Jump to Navigation
Home

Main menu

  • Home
  • News
  • Markets Map
  • Sentiments
  • Topics
  • Data
  • Comments
  • Images
  • Blog
  • About

Secondary menu

  • Latest News
  • Top Rated
  • Most Popular
  • Archive
  • Discussions
  • Best Buy reports US sales drop
  • Yahoo's Mayer Says Tumblr Could Get Its Own Ad...
  • Jamie Dimon Wins! [Report]
  • CCI to seek more info from CAG on spectrum auctions
  • Bwin.Party Digital Entertainment's CEO Discusses Q1...
  • Vote Nears at J.P. Morgan
  • JPMorgan Appears to Avert Split in CEO/Chair Roles
  • Barcelona Is Ditching Its Ugly Creamsicle Jersey Next Year
  • Sprint Gets SoftBank Waiver to Consider Dish Offer
  • SkyWest picks Embraer over Bombardier for new jet order

    We just need some sort of sign

    Thu, 08/18/2011 - 14:52 EDT - The Economist - Free Exchange Blog
    • RDF10

    THE Fed's latest policy statement was confusing, even by Fed policy statement standards. The members of the Federal Open Market Committee clearly saw a darkening of the economic picture, likely to produce slower growth and lower inflation than they'd previously expected. And they clearly took action, changing the language of the statement to reflect that the federal funds rate target would most likely be held at the current, low level until 2013. What wasn't so clear, however, was just what the Fed expected that policy change to accomplish. Markets looked it over, thought about it one way and sold off, thought about it another way and bought back in, and then generally went on reading the financial papers, not sure what Bernanke and Co. were aiming for.Given this response, it's safe to say that whatever Mr Bernanke intended the policy to accomplish, its effect was only the mildest of support for the economy. And it's also not surprising that having been left by Mr Bernanke without a clear policy goal or action in mind, markets have gone on responding to bad news by projecting bad economic outcomes. Equities, which had been flat most of the week, dropped sharply today on a raft of bad data. Treasury yields are at record lows. Commodity prices keep dropping.You know, it's hard to be in a position of power at times like these. The stakes are high, and the path forward is uncertain. The thing is, markets are showing the way forward. The deeper the decline in Treasury yields, the clearer it is that markets are scared stiff about the growth outlook. And conveniently, governments can then borrow on incredible terms, using the proceeds to make overdue investments, thereby supporting growth in the short-term and the long-term! The American government can borrow at zero to negative cost at durations out to 10 years. There are always risks, to action and inaction alike, but as risks go, using cheap money to fix deteriorating infrastructure or provide health care to the unemployed or subsidise worker retraining or support research is an incredibly safe bet. In Britain, gilt yields have fallen to their lowest level since the Victorian era. As risks go, slightly easing the pace of fiscal austerity is an incredibly safe bet.What about the Fed, with its too-vague-to-be-effective attempt at additional easing? There's no doubt that many of the members of the FOMC, and especially the dissenters, worry that overaggressive policy could produce runaway inflation. To them I say, have no fear. Markets will warn you when they begin to expect runaway inflation. Just as they're now warning about significant downside risks to growth:Medium-term inflation expectations—the thing the Fed is supposed to be obsessing over—are well below the assumed target of about 2%, and they're falling. After years of this kind of thing, it's difficult to know what more to say. Markets and history alike are indicating the direction in which advanced economies are heading. We can't be completely certain about the nature of the recession and weak recovery, but we can be confident enough to know what general actions are necessary. As Peter Diamond says:[T]he argument about the aggregate demand side is academic, in the negative sense of the word. Current estimates I have seen of how much of the increase in unemployment from a few years ago is “structural,” rather than due to inadequate aggregate demand, still leaves enough need for aggregate demand stimulation that it is clear what direction is needed for further policies.It's hard to imagine that a failure to persuade is the problem. Instead, it seems as though our institutions are the issue; across advanced countries and eras, governments struggle to react appropriately to economic situations like the present. My concern is that we're all destined to repeat the mistakes of history, until by accident or exhaustion of alternatives we stumble upon the right set of policies—which, future historians will lament, were obvious all along. This process probably won't mean the end of the world. But it won't be pretty, either.

    • Original article
    • Login or register to post comments
     

    Related

    • The Fed acts without acting

      ONE truth that emerges clearly from the recent history of Federal Reserve monetary-policy action is that changing central bank policy goals is like steering the Titanic. You can see where the ship ought to go, and the captain himself might do his best to pilot it there, but the nature of the beast is that it simply won't turn on a dime. There are too many extremely cautious people influencing policy decisions and too much political and market scrutiny for that.

    • Federal Reserve sticks with stimulus and leaves interest rates unchanged

    • U.S. Fed announces fresh stimulus in new approach to support growth

      WASHINGTON — The Federal Reserve ramped up its stimulus to the economy on Wednesday, expressing disappointment with the pace of recovery in employment as contentious U.S. budget talks heighten uncertainty about the outlook. The central bank replaced a more modest stimulus program due to expire at year-end with a fresh round of Treasury purchases that will increase its balance sheet. It committed to monthly purchases of US$45-billion in Treasuries on top of the US$40-billion per month in mortgage-backed bonds it started buying in September.

    • Another reason the Fed should do more

      AMERICA would benefit from a higher inflation target, but it looks unlikely to get one. Luckily for those who want a more ambitious Federal Reserve, there are other reasons Ben Bernanke should do more.That the inflation target should rise is a policy a number of Fed-watching commentators (including my colleague) support. The idea is that higher inflation and inflation expectations would stimulate America’s economy.

    • The Fed acts ... just

      The Federal Reserve eased monetary policy to boost the flagging recovery, announcing a modest extension of "Operation Twist", that is the purchase of long-term bonds financed by the sale of short-term paper. The stock market initially sold off but has bounced back.  In its statement, the Fed said:

    • When will the Fed hike rates?

      TYLER COWEN points us to the blogger at Sober Look, who thinks markets aren't buying the Fed's low-rate communications:Misconceptions still persist that the Fed is on hold with respect to rates until at least late 2014. The markets would disagree. The Fed Funds futures have the first rate hike (25bp) centered around August of next year and the second hike (to 50bp) on July of 2014....

    • The Fed's communications problem

      LET'S take a break from patting the Fed on the back to talk about some of the potential difficulties inherent in the Fed's current communications strategy. At the Financial Times old ECB hand Lorenzo Bini Smaghi writes:

    • Can the Fed talk America out of a slump?

      AT LOT of American economic writers seem pretty glum about the state of the economy right now, and it's not that hard to understand why. May's employment figure was a big disappointment. Industrial production numbers show a big slowdown in activity over the past month or so. Forecasters are revising their projections for second quarter growth downward; once again, a quarter that was expected to produce a near-4% rate of annual growth may generate a figure closer to 2%. Nervousness has grown in recent days with signs of increasing trouble abroad.

    • Forecast for Bondholders: How the Fed's Dilemma Will Affect You

      Investment Directions submits: Yesterday, I discussed whether the Fed was paying attention to inflation’s apparent resurgence (“Tame Inflation Just Growled – Is the Fed Listening?”). Today, let’s talk about the box the Fed is in, what its choices are and how the direction chosen would affect bondholders.

    • "No rate hikes likely in 2010..."

      Despite the somewhat startling conclusion (at least to me), the implications are pretty straightforwardly arrive at. From Michael Rosenberg, Financial Conditions Watch (Bloomberg, Jan. 27, 2010) [not online]: Fed Funds Rate Outlook -- A Taylor Rule Perspective With U.S. real GDP growth moving back into positive territory in the second half of 2009 following four consecutive quarters of negative growth (see Figure 1), the economic forecasting community appears to be increasingly optimistic about the U.S.

    Latest

    Jamie Dimon Wins! [Report]
    Jamie Dimon Wins! [Report]
    MOBILE INSIGHTS: The Mobile Payment Wars Heat Up Again
    Yahoo's Mayer Says Tumblr Could Get Its Own...

    User login

    • Create new account
    • Request new password
    • Click on the icon to sign in with your social network login or enter your Bullfax.com login

    Our Blog

    • Did Iceland make it through the crisis?
    • Marks & Spenser, Bank Loans in China, Vodafone and Asian Stocks in Our News for Today 05/21/2013
    • Actavis to acquire Warner Chilcott in $5bn pharmaceutical deal

    Markets Map

    Markets Map

    Follow Us

    Follow Us on Facebook, Twitter, Google Plus and RSS LinkedIn Facebook Twitter Google Plus RSS
    S&P 500: 1669.92 0.22% FTSE: 6768.95 0.2% Nikk.: 15381.02 0.13% DAX: 8453.41 -0.03% HSI: 23366.369 -0.54% FX: EUR/GBP: 1.1763 USD/EUR: 1.287 JPY/USD: 102.735 Commodities: Gold: 1370.60

    Bullfax.com - Market News & Analysis 2008-2011
    Contact Us | About Us | Terms & Conditions

    Follow Us on Facebook, Twitter, Google Plus and RSS LinkedIn Facebook Twitter Google Plus RSS .

    Secondary menu

    • Latest News
    • Top Rated
    • Most Popular
    • Archive
    • Discussions