Jump to Navigation
Home

Main menu

  • Home
  • News
  • Markets Map
  • Sentiments
  • Topics
  • Data
  • Comments
  • Images
  • Blog
  • About

Secondary menu

  • Latest News
  • Top Rated
  • Most Popular
  • Archive
  • Discussions
  • Facebook snags 1m advertisers
  • Darrell Delamaide's Political Capital: Euro crisis...
  • New Eurofighter chief aims to make jet cheaper
  • GM eyes 10% China's luxury car market by '20
  • Rio Tinto rises after Australian job cuts as markets...
  • Chinese firm to buy UK yacht manufacturer
  • Matthew Lynn's London Eye: 5 ways to protect your...
  • Google asks US court to allow data query release
  • GVK's proposed Alpha project not viable: Study
  • Revival of Red Flag car brand

    The Trouble With Taxing Exclusively The Rich

    Thu, 04/07/2011 - 16:46 EDT - Mathew Yglesias
    • Comments
    • taxes
    • uncat

    In their sketch version of a budget (PDF) the Congressional Progressive Caucus makes a heroic effort to finance progressive government basically exclusively by raising taxes on rich people.
    Specifically:

    The big problem I have with this is that if you raise high-end marginal rates while leaving deductions alone, what you do is massively increase the value of the deductions. The home mortgage interest tax deduction, for example, is both distributively regressive and also economically damaging by shunting too much money into the housing sector. If wealthy people start paying a marginal income tax rate of 47 percent, then the incentive to overconsume housing becomes much more intense. A economically sound approach to the tax code needs to go after some of these deductions, and that means some middle class families will have to pay somewhat more.
    Not so much a problem, but an observation, about this plan is that it actually does implicitly recognize the non-viability of a rich people only strategy. After all, even though the legal incidence of these corporate tax changes is on the corporations, the reality is that some of the bite will be felt by middle class consumers of these firms’ products and middle class employees of the firms. We really shouldn’t be handing out so much corporate welfare to oil and gas companies. But it’s not like everyone working in the oil and gas industry is an evil fatcat, it’s mostly regular everyday folks. And that’s fine. But once you’re willing to concede the point that pursuing increased revenue in a sensible way will entail some sacrifice by some middle class people, you may as well apply that principle to the individual income tax as well as the corporate income tax.


    • Original article
    • Login or register to post comments
     

    Related

    • Bad Arguments Against Tax “Increases”

      By James Kwak

    • Bobby Jindal's New Tax Plan Could Crush Poor People In Louisiana

      Louisiana Governor Bobby Jindal has proposed an overhaul of taxation for the state of Louisiana that has many worried about the impact it could have on that state's low income citizens. 

    • Area Billionaire Threatens “Legal And Illegal Tax Avoidance” To Protect Comic Book Funds From Drum Circling Hippie Freeloader Idiots

    • A Lot Of New Yorkers Think They Deserve A Special Tax Break

      The looming fiscal cliff has drawn a lot of attention to the tax rates that people across the country pay.

    • Raising Taxes on Millionaires Is a Piece of Cake–But Which Kind?

    • Getting Specific On Taxes And Growth

      As I was writing last week, one key question for those who believe that higher taxes on high-income people will lead to sharply reduced economic growth is where’s the growth given the substantial reductions in average tax burdens and the giant reductions in marginal tax rates. Another way of putting it might be to ask for some more specifics. How, exactly, are higher tax rates supposed to impoverish the country?

    • Who Benefits from Tax Expenditures?

      By James Kwak Ezra Klein points out a new tax expenditure database from The Pew Charitable Trusts. More attention to tax expenditures — exceptions in the tax code that reduce tax revenue or, put another way, subsidies channeled through the tax system* — is always a good thing. But Klein also says something interesting that I don’t agree with:

    • Pete Peterson and Taxes

    • The Money Problem, Cont'd

      The more people I talk to and the more reporting I read, the more convinced I am that health-care reform still faces the money problem. The unions hate the excise tax because it increases the cost of their benefits. Senators from high-cost states hate the excise tax because it increases the cost of their benefits relative to those in lower-cost states. The Republicans are attacking the excise tax because, well, it seems like the thing to do.

    Latest

    ANALYST: The Next Leg Of Volatility Will Start In The Days Ahead
    ANALYST: The Next Leg Of Volatility Will Start In...
    Markets Are Going Nowhere Ahead Of Huge Day For The Fed
    Markets Are Going Nowhere Ahead Of Huge Day For...

    User login

    • Create new account
    • Request new password
    • Click on the icon to sign in with your social network login or enter your Bullfax.com login

    Our Blog

    • Oil Prices, India’s Inflation, Panama Canal and Bank Lending in Our News for Today 06/14/2013
    • SoftBank: Sprint to the finish
    • Royal Bank of Scotland, World Bank, European Stocks and Apple in Our Daily Round-Up for 06/13/2013

    Markets Map

    Markets Map

    Follow Us

    Follow Us on Facebook, Twitter, Google Plus and RSS LinkedIn Facebook Twitter Google Plus RSS
    S&P 500: 1651.81 0.77% FTSE: 6365.13 -0.14% Nikk.: 13245.22 1.8% DAX: 8234.98 0.07% HSI: 20986.891 -1.14% FX: EUR/GBP: 1.1668 USD/EUR: 1.3388 JPY/USD: 95.0635 Commodities: Gold: 1368.20

    Bullfax.com - Market News & Analysis 2008-2011
    Contact Us | About Us | Terms & Conditions

    Follow Us on Facebook, Twitter, Google Plus and RSS LinkedIn Facebook Twitter Google Plus RSS .

    Secondary menu

    • Latest News
    • Top Rated
    • Most Popular
    • Archive
    • Discussions