Jump to Navigation
Home

Main menu

  • Home
  • Latest Stories
  • Markets Map
  • Trends and Sentiments
  • Leading Topics
  • News Search
  • Comments and Analysis

Secondary menu

  • Latest News
  • Top Rated
  • Most Popular
  • Archive
  • About Us
  • Pennsylvania, Ohio, and West Virginia want to make...
  • Alphabet reports its Q1 earnings after the bell
  • Silicon Valley’s Hipper Baseball Team Keeps It Real By...
  • Links
  • Price Level Targeting with Evolving Credibility
  • What Will Change In Cuba After Castro?
  • Southwest cancels more U.S. flights as it inspects engines
  • Wall Street edges lower as tech stocks, bond yields weigh
  • LIVE: Here come Alphabet's Q1 earnings (GOOG, GOOGL)
  • Details of the Trump-Macron state dinner revealed

    Hypocrisy Bonanza As Senate Republicans Mount Filibuster of Goodwin Liu They Previously Deemed Unconstitutional

    Thu, 05/19/2011 - 15:50 EDT - Mathew Yglesias
    • Comments
    • Political Reform
    • uncat


    Goodwin Liu’s nomination to serve on the 9th Circuit came up for a vote today and Senate Republicans filibustered it to death. Ian Milhiser notes that many of those who voted to block an up-or-down vote on Liu until recently viewed the filibustering of judicial nominees to be categorically evil:
    — Lamar Alexander (R-TN): “I would never filibuster any President’s judicial nominee, period. I might vote against them, but I will always see they came to a vote.”
    — Saxby Chambliss (R-GA) and Johnny Isakson (R-GA): “Every judge nominated by this president or any president deserves an up-or-down vote. It’s the responsibility of the Senate. The Constitution requires it.”
    — Tom Coburn (R-OK): “If you look at the Constitution, it says the president is to nominate these people, and the Senate is to advise and consent. That means you got to have a vote if they come out of committee. And that happened for 200 years.”
    — John Cornyn (R-TX): “We have a Democratic leader defeated, in part, as I said, because I believe he was identified with this obstructionist practice, this unconstitutional use of the filibuster to deny the president his judicial nominations.
    — Mike Crapo (R-ID): “Until this Congress, not one of the President’s nominees has been successfully filibustered in the Senate of the United States because of the understanding of the fact that the Constitution gives the President the right to a vote.”
    — Chuck Grassley (R-IA): “It would be a real constitutional crisis if we up the confirmation of judges from 51 to 60, and that’s essentially what we’d be doing if the Democrats were going to filibuster.”
    — Mitch McConnell (R-KY): “The Constitution of the United States is at stake. Article II, Section 2 clearly provides that the President, and the President alone, nominates judges. The Senate is empowered to give advice and consent. But my Democratic colleagues want to change the rules. They want to reinterpret the Constitution to require a supermajority for confirmation.”
    As I wrote at the time the correct progressive response to the “nuclear option”/filibuster controversy of 2005 would have been to seize the opportunity to eliminate or phase-out the filibuster. Had that happened, a few more right-wing judges would be on the bench today but much more progressive legislation could have passed in the 111th Congress and those extra conservative jurists would be counter-balanced by first-rate progressive jurists like Goodwin Liu.


    • Original article
    • Login to post comments
     

    Related

    • The first shots were just fired in the Senate's brewing judiciary war

      Win McNamee/Getty Images

    • The Senate Is Careening Toward Another 'Nuclear Option' Confrontation

      Did you think that, in the aftermath of the government shutdown and debt-ceiling standoff, things were getting less confrontational in Congress?

    • A Democratic filibuster is underway to prevent Neil Gorsuch's confirmation to the Supreme Court

      REUTERS/Joshua RobertsWASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. Senate moved on Tuesday toward ramming through approval of President Donald Trump's Supreme Court nominee this week, as its top Republican said he had the votes to wipe away Democratic roadblocks but vowed to preserve the minority party's ability to hold up legislation.

    • The Senate is careening toward a 'nuclear' fight

      Chip Somodevilla/Getty ImagesJudge Neil Gorsuch's nomination faces a key test this week that could put him on the bench or, in an unlikely scenario, force President Donald Trump to withdraw the judge's nomination.

    • Top Democrat: Republicans invoked the 'nuclear' option with Obama's Supreme Court nominee — 'the rest is fallout'

      The political wrangling over President Donald Trump's choice for the US Supreme Court has set up what could turn out to be an unprecedented battle in the Senate. Democrats on Monday were poised to block Judge Neil Gorsuch, depriving him of the 60-vote threshold needed to avoid a filibuster.

    • Influential conservative groups are pressuring McConnell to start moving faster on Trump's judicial nominations

      Chip Somodevilla/Getty ImagesSenate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell has had to stave off fights with influential outside conservative groups that are frustrated with the Senate's slow pace of confirmation for President Donald Trump's judicial nominations, Politico reported Monday.

    • Senate looks set to confirm Neil Gorsuch to the Supreme Court

      Thomson Reuters

    • The Senate just cleared the first hurdle in confirming Neil Gorsuch to the Supreme Court

      WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Democrats on Monday amassed enough support to block a US Senate confirmation vote on President Donald Trump's Supreme Court nominee, Neil Gorsuch, but Republicans vowed to change the Senate rules to ensure the conservative judge gets the lifetime job.

    • Neil Gorsuch Set To Take The Stand For 3 Days Of Senate Grilling; Here's What To Watch For

      Later this morning at 11AM EST, Neil Gorsuch will take the stand before the Senate Judiciary Committee for three full, fun-packed days of grueling testimony that will no doubt come complete with several outbursts from disaffected liberal protesters and faux outrage from Democratic committee members.  According to Judiciary Chair Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa), the panel will hear opening statements from committee members and Gorsuch on Monday, then begin questioning him on Tuesday.

    • Obama Wants To Change The Face Of The Federal Judiciary, If His Nominees Can Make It Through The Senate

      WASHINGTON (AP) — President Barack Obama is trying to change the face of a federal judiciary that has a long tradition of white men passing judgment on parties from all walks of life — if he can get his nominees past the Senate.

    Latest

    What you need to know in advertising today
    LIVE: Here come Alphabet's Q1 earnings (GOOG...
    Trump Instructs DHS To Block "Caravans" Of Illegals After First Wave Reaches Border
    Trump Instructs DHS To Block "Caravans...

    Markets Map

    Markets Map

    Follow Us

    Follow Us on Facebook, Twitter, Google Plus and RSS LinkedIn Facebook Twitter Google Plus RSS
    S&P 500: 2579.37 0.16% FTSE: 7487.96 -0.07% Nikk.: 22420.08 1.82% DAX: 13465.51 1.75% HSI: 28594.06 1.22% FX: EUR/GBP: 1.1401 USD/EUR: 1.1618 JPY/USD: 114.1510 Commodities: Gold: 1276.1000

    Bullfax.com - Market News & Analysis 2008-2011
    Contact Us | About Us | Terms & Conditions

    Follow Us on Facebook, Twitter, Google Plus and RSS LinkedIn Facebook Twitter Google Plus RSS .

    Secondary menu

    • Latest News
    • Top Rated
    • Most Popular
    • Archive
    • About Us