Jump to Navigation
Home

Main menu

  • Home
  • News
  • Markets Map
  • Sentiments
  • Topics
  • Data
  • Comments
  • Images
  • Blog
  • About

Secondary menu

  • Latest News
  • Top Rated
  • Most Popular
  • Archive
  • Discussions
  • Big Ticket Buffet(t): The World's Most Expensive...
  • Cazenove-Schroders merger: How the funds will be affected
  • IRS Official Denies Invokes Fifth
  • Women Choose Smartphones Over Sex
  • U.S. existing home sales highest in almost 3-1/2 years
  • Iceland forms center-right govt, halts EU talks
  • Spirit Airlines Comes In Dead Last In Latest Ratings, CEO...
  • Should Apple just write a big check to the IRS?
  • Canadian home building to plunge 30% by 2015, costing the...
  • Boeing says 787 battery retrofits to be done by next week

    Mark Pennington's Robust Political Economy: Classical Liberalism and the Future of Public Policy

    Sun, 03/06/2011 - 20:23 EDT - Coordination Problem
    • Comments

    |Peter Boettke|
    I started to use the term "robust political economy" to describe my synthesis of the Austrian school analysis of market process analysis and the knowledge/calculation problem, and the Public choice analysis of the political process and the problem of opportunism/rent-seeking sometime in the 1980s.  It is evident both in my The Political Economy of Soviet Socialism: The Formative Years (1990) and Why Perestroika Failed: The Politics and Economics of Socialist Transformation (1993).  But I made a very explicit effort to push this as agenda in economics and political economy in a review of Joseph Stiglitz's Whither Socialism? that was published in the Journal of Economic Literature, I developed the idea in my introduction to my 3 volume reference work entitled "Which Enlightenment, Whose Liberalism", and Pete Leeson and I wrote an article on the concept of robust political economy that develops the argument probably the fullest in my writings. The core of the idea in Austrian economics can be found, I would argue, in Human Action, p. 692. 
    I should point out that my colleague David Levy has also stressed the issue of "robustness" in political economy, and as far as I know it was from David that I very well might have first heard of the idea when I was a graduate student listening to David talk about ideal estimators and robust estimators and perhaps catching only 20% of what he argued in real time, but eventually coming to appreciate his perspective as the years following graduate school passed.
    I have talked about this idea at various FEE and IHS seminars since the early 1990s.  I was told by Mark Pennington, that it was hearing one of those lectures at IHS that the idea of writing a book on the future of public policy that took the robustness idea seriously and used to analyze the major critiques of the market economy.  So as an editor of the book series, New Thinking in Political Economy I was thrilled when Mark submitted his manuscript to me for publication, and even more thrilled when Edward Elgar agreed to publish the book simultaneously in paperback so that the work would be more affordable than the more traditional hardback editions.
    Mark's book, Robust Political Economy: Classical Liberalism and the Future of Public Policy has now been published, and Mark is on the lecture circuit summarizing his work.  IEA had a book launch for Mark last month, and now the CATO Institute will have a book talk on Tuesday at 4:00pm.

    • Original article
    • Login or register to post comments
     

    Related

    • Robust Political Economy and Black Swans

      |Peter Boettke|

    • MIses, Equilibrium and the Problem of Misplaced Concreteness

      |Peter Boettke| In his 1922 book Socialism, Mises argued that in the stationary state of equilibrium there would be no problem of economic calculation.  This theme is repeated again in Human Action.  But assuming this establishes the theoretical possibility of economic calculation under socialism commits two fundamental errors: (1) misplaced concreteness, and (2) disregard for the social institutions that are required for economic calculation.

    • Central Banking and Knowledge Problems

      |Peter Boettke| Anthony Evans has an excellent piece on why central bank policy leads to frustration even under the best of circumstances.  In the process he discusses the work of Henderson and Hummel, as well as Sumner, and takes their argument at face value, but shows that even granting that, these arguments miss the fundamental point that:

    • Peter Klein's PhD Course in Austrian Economics

      |Peter Boettke|

    • Austrian Economics and the Secondary Literature

      |Peter Boettke|

    • New Spanish Volume of Interviews with Austrians

      Steven Horwitz

    • Case Selection in Qualitative Research in Political Economy

      |Peter Boettke|At the recent IHS conference there was a student presentation challenging the work that Pete Leeson and I have done on "Robust Political Economy".  During my lecture at Comparative Historical research as well as my discussion group on anarchism as a progressive research program, there were questions about case selection and comparative assessment.

    • Weekend Report: IHS Edition

      |Peter Boettke|

    • Book Culture or Journal Culture -- Which Are We?

      |Peter Boettke|

    • Only You Can Decide: Behavioral Economics, Neuroscience, and Austrian Economics

      |Peter Boettke|

    Latest

    Big Ticket Buffet(t): The World's Most Expensive Dinner Guests
    Big Ticket Buffet(t): The World's Most...
    How Will People Without Bank Accounts Pay For Health Insurance?
    How Will People Without Bank Accounts Pay For...

    User login

    • Create new account
    • Request new password
    • Click on the icon to sign in with your social network login or enter your Bullfax.com login

    Our Blog

    • ICBC/Goldman Sachs: farewell
    • Japan’s budget deficit, Rolls-Royce, Raytheon and Sony in Our Daily Round-Up for 05/22/2013
    • Apple chief Tim Cook defends tax practices and denies avoidance

    Markets Map

    Markets Map

    Follow Us

    Follow Us on Facebook, Twitter, Google Plus and RSS LinkedIn Facebook Twitter Google Plus RSS
    S&P 500: 1678.14 0.54% FTSE: 6835.17 0.46% Nikk.: 15627.26 1.58% DAX: 8515.63 0.51% HSI: 23261.08 -0.45% FX: EUR/GBP: 1.1671 USD/EUR: 1.2889 JPY/USD: 103.4285 Commodities: Gold: 1375.45

    Bullfax.com - Market News & Analysis 2008-2011
    Contact Us | About Us | Terms & Conditions

    Follow Us on Facebook, Twitter, Google Plus and RSS LinkedIn Facebook Twitter Google Plus RSS .

    Secondary menu

    • Latest News
    • Top Rated
    • Most Popular
    • Archive
    • Discussions