Jump to Navigation
Home

Main menu

  • Home
  • News
  • Markets Map
  • Topics
  • Data
  • Comments
  • Images
  • Blog
  • About

Secondary menu

  • Latest News
  • Top Rated
  • Most Popular
  • Archive
  • Discussions
  • IPL Spot fixing: ICC supports BCCI steps to deal with...
  • On the Job: Don't kiss off the Q&A
  • China and India coexist peacefully: Li Keqiang
  • Angry JP Morgan shareholders seek to strip Jamie Dimon of...
  • Tea party looks to take advantage of moment
  • 80% Of Media Buyers Think Google UK Isn't Telling...
  • Intel Moves Into New Revenue Streams
  • Report: Yahoo Nearing $1.1B Acquisition of Tumblr
  • Federer's New Haircut Doesn't Help -- Nadal...
  • ABC Reporter 'Regrets' Incorrect Reporting At...

    Left, right & the euro

    Fri, 12/09/2011 - 10:02 EDT - Stumbling and Mumbling
    • Comments

    Varun Chandra’s post raises a question: could it be that, in Britain at least, the left and right’s attitudes to the euro are the wrong way round?
    To see what I mean, imagine - which is not certain - that we eventually get a short-term fix for the debt crisis, whereby the fiscal compact (pdf) finally causes the ECB to buy sufficient bonds to reduce yields. (Nobody other than Lutheran masochists seriously thinks that fiscal restraint alone is sufficient). Even if we get this fix, the longer-term problem remains: how will southern European nations be able to grow, given that they are lumbered with both over-valued currencies and fiscal constraint?
    One possibility, and the reason why technocrats have taken charge of Greece and Italy, lies in supply-side reforms. Relaxing employment protection  and reforming public sectors might allow the private sector to grow.
    And it’s here that left and right attitudes are the wrong way round.
    A standard rightist answer here might be: “fiscal policy was always a weak tool anyway, and supply-side policies do raise growth, so maybe the euro can survive.” Leftists, by contrast, think the end of activist fiscal policy is a serious loss but are sceptical about supply-side policies, so they should be more pessimistic about the euro’s chances of survival.
    But this is not how things actually are. The noisiest forecasts of the euro’s failure come from the right, whilst the left are generally either silent or more confident of its survival. This is the mirror image of what one might expect. Why the difference?
    One possibility is that the right’s elasticity optimism causes it to believe that floating exchange rates are a good and powerful thing, whilst the left’s scepticism about the efficacy of free markets leads it to deny this and accept the feasibility of a single currency.  Another possibility - which I’m less sure about - is that the right has valued national sovereignty more highly than the left and so thought its loss more grievous.
    These factors might have been pretty much the limit of the British left and right attitudes to the euro for a long time. But they no longer are. I suspect, therefore, that the British left might - and should - therefore become increasingly sceptical about the viability of the euro in the long-run, even if it does survive in the short-term. Whether anyone gives a damn about the opinion of the British left on this issue is, though, another matter.

    • Original article
    • Login or register to post comments
     

    Related

    • Tax incidence: left responses

      Can social democratic policies reconcile capitalism with leftist conceptions of social justice? This is an old question which I ask because of a new paper which finds that, in Germany: a 1 euro increase in [corporate] tax liabilities yields a 77 cent decrease in the wage bill.

    • What Mario means when he talks about growth

      THE European Central Bank was playing away today, in Barcelona rather than Frankfurt, but the result would have been the same wherever its governing council met: a no-change score, with the main policy rate left at 1%.

    • Remember the supply-side?

      Pretty much all the economic debate is about monetary and fiscal policy, which are ways of manipulating (possibly weakly) aggregate demand, rather than aggregate supply.

    • Policy failure, no economic damage

      Sometimes, even abject policy failure does make much material difference. This is the paradox of the UK government's loss of its AAA credit rating. Economically speaking, this won't make much difference. As I wrote recently:

    • Euro shocks & fiscal policy

      There's something George Osborne said today that I want to argue with. It's this:

    • Italy Prime Minister Still in Power (Not for Long as Rats Jump Shift); Mish's Rule of Junkyard Politics

      Italy's Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi's days are numbered. He will likely be gone in a week. When it happens it will be a case of 2 down with Merkozy (France and Germany), Spain, and Portugal (thus 4) to go.

    • Left & right, state & power

      Charles Moore’s revelation - “the Left might actually be right” - raises a challenge for the left as well as the right.Take the challenge for the right first. Moore suggests that the Left might have been right to regard free markets as a “set up” in which “the rich run a global system that allows them to accumulate capital and pay the lowest possible price for labour.”

    • Hicks & Gillett: ownership in question

      The Hicks-Gillett saga shows that, despite the impression given by Jimmy Tarbuck and Stan Boardman, great comedy can come out of Merseyside. It also throws into question the standard view about the ownership of assets generally (I’d call it the neoliberal view if I were a pretentious git.)

    • Pfizer's Failure Provides Clarity for Arqule

      Ohad Hammer submits:Monday Pfizer (PFE) announced that Sutent failed to prolong survival of lung cancer patients when given in combination with Tarceva. The drug led to an increase in progression free survival (PFS), which was the secondary endpoint of the study.

    • Cameron's failure: the left's problem

      In one respect, the Left should be a little worried by the Conservatives’ failure.To see what I mean, consider John Kay’s claim that there’s an intellectual vacuum” on the Left:

    Latest

    80% Of Media Buyers Think Google UK Isn't Telling The Truth About Ads
    80% Of Media Buyers Think Google UK Isn't...
    Yahoo's Board Approves $1.1 Billion Purchase Of Tumblr (YHOO)
    Yahoo's Board Approves $1.1 Billion Purchase...

    User login

    • Create new account
    • Request new password
    • Click on the icon to sign in with your social network login or enter your Bullfax.com login

    Our Blog

    • Aviva steps up drive for cost cuts
    • Food Demand, JM Financial, UK Startups Incubator and Sina in Our News for Today 05/17/2013
    • Budget black hole at heart of George Osborne’s finances

    Markets Map

    Markets Map

    Follow Us

    Follow Us on Facebook, Twitter, Google Plus and RSS LinkedIn Facebook Twitter Google Plus RSS
    S&P 500: 1667.47 1.02% FTSE: 6723.06 0.52% Nikk.: 15138.12 0.67% DAX: 8398.00 0.33% HSI: 23082.68 0.17% FX: EUR/GBP: 1.1821 USD/EUR: 1.2833 JPY/USD: 103.165 Commodities: Gold: 1360.15

    Bullfax.com - Market News & Analysis 2008-2011
    Contact Us | About Us | Terms & Conditions

    Follow Us on Facebook, Twitter, Google Plus and RSS LinkedIn Facebook Twitter Google Plus RSS .

    Secondary menu

    • Latest News
    • Top Rated
    • Most Popular
    • Archive
    • Discussions