Jump to Navigation
Home

Main menu

  • Home
  • News
  • Markets Map
  • Topics
  • Data
  • Comments
  • Images
  • Blog
  • About

Secondary menu

  • Latest News
  • Top Rated
  • Most Popular
  • Archive
  • Discussions
  • Auto engineers too few or just harder to find?
  • Noted for May 19, 2013
  • These Cloud Stocks Can Fly: Pros
  • Kidnap victim told cops 'don't let me go'
  • Here's How A Successful Lawyer Knew For Sure She Was...
  • Will Ferrell Wants You To Stay Classy In A New '...
  • U.S. pointing a gun at democracy
  • JPMorgan: Short-Term And Long-Term Considerations
  • Carlsbad California is Very Nice
  • Suicide bombings spark violent protest

    Manufacturing Doesn't Need Special Tax Treatment

    Wed, 04/25/2012 - 10:24 EDT - Dr. Mark J. Perry
    • RDF10

    Nobel economist Gary Becker on why special treatment for manufacturing is misguided: "U.S. President Barack Obama, in his State of the Union address, advocated special tax breaks and support for the manufacturing sector. I do not see any more convincing case for subsidies to manufacturing than there was for the special treatment of agriculture during the long decline in farm employment. Most of the arguments made in support of privileges for manufacturing could be made for services and other sectors of the economy. For example, although certain manufacturing industries have had high rates of productivity advance, so too has mining, such as through the development of fracking techniques. The most important technological advance of the past several decades has been the computer and the Internet, for these gave birth to email, word processing, apps, online sales and social networks like Facebook and Twitter. Instead of singling out manufacturing for special privileges, the U.S. government should get behind certain general policies. High on the list would be raising the rate of growth of the American economy, for this will tend to create jobs in most sectors of the economy. More government support may be justified for basic research in science and other areas that would also benefit all sectors, not just manufacturing. Local and state governments, along perhaps with the federal government, could try to reduce the dismally high dropout rates from American high schools. Dropouts have trouble finding good jobs even in the best of times, and they suffer the most during recessions. Many other steps can be taken to help the American economy, especially by limiting the growth of entitlements and the federal budget. None of the steps to improve the economy involve favoring manufacturing employment and the manufacturing sector. The call by many for special treatment of manufacturing jobs is basically misguided." MP: Another reason that special treatment (e.g., tax breaks) for the manufacturing sector is misguided is that the industry earned record profits last year, see chart above.  When some industries like major integrated oil and gas earn record profits, there are calls in Washington for "windfall profits taxes," so the typical political logic would now be calling for higher taxes on manufacturers, not special tax breaks.  But then the term "political logic" is probably an oxymoron.  HT: Dan Greller

    • Original article
    • Login or register to post comments
     

    Related

    • Nobel Economist: Mexico's Economic Boom Will Make The Immigration Debate Irrelevant

      For several years now, net migration from Mexico has fallen to zero. What's going on?

    • The Decline or Demise U.S. Farming?

      In this post on manufacturing's declining share of GDP

    • About That State and Local Tax Deduction

      By James Kwak A couple of days ago I criticized Mitt Romney for thinking that eliminating the deductions for mortgages on second homes and for state and local taxes would pay for his 20 percent rate cuts. But there’s a more important general point to be made.

    • Acting Secretary Blank Talks Administration Support for American Manufacturing

      Guest blog post by Dr. Rebecca Blank, Acting Secretary of the U.S. Department of Commerce.I just returned from the White House Business Council American Economic Competitiveness Forum on Manufacturing where I had an opportunity to hear from a group of American manufacturers—representing businesses of all sizes from across the country—about how the Obama Administration can continue to support them as they build things here and sell them everywhere. As we have seen in recent months, manufacturing is one of the bright spots for our economy. Over the past 2 ½ years, more than half-a-million manufacturing jobs have been created in the U.S. – the strongest job growth in that sector since the 1990s.  In fact, just last month, an additional 25,000 new manufacturing jobs were added.In terms of production, manufacturing output is up 20 percent since 2009, and increased again in July. One manufacturing sector that has been consistently strong is the motor vehicles and parts industry, which has added 165,000 jobs since June 2009— a sector that might not even exist in the US today if not for the assistance this Administration gave to the U.S. auto industry in 2009.This matters because we know that manufacturing jobs are good jobs that pay more than average and provide greater benefits. They strengthen economic security for middle class families.There is a powerful link between America’s ability to make things and America’s ability to innovate, compete, and create good jobs. We have come to realize that you can’t separate innovation and production—they have to sit near each other.  Manufacturers perform 70 percent of all private sector R&D, investing in and producing technological advances that accounted for 90 percent of U.S. patents.  Economic research indicates that innovation – in new products or new processes – was central to three-quarters of the nation’s economic growth since World War II and it is not an accident that the manufacturing sectors where America is most competitive are all advanced manufacturing, where new technologies, new products or new production processes are central to the success of specific firms.

    • Is it Barack Obama's economy?

      A COLLEAGUE at Democracy in America cites Paul Krugman writing:What do I mean by saying that this is already a Republican economy? Look first at total government spending — federal, state and local. Adjusted for population growth and inflation, such spending has recently been falling at a rate not seen since the demobilization that followed the Korean War.

    • Social Networks Pursue Mobile Ad Dollars, E-Commerce

      By Diane Mermigas:The fledgling mobile transactions market, which some experts expect to reach $1 trillion globally by 2015, is about to get a hyper-boost from Facebook (FB), Twitter, Square and other social media players that consider e-sales the new end game.

    • Quote of the Day on U.S. Manufacturing

      UT-San Diego -- “When you look at the full cost of doing business abroad, U.S. factories can compete on price, delivery and quality. People would be surprised to learn how many things we still manufacture in the U.S.

    • Is USC Hybrid High a Solution the Dropout Epidemic?

      My forthcoming documentary, Crotty's Kids, shows how debate and mentorship improve inner city dropout rates. In previous posts, I've noted how solving the urban dropout epidemic, particularly if dropouts finish high school and graduate college in a STEM field, will dramatically improve our unemployment and deficit crises. Now it seems that my L.A.

    • A Utilization-adjusted Measure of Productivity: Implications for the Output Gap

      John Fernald and Kyle Matoba of the San Francisco Fed have just released a utilization adjusted total factor productivity series. The importance of this development is clearly laid out by the authors: This Economic Letter looks at potential output from the perspective of growth accounting, which assesses some of the key supply-side factors determining sustainable, noninflationary potential output.

    • A Utilization-adjusted Measure of Productivity: Implications for the Output Gap

      John Fernald and Kyle Matoba of the San Francisco Fed have just released a utilization adjusted total factor productivity series. The importance of this development is clearly laid out by the authors: This Economic Letter looks at potential output from the perspective of growth accounting, which assesses some of the key supply-side factors determining sustainable, noninflationary potential output.

    Latest

    Here's How A Successful Lawyer Knew For Sure She Was A Sociopath
    Here's How A Successful Lawyer Knew For Sure...
    It’s Official: Gold Is Now The Most Hated Asset Class
    It’s Official: Gold Is Now The Most Hated Asset...

    User login

    • Create new account
    • Request new password
    • Click on the icon to sign in with your social network login or enter your Bullfax.com login

    Our Blog

    • Aviva steps up drive for cost cuts
    • Food Demand, JM Financial, UK Startups Incubator and Sina in Our News for Today 05/17/2013
    • Budget black hole at heart of George Osborne’s finances

    Markets Map

    Markets Map

    Follow Us

    Follow Us on Facebook, Twitter, Google Plus and RSS LinkedIn Facebook Twitter Google Plus RSS
    S&P 500: 1667.47 1.02% FTSE: 6723.06 0.52% Nikk.: 15138.12 0.67% DAX: 8398.00 0.33% HSI: 23082.68 0.17% FX: EUR/GBP: 1.1821 USD/EUR: 1.2833 JPY/USD: 103.165 Commodities: Gold: 1360.15

    Bullfax.com - Market News & Analysis 2008-2011
    Contact Us | About Us | Terms & Conditions

    Follow Us on Facebook, Twitter, Google Plus and RSS LinkedIn Facebook Twitter Google Plus RSS .

    Secondary menu

    • Latest News
    • Top Rated
    • Most Popular
    • Archive
    • Discussions