Jump to Navigation
Home

Main menu

  • Home
  • News
  • Markets Map
  • Sentiments
  • Topics
  • Data
  • Comments
  • Images
  • Blog
  • About

Secondary menu

  • Latest News
  • Top Rated
  • Most Popular
  • Archive
  • Discussions
  • Sudipta cash trail may lead to Singapore, Bangkok
  • Primero Mining: A Bet On Gold Returning To Bullish
  • ‘I don’t think the matter is going to go away’: Deputy...
  • AirAsia India launch seen in Q4, may order 50 more jets
  • Nitaqat law fall-out: 75,000 Indian workers and still...
  • Rich country investors return home for stable cash income
  • Why Jelly is good for small businesses
  • Abercrombie's decline in sales pummels its stock...
  • Danica Patrick From Race to Sponsorships
  • Billionaire investor apologises for saying women traders...

    What Does Quantitative Easing Mean for Banks?

    Wed, 11/03/2010 - 14:44 EDT - Busiconomics
    • Comments
    • economy

    The Federal Reserve today announced a new quantitative easing plan in which they will buy $600 billion of long-term Treasury securities. What does this mean for banks?Bank deposits and reserves will increase. Even if your bank does not sell securities directly to the Fed, some of your clients may be selling securities. Across the country, total bank deposits and reserves will increase. This will put many banks in the awkward position of earning less on their reserves than they pay. The Fed is paying banks 25 basis points on reserves; the FDIC is charging over 30 basis points to most banks for deposit insurance. (Your cost varies depending on the condition of your bank.) The key challenge for bankers is figuring out what to do with the inflow of deposits. There aren’t a lot of great options out there right now.Deposit growth will rise before loan demand increases. Real estate is largely moribund, though there are increasing opportunities to finance apartments. Commercial lending typically lags the business cycle by two years or so. It will gradually improve, though we have another six months or so before it really takes off.   That leaves consumer lending, primarily made through the big banks. Here the banking industry has two challenges. First, many of the most credit-worthy borrowers don’t care to borrow more money right now. Second, many of the people who would like to borrow are not credit worthy. I expect consumer lending to surmount these challenges as banks nervously ease up on credit standards, and consumers nervously put their toes back in the water.
    Bank Loan-Deposit Ratio This is the process whereby the quantitative easing will help. Milton Friedman famously said that the time lags in monetary policy are long and variable. A good rule of thumb these days is 12 months before the overall economy feels the benefit of quantitative easing—and even then, we’ll feel better growth but not normal times.For community banks, look for core deposit growth in the next few months, well in advance of loan growth.  Twelve months from now, however, loan volume should pick up in both commercial and real estate lending.Quantitative easing will be positive for the economy, but challenging for the banking industry during the time lag. My top advice to bankers is to carefully plan how they want to deal with higher deposits. In particular, do careful planning on where you want to expand loan volumes.

    • Original article
    • Login or register to post comments
     

    Related

    • What Does Quantitative Easing Mean for Banks?

      Dr. Bill Conerly submits: The Federal Reserve today announced a new quantitative easing plan in which they will buy $600 billion of long-term Treasury securities. What does this mean for banks?

    • The Fed's new policy tools

      We had to throw out our textbook descriptions of how monetary policy is implemented after the fall of 2008, as the Fed turned from its traditional tools to active use of large-scale asset purchases. A number of studies have now been conducted of the potential efficacy of these new policy tools. I surveyed some of the new studies last October. Today I'd like to discuss three new papers that have come out since then.

    • Bank Of Japan Gives 'Perfect Answer' With Its New Massive Monetary Easing Plan

      TOKYO (Reuters) - The Bank of Japan shocked markets on Thursday with a radical overhaul of its policymaking, adopting a new balance sheet target and pledging to double its government bond holdings in two years as it seeks to end nearly two decades of deflation.

    • Bernanke provokes mystery over Fed stimulus exit

      When Ben Bernanke asserted last month that the Federal Reserve doesn’t ever have to sell assets, he raised questions about how the central bank can withdraw its record monetary stimulus without stoking inflation.

    • Bernanke provokes mystery over Fed stimulus exit

      When Ben Bernanke asserted last month that the Federal Reserve doesn’t ever have to sell assets, he raised questions about how the central bank can withdraw its record monetary stimulus without stoking inflation.

    • Maximum Intervention Moves Into Overdrive; Foreign Banks can Fund themselves Cheaper in US Dollars than US Banks; Discount Rate Cut Coming Up?

      Steen Jakobsen, chief economist for Saxo Bank offers his take on the liquidity moves by global central bankers. Please consider Steen's Chronicle, Maximum Intervention Moves Into Overdrive

    • Has Quantitative Easing Actually Helped the Economy?

      Calafia Beach Pundit submits: The Federal Reserve's quantitative easing program began over two years ago, and it has since triggered waves of concern and countless forecasts (including mine) of rising inflation.

    • Should the Fed try to depress long-term yields further?

      I've been sharing with readers my recent research with Cynthia Wu, in which we found that the Fed could likely lower long-term interest rates further by buying more long-term securities, even though the short-term rate is essentially zero and even though the newly created reserves would simply sit idle in banks' accounts with the Fed. Here I'd like to take up the question of whether such a policy would be desirable.

    • Guest Contribution: The Liquidity Trap Does Not Make Monetary Policy Ineffective

      By Joseph E. Gagnon Today, we're fortunate to have Joe Gagnon, senior fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics, as a guest contributor.

    Latest

    ‘I don’t think the matter is going to go away’: Deputy mayor calls Rob Ford’s statement on crack allegations a ‘good first step’
    ‘I don’t think the matter is going to go away’:...
    New book is a fuddle-duddle-seeking missile aimed at shattering the enduring Trudeau myth
    New book is a fuddle-duddle-seeking missile aimed...

    User login

    • Create new account
    • Request new password
    • Click on the icon to sign in with your social network login or enter your Bullfax.com login

    Our Blog

    • Tata Steel, ECB, China’s car market and European Corporate Tax in Our News for Today 05/24/2013
    • Pandora: the charm might fade away
    • Japanese Market, Indian Rupee, China’s Stocks and Oil Prices in Our Daily Round-Up for 05/23/2013

    Markets Map

    Markets Map

    Follow Us

    Follow Us on Facebook, Twitter, Google Plus and RSS LinkedIn Facebook Twitter Google Plus RSS
    S&P 500: 1649.60 -0.06% FTSE: 6654.34 -0.64% Nikk.: 14612.45 0.88% DAX: 8305.32 -0.56% HSI: 22618.67 -0.23% FX: EUR/GBP: 1.1694 USD/EUR: 1.2935 JPY/USD: 101.175 Commodities: Gold: 1386.60

    Bullfax.com - Market News & Analysis 2008-2011
    Contact Us | About Us | Terms & Conditions

    Follow Us on Facebook, Twitter, Google Plus and RSS LinkedIn Facebook Twitter Google Plus RSS .

    Secondary menu

    • Latest News
    • Top Rated
    • Most Popular
    • Archive
    • Discussions