Jump to Navigation
Home

Main menu

  • Home
  • News
  • Markets Map
  • Sentiments
  • Topics
  • Data
  • Comments
  • Images
  • Blog
  • About

Secondary menu

  • Latest News
  • Top Rated
  • Most Popular
  • Archive
  • Discussions
  • ‘Garbage is money’: Ford wants to use ‘some sort of...
  • China's Central Bank Maintains Tough Stance Amid...
  • 2 charged in X-ray terror plot
  • Austin NBC Affiliate Cut To Promos 3 Seconds Before Game-...
  • GameStop Gets Bid As Microsoft Backtracks On DRM
  • Britain, France face EU action over high Eurostar charges
  • China factory activity slows further
  • Rupee slumps to a record low, inches closer to 60/$
  • Outside the Box: Japan becoming the land of the setting...
  • The Expert View: BT, Aggreko and Spirit Pub Co

    Energy, Inflation, and Recession

    Tue, 05/03/2011 - 15:06 EDT - Mathew Yglesias
    • Comments
    • energy
    • monetary policy
    • uncat

    Kevin Drum notes some historical data indicating that before 1970, there was no relationship between energy price spikes and inflation but since 1970 the one is always followed by the other:

    This can be interpreted in a bunch of ways, but let me ask myself what would Scott Sumner say. An energy price shock tends to push the price level up but real GDP down. Consequently, the impact on overall nominal spending is ambiguous. If the central bank looks exclusively at the price level, it’ll respond to this shock by squeezing nominal spending which pushes real output lower than the shock alone would. If instead the bank was able to credibly keep nominal spending on an even path then growth would still slow but the crash wouldn’t be nearly as sharp and actual contractions in output could be typically avoided. You’d get a rise in unemployment in specifically energy-intensive industries but there’d be no reason to expect a general increase in idleness.
    For an example of how this can go wrong, check out the European Central Bank raising interest rates to counter high oil prices. Even a relatively large slowdown in Eurozone economic activity is going to have only a marginal impact on the global price of oil, so to bring headline inflation to their target they’ll need all kinds of deflation in the non-energy sector.


    • Original article
    • Login or register to post comments
     

    Related

    • Shale oil could boost global GDP by $2.7T a year: PwC

      Worldwide shale oil production could add $2.7-trillion to the global economy annually by 2035 by slashing the price of crude by as much as $50 a barrel, PwC said on Thursday. Shale oil production could surge to 14 million barrels per day, or as much as 12 percent of total oil output from around 1 percent now, as it expands from its U.S. base over the next two decades, the world’s largest accounting firm said in a report.

    • What to expect when you're expecting faster growth

      EARLY this week, my colleague questioned the wisdom of encouraging central banks to raise inflation expectations. Having written (once or twice) on why doing so is in fact a good idea, I thought I'd respond to a few points.

    • Inflation up. Growth down. Uncertainty everywhere

      You don't go to Inflation Report press conferences nowadays to get cheered up. The "news", if we can call it that, is that the Bank's Monetary Policy Committee (MPC) now thinks inflation will be significantly higher than they previously thought, not just in 2011 but in 2012. Indeed, if reality - by some freakish accident - follows the path suggested by the new forecast, the target measure of inflation will still be within shouting distance of 3% a year from now.

    • The NY Fed’s View of Interest on Reserves

      Reader RG sent me a link to a year-old paper from the New York Fed (PDF) which pretty clearly lays out the policy rationale for paying interest on excess bank reserves, and in the course of doing so helps explain why it’s a mistake:

    • Bank of England expected to lower UK GDP growth forecasts

    • Japan Manufacturing PMI Downturn Accelerates; Output and New Orders Suffer Sharpest Contractions for 20 Months; Cheaper Yen Cannot Save Japan

      The Markit/JMMA Japan Manufacturing PMI™ shows Downturn of manufacturing sector accelerated during December. Key points: Output and new orders register sharpest contractions for 20 months Employment, purchasing and stocks all continue to be cut Output charges lowered further as input prices remain unchanged

    • Eurozone Downturn Deepens, PMI at 40-Month Low; Manufacturing Weakness in Germany; Considerable Service and Manufacturing Contraction in France

      This morning Markit released Eurozone, France, and Germany preliminary PMI reports. All show further deterioration. Germany Markit Flash Germany PMI® shows Manufacturing weakness behind moderate drop in German private sector output during October. Summary

    • Some Thoughts on Energy Independence

      The President's new initiative on increasing energy independence inspired much commentary on how much it was aspirational, rather than realistic; see for instance this extensive NYT article. In this post, I want to consider whether reduced dependence on imported energy is a worthwhile objective. Oil Price Shocks: How Important in the Past? What are the macroeconomic consequences of oil shocks.

    • Stabilising spending

      SCOTT SUMNER has been a frequent subject of this blog over the past year or so. Mr Sumner, an economist at Bentley University, came to prominence during the recession and recovery for observing that the Fed was doing far too little to support the economy, and (perhaps more important) that it had helped precipitate the deep recession by doing too little in 2008, during which time nominal GDP was falling sharply.

    • Good News and Bad News from the GDP release

      Some additional observations (see Jim Hamilton's take, as well as others) on the GDP release: (1) the five year revision indicates that GDP was larger than we thought, but it also declined faster in 2009Q1; (2) GDP growth was lower throughout 2008 than earlier estimated; (3) GDP growth in 2008Q2 at 1.5% SAAR would have likely been at zero or negative in the absence of the January 2008 stimulus package in which

    Latest

    China's Central Bank Maintains Tough Stance Amid Liquidity Crunch
    China's Central Bank Maintains Tough Stance...
    The Top Ten Stocks for June 19
    The Top Ten Stocks for June 19

    User login

    • Create new account
    • Request new password
    • Click on the icon to sign in with your social network login or enter your Bullfax.com login

    Our Blog

    • Oil Prices, India’s Inflation, Panama Canal and Bank Lending in Our News for Today 06/14/2013
    • SoftBank: Sprint to the finish
    • Royal Bank of Scotland, World Bank, European Stocks and Apple in Our Daily Round-Up for 06/13/2013

    Markets Map

    Markets Map

    Follow Us

    Follow Us on Facebook, Twitter, Google Plus and RSS LinkedIn Facebook Twitter Google Plus RSS
    S&P 500: 1628.93 -1.4% FTSE: 6348.82 -0.4% Nikk.: 13127.8 -0.89% DAX: 8197.08 -0.4% HSI: 20458.17 -2.58% FX: EUR/GBP: 1.1649 USD/EUR: 1.3259 JPY/USD: 97.005 Commodities: Gold: 1347.50

    Bullfax.com - Market News & Analysis 2008-2011
    Contact Us | About Us | Terms & Conditions

    Follow Us on Facebook, Twitter, Google Plus and RSS LinkedIn Facebook Twitter Google Plus RSS .

    Secondary menu

    • Latest News
    • Top Rated
    • Most Popular
    • Archive
    • Discussions