CNBC ran a story yesterday with the headline "The rich do not pay the most taxes, they pay ALL the taxes." The story has thousands of Facebook shares. And its premise is completely false. The article goes on to present data regarding the federal personal income tax, which is indeed paid almost entirely by people with high incomes. People with low incomes pay negative federal personal income taxes (that is, the government sends them checks) because of the earned income tax credit.
Wealthy households would face new taxes on property and other assets under German plans to prop up the struggling eurozone.
Senior advisers to Chancellor Angela Merkel are pushing for better-off households to pay towards the cost of any future bailouts for the weaker members of the single currency.
The proposals, from members of Germany’s council of economic experts, raise the prospect of taxes being imposed on property in a country like Spain if its government was forced to seek a bail-out.
The coalition’s confusion over its plan to remove child benefit from people in the 40% tax band raises an issue that all politicians would rather ignore: namely, the structure of marginal taxes.
The problem with withdrawing child benefit is that someone earning just under £42,745 faces a massive marginal tax rate because she would lose child benefit if she gets a pay rise.
Felix Salmon and Kevin Drum ponder the American middle class’ implacable opposition to taxing the rich as a means of closing the budget deficit. Their comments are interesting, but I’m seeking evidence that any such opposition exists.
By James Kwak
Christina and David Romer’s new paper, “The Incentive Effects of Marginal Tax Rates: Evidence from the Interwar Era,” is available as an NBER working paper (if you are so lucky). Given the current debates about taxes, the paper is likely to garner some attention.