Ross Douthat's case against cap-and-trade

 

I prefer to call it a carbon tax, while admitting the two are sometimes equivalent.  Here is Ross's key passage:

Spending 1 percent of our G.D.P. as a hedge against catastrophe might make sense; spending the same amount without any prospect of actually getting that insurance policy seems like idealistic folly. And so far, when it comes to actual mechanisms whereby Waxman-Markey becomes a model for the developing world, all I’ve heard from the left are neoconservative-style arguments about how “if the world’s leading power leads, everyone else will follow,” and visions of a carbon trade war between the West and China. Neither seems persuasive.
That's a strong argument, but the case for a carbon tax remains threefold:
1. Even if we cut government spending a lot, some taxes will have to go up.  This seems like the least bad tax to raise or create, since it has some chance of producing a better outcome.  It's hard to say that about most of the other potential tax boosts.  I'd also cut the tax deduction for mortgage interest, of course.  That too could improve the quality of outcomes.
2. Given that American policies are contributing to a (probabilistic) climate-based "attack" on Bangladesh and numerous other countries, there is a deonlogical case for trying to stop that attack.  It is a libertarian rights violation issue, driven by all of us in our role as consumers.   
It is a practical response -- but to me a morally weak one -- to argue "We Americans are the wealthiest country in the world but we're not competent enough to stop our contribution to the problem, so we're not going to try."  I get the logic, and I even agree with the predictive pessimism, but I'm not comfortable staying put with that as my final position.
3. A carbon tax might lead to a new green technology, with high upfront costs and low marginal costs.  Some of the rest of the world might then adopt the technology, even if those countries don't ever adopt a carbon tax.  In the short run this seems a little pie-in-the-sky, but in the longer run is it so crazy?  Haven't the Chinese adopted most of our other technological innovations?
That all said, I still don't like Waxman-Markey and in that regard I agree with Ross.  The bill seems to bureaucratize the energy sector, forgo most of the revenue opportunities, produce massive time consistency problems (postpone real adjustment and then give out more permits over time), and all without getting public buy-in to the idea of higher carbon prices. 
I'll also stress -- again -- that a carbon tax needs to be combined with the strong deregulation of the energy sector, and the weakening of NIMBY, in particular for wind power.
p.s. I hear less often these days about the "global cooling trend."

Related

  • Yes, it is showing already in Leon, Nicaragua, as Bryan Caplan had predicted.  You should see it.  Cameron has absorbed a lot from Princess Mononoke.  The aliens don't seem to trade much or accumulate capital.  Like the Olympics ceremony in Beijing, it raises the bar for a lot of subsequent efforts.  The crowd seemed unmoved by the theme of "las indigenas."  It has interesting themes on disability and also the diversity of intelligences.  The three hours go by very quickly.  It's not perfect.  Peopl

  • Political jobs would be torture for most people.  You have no freedom.  You are underpaid and over-bugged.  You lose a lot of your privacy.  You have to stop writing emails or saying what you think.  You don't get to read many good books or go for many quiet walks.  It's hard to be a non-conformist.  And so on. Yet it's really hard to get top political jobs.  So who gets them?  People who truly, deeply love the power.

  • That's the excellent bagel and smoked fish shop at 3rd Ave., just north of 50th St. I order my bagel from a gentleman with a thick New York accent and he eyes me suspiciously.  Finally he grunts out, in a tone slightly less than that of accusation: Server: "Where are you from?"

  • What are the exact conditions for counting "transhumanism" as having been attained?  Would you rather have a worse trip with better memories, or a more fun trip with fewer memories?  Why do some Senators act so obnoxiously to their subordinates?  Why don't more people from Hollywood go into politics?  From here on in, what is the best case scenario for your life?  Does it increase the productivity of a man if he marries a very religious woman?  If so, through what mechanism?  If China starts first with explicit genetic engineering, doe

  • If there's one lesson from the health care debacle, it is that Waxman-Markey was and is a dead end.  Many of us objected to the bill on the grounds that it supports a lot of phony offsets for twenty years, imposes lots of costs and regulation in the meantime, and then never really does much to help climate change, given the difficulties of political precommitment.  I believe that people with these objections, such as myself, were viewed as "obstructionists" by many or as people who were simply looking for an excuse not to support the bill.  But the idea

  • I have never heard a market-oriented economist argue that a rise in the minimum wage boosts the demand for labor.  You might try this argument: "The government is certifying that these workers are worth this much.  The government is defining the market price.  Entrepreneurs will believe that price and hire workers in the expectation of finding an equivalent or even superior marginal product.  The government said that was the right price." 

  • We offer our apologies for the inconvenience.  Nonetheless this is my chance to discuss all the topics which otherwise lie relatively fallow on MR.

  • Michael Weintraub asks: What are your favorite songs about technology? In my own thinking I have limited the universe of cases to those whose lyrics deal explicitly with technological innovations and their cultural effects, along the lines of Paul Simon's "Boy in the Bubble" or the Talking Heads' "(Nothing But) Flowers."

  • Study this model and try to improve on it.  Here is further historical information.

  • I haven't finished perusing the sources you all sent to me, but the debate is racing beyond where I started, so I will report in midstream.  My current impressions are the following:1. Whether you agree with them or not, there are reputable studies showing aggregate benefits from a significant cutback in carbon emissions.2. Waxman-Markey makes only a very small dent in the overall climate problem. 

 
S&P 500: 1104.18 0.48% |FTSE: 5494.16 1.17% |Nikk.: 9279.81 1.95% |DAX: 6221.52 0.92% |HSI: 21215.311 0.23% |
FX: EUR/GBP: 1.2171 | USD/EUR: 1.265 | JPY/USD: 84.215 | Commodities: Gold: 1245.30 | Crude - CLH09.NYM: 0.00 |