a share of the Nobel Prize. The essential point is about information asymmetry. The seller of a used car knows much more about the quality of that car than does ...

    • Macroeconomics: Can Anyone Play This Game?

      I thought I might highlight this passage from an interview the Cleveland Fed conduct with Laurence Meyer, a former Fed governor who also founded the consulting firm Macroeconomic Advisers. The content of his assertions sound completely insane, and yet to the best of my knowledge are 100 percent true:

    • Peter Klein's PhD Course in Austrian Economics

      |Peter Boettke|

    • The Role of Government

      By James Kwak Last week Simon gave a talk sponsored by Larry Lessig’s center at Harvard. Afterward there was a dinner and then another question-and-answer session. Jedediah Purdy (another person to write a book while at Yale  Law School; he is now a professor at Duke’s law school) asked a question that I have rephrased as follows (the words are mine, not Purdy’s; I may have also distorted his original question so much that it is also mine):

    • Training Better Teachers

      Elizabeth Green has a brilliant piece in the NYT Magazine about efforts to find better ways to train teachers. The most important influence on student achievement seems to be their family background. After that, the thing that makes a big difference is the quality of their teacher. Some teachers consistently deliver much bigger-than-average gains in learning, and others deliver worse-than-average gains.

    Latest

    Mike Duffy wants to give Canadians ‘the whole story,’ calls for open public inquiry into expenses
    Mike Duffy wants to give Canadians ‘the whole...
    This Simple Email Got Tumblr's 5th Employee His Job
    This Simple Email Got Tumblr's 5th Employee...

    User login

    • Create new account
    • Request new password
    • Click on the icon to sign in with your social network login or enter your Bullfax.com login

    Our Blog

    • Tata Steel, ECB, China’s car market and European Corporate Tax in Our News for Today 05/24/2013
    • Pandora: the charm might fade away
    • Japanese Market, Indian Rupee, China’s Stocks and Oil Prices in Our Daily Round-Up for 05/23/2013

    Markets Map

    Markets Map

    Follow Us

    Follow Us on Facebook, Twitter, Google Plus and RSS LinkedIn Facebook Twitter Google Plus RSS
    S&P 500: 1650.51 -0.29% FTSE: 6643.93 -0.8% Nikk.: 14612.45 0.88% DAX: 8268.97 -1% HSI: 22618.67 -0.23% FX: EUR/GBP: 1.1657 USD/EUR: 1.2972 JPY/USD: 101.3435 Commodities: Gold: 1389.40

    Bullfax.com - Market News & Analysis 2008-2011
    Contact Us | About Us | Terms & Conditions

    Follow Us on Facebook, Twitter, Google Plus and RSS LinkedIn Facebook Twitter Google Plus RSS .

    Secondary menu

    • Latest News
    • Top Rated
    • Most Popular
    • Archive
    • Discussions