Jump to Navigation
Home

Main menu

  • Home
  • News
  • Markets Map
  • Sentiments
  • Topics
  • Data
  • Comments
  • Images
  • Blog
  • About

Secondary menu

  • Latest News
  • Top Rated
  • Most Popular
  • Archive
  • Discussions
  • Chesapeake Energy hires Anadarko executive as CEO: WSJ
  • Storms rip through Oklahoma
  • Chesapeake Energy hires Anadarko executive as CEO: WSJ
  • Execs questioned on Jackson's death
  • Roth & Company office closed Monday, May 20
  • Yahoo! to buy blog-maker Tumblr for $ 1.1 billion: report
  • High school prom held 50 years later
  • Yahoo! looks to Tumblr as elixir for revival
  • Lupin falls nearly 5% on Mylan drug launch, downgrade
  • 'No case for downgrading India's credit rating...

    Impact evaluation in trade: Time for a cultural revolution?

    Fri, 01/20/2012 - 20:00 EDT - Vox - EU
    • Comments

    Olivier Cadot, Ana M Fernandes, Julien Gourdon, Aaditya Mattoo, 21 January 2012With finances getter ever tighter in developed countries, policymakers are starting to ask whether giving money to developing countries can still be justified. Taking the example of Aid for Trade, billions have been spent with little robust evidence of its effectiveness. This column argues that trade policy needs to learn from other development work and start with rigorous impact evaluations – otherwise the best programmes could easily get cut. Full Article: Impact evaluation in trade: Time for a cultural revolution?

    • Original article
    • Login or register to post comments
     

    Related

    • New Research in Economics: Terrorism and the Macroeconomy: Evidence from Pakistan

      This is from Sultan Mehmood. The article appears in the May edition of Defense and Peace Economics, which the author describes as "a highly specialized journal on conflict":

    • Mr. Milos Rajsic, Business Development Director, Dynamic Communications Group, Serbia

                                                                                                          

    • The private sector: new seed-funders for development?

    • Aid for trade: Can it be evaluated?

      Olivier Cadot, Jaime de Melo, 14 April 2013Programmes that help developing nations trade are a key part of the global trade and development agenda. But do such policies work? This column summarises lessons from a recent workshop on the issue. One promising way forward is to use benchmarking from existing data sets to identify the aid’s effectiveness.Full Article: Aid for trade: Can it be evaluated?

    • Eurozone crisis and austerity take toll on aid to developing world

    • The transatlantic trade talks and economic policy research: Time to re-tool

      Simon J Evenett, Robert M. Stern, 21 March 2013The US and the EU have announced their intentions to launch trade talks – the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership. This column argues that this should not be thought of as a standard tariff-lowering deal with a few extras thrown in for good measure. Rather, we don’t really know what it will do because trade economists have failed to develop the necessary tools for understanding its impact.

    • Global trade in services: Fear, facts, and offshoring

      J. Bradford Jensen, 19 November 2012Should developed countries fear trade in services? Won’t high skilled jobs be lost to cheaper, developing country service workers? This column argues that trade in services represents a profitable opportunity as long as international trade in services is liberalised.

    • A deadly mix for aid effectiveness

      Anders Olofsgård, 13 October 2012The recent focus on impact evaluation within development economics has led to increased pressure on aid agencies to provide evidence from randomised controlled trials. This column argues this reinforces a political bias towards immediately verifiable and media-packaged results at the expense of more long-term and complex processes such as institutional development.Full Article: A deadly mix for aid effectiveness

    • The “L” Word: Is lobbying actually a sign of progress in developing countries?

      Conventional wisdom holds that bribery is the preferred means of influencing government policy in less developed countries, while lobbying is more common in developed countries. Perhaps due to this perceived compartmentalization of lobbying and bribery, very little is known about the relationship between lobbying and bribery, the extent and effectiveness of lobbying vs. bribery in less developed countries, and how this relationship changes as countries move up the development ladder.

    • 'Those of us who work on children’s issues are very depressed'

      By Dylan Matthews

    Latest

    Israel seeks interim peace deal, says Palestinians ‘still not psychologically ready for an agreement’
    Israel seeks interim peace deal, says...
    Here Are All The Billboard Music Awards Winners
    Here Are All The Billboard Music Awards Winners

    User login

    • Create new account
    • Request new password
    • Click on the icon to sign in with your social network login or enter your Bullfax.com login

    Our Blog

    • Aviva steps up drive for cost cuts
    • Food Demand, JM Financial, UK Startups Incubator and Sina in Our News for Today 05/17/2013
    • Budget black hole at heart of George Osborne’s finances

    Markets Map

    Markets Map

    Follow Us

    Follow Us on Facebook, Twitter, Google Plus and RSS LinkedIn Facebook Twitter Google Plus RSS
    S&P 500: 1667.47 1.02% FTSE: 6723.06 0.52% Nikk.: 15360.81 1.45% DAX: 8398.00 0.33% HSI: 23477.891 1.68% FX: EUR/GBP: 1.1827 USD/EUR: 1.2846 JPY/USD: 102.645 Commodities: Gold: 1345.50

    Bullfax.com - Market News & Analysis 2008-2011
    Contact Us | About Us | Terms & Conditions

    Follow Us on Facebook, Twitter, Google Plus and RSS LinkedIn Facebook Twitter Google Plus RSS .

    Secondary menu

    • Latest News
    • Top Rated
    • Most Popular
    • Archive
    • Discussions