Jump to Navigation
Home

Main menu

  • Home
  • News
  • Markets Map
  • Topics
  • Data
  • Comments
  • Images
  • Blog
  • About

Secondary menu

  • Latest News
  • Top Rated
  • Most Popular
  • Archive
  • Discussions
  • Report: North Korea launches short-range missiles
  • Thieves steal red-carpet jewels
  • North Korea rattles saber again
  • Obama’s budget would cut $1 trillion from US deficit
  • France signs same-sex marriage bill
  • Memories of fighting for N. Korea
  • Aldrin: To the Moon and beyond!
  • US Energy Revolution Gathers Pace
  • Ohio kidnap police
  • Barack Obama seeks to cut Afghan war spending by 10%

    Research Desk responds: What would the stimulative impact of a payroll tax holiday be?

    Tue, 07/27/2010 - 18:15 EDT - Ezra Klein - Washington Post
    • Comments
    • Stimulus

    By Dylan Matthews

    FormerSwingVoter asks:

    Any idea what the economic impact of an employee-only payroll tax holiday would be? Since it’s a Republican idea, it might actually stand a chance of passing, assuming they didn't actually call it “stimulus".

    As always, Moody's Mark Zandi has the economic impact estimates (PDF) you're looking for. Read here for a full look at Zandi's evaluation of stimulus proposals, and here for a look at the methodology he uses to calculate how effective each proposal is.

    Zandi's most recent number estimate of the per-dollar economic impact of a payroll tax holiday is $1.24. This is a relatively high figure, but there are a number of better options, including expanding food stamps, work share programs, direct aid to states and a jobs tax credit. FormerSwingVoter proposes a payroll tax holiday just on the employee side; this makes up half of revenue from Social Security taxes, with employer contributions making up the rest. OMB figures (PDF) place Social Security tax revenue in Fiscal 2011 at $674 billion, so a full payroll tax holiday for employees would cost $337 billion. Multiplying this by the $1.24 bang-for-buck estimate should give a rough idea of the economic impact of the proposal; I included partial tax holidays as well, as a full holiday would probably be too expensive to pass:

    stimulative_impact_of_a_employee_payroll_tax_holiday.pngAs Zandi's numbers suggest, the stimulative benefit is just slightly greater than the budgetary cost. As an editorial aside, I would dispute FormerSwingVoter's belief that this would appeal more to Republican legislators. Given that most resistance to additional stimulus is driven by, or at least coached in, anti-deficit rhetoric, and those focused on the deficit tend to also be very focused on entitlement solvency, anything that increases the Social Security deficit and damages the trust fund is likely to face opposition.

    In fact, the Heritage Foundation released a paper opposing the HIRE Act, which is a very modest payroll tax holiday for newly hired workers, on just these grounds, which could be influential among Republican members of Congress. Maybe Ben Nelson and Olympia Snowe would come around to an expanded holiday, but I doubt this would be any more popular than any other jobs proposal Senate Democrats could propose. With better options, such as work sharing or food stamps expansion, available, it's not clear to me that the focus should be on payroll tax relief.




    Social Security - Mark Zandi - Moody - Employment - Tax

    • Original article
    • Login or register to post comments
     

    Related

    • Research desk: What's a dollar of stimulus worth?

      By Dylan Matthews BHeffernan1 asks:

    • Research Desk responds: Is unemployment insurance stimulative?

      By Dylan Matthews Patrick_M wants to know whether fellow commenter Kevin_Willis is right in stating:

    • Since When Is a Payroll Tax Holiday Fiscally Responsible? Since Alice Said So.

      I have to admit that when I first heard about the payroll tax holiday part of the Rivlin-Domenici (Bipartisan Policy Center) deficit reduction package, I gasped with disbelief and said “what?!” Nearly $700 billion in deficit-financed tax cuts in one year is part of a plan to get back to fiscal sustainability?

    • Research desk explains: How effective would deficit-neutral stimulus be?

      By Dylan Matthews

    • Considering Better Alternatives to Extension of the Bush Tax Cuts for More Stimulus

      The key word in the title of this post, from my perspective, is “alternatives”–not “additions.”  The Obama Administration is reportedly considering some new proposals for a variety of business tax cuts that they believe would be particularly effective in creating jobs quickly.  As the AP’s Julie Pace reports:

    • Research desk responds: What could we swap a VAT or carbon tax with?

      By Dylan Matthews jackjudge4000yahoocom asks:

    • Tax Cuts to Help America’s Businesses Hire and Grow

      President Obama held a press conference today to continue his fight for Congress to pass the American Jobs Act. He explained what needs to happen to boost economic growth in the United States. One of the key proposals are tax cuts for small businesses. The President’s plan includes new tax cuts to businesses that provide immediate incentives for firms to hire and invest. These tax cuts would be available to all businesses, regardless of size, but are designed to target their impact towards the smallest businesses. Key elements of his proposal are: A payroll tax cut to businesses, with a focus on small employers ($65 billion in combination with the payroll tax holiday for new wages)A complete payroll tax holiday for new jobs or wage increasesExtend 100 percent business expensing through 2012 ($5 billion)Help entrepreneurs and small businesses access capital and grow A payroll tax cut to businesses, with a focus on small employers ($65 billion in combination with the payroll tax holiday for new wages) The President’s plan will extend the payroll tax cut to firms by cutting in half their payroll tax on the first $5 million in payroll. Next year, instead of paying 6.2 percent on their payroll expenses, firms would pay only 3.1 percent. The President’s plan would provide tax cuts for all firms, with focused relief on the 98 percent with less than $5 million in payroll. How It Would Work for a Typical Firm: A construction firm with 50 workers earning an average of $50,000 a year – for a total payroll of $2.5 million – would receive a payroll tax cut of 3.1% of its total payroll, or about $80,000. The firm’s workers would receive an average tax cut of about $1,500 a year from the employee side payroll tax cut in the President’s plan.

    • Research Desk responds: Could raising the income cap save Social Security?

      By Dylan Matthews jpeg asks:

    • Research desk responds: How the U.S. distorts the playing field

      By Dylan Matthews Andrew36 asks:

    Latest

    The Hunt for Thieves With the FBI's Art Theft Force
    The Hunt for Thieves With the FBI's Art...
    The Deep Sea Dive for 100 Billion Barrels of Oil
    The Deep Sea Dive for 100 Billion Barrels of Oil

    User login

    • Create new account
    • Request new password
    • Click on the icon to sign in with your social network login or enter your Bullfax.com login

    Our Blog

    • Aviva steps up drive for cost cuts
    • Food Demand, JM Financial, UK Startups Incubator and Sina in Our News for Today 05/17/2013
    • Budget black hole at heart of George Osborne’s finances

    Markets Map

    Markets Map

    Follow Us

    Follow Us on Facebook, Twitter, Google Plus and RSS LinkedIn Facebook Twitter Google Plus RSS
    S&P 500: 1667.47 1.02% FTSE: 6723.06 0.52% Nikk.: 15138.12 0.67% DAX: 8398.00 0.33% HSI: 23082.68 0.17% FX: EUR/GBP: 1.1821 USD/EUR: 1.2833 JPY/USD: 103.165 Commodities: Gold: 1360.15

    Bullfax.com - Market News & Analysis 2008-2011
    Contact Us | About Us | Terms & Conditions

    Follow Us on Facebook, Twitter, Google Plus and RSS LinkedIn Facebook Twitter Google Plus RSS .

    Secondary menu

    • Latest News
    • Top Rated
    • Most Popular
    • Archive
    • Discussions