Jump to Navigation
Home

Main menu

  • Home
  • Latest Stories
  • Markets Map
  • Trends and Sentiments
  • Leading Topics
  • News Search
  • Comments and Analysis

Secondary menu

  • Latest News
  • Top Rated
  • Most Popular
  • Archive
  • About Us
  • Where countries are tinderboxes and Facebook is a match
  • Suicide blast hits Afghan voter registration center,...
  • Finance Minister says Saudi Arabia is investing in...
  • Do oil rises point to a tipping point for yields?
  • Crossed wires in battle for European telecoms
  • The eurozone economy: a nasty surprise in store?
  • Austin Powers movies' Mini-Me, Verne Troyer, dies
  • Jamie Margolin: You've failed your children on...
  • Do oil rises point to a tipping point for bond yields?
  • UK set to force companies to reveal pay ratios

    Did Anyone Predict The Economic Bust AND The Boom?

    Mon, 06/10/2013 - 04:36 EDT - Business Insider
    • RDF10

    There’s been a big brouhaha in recent weeks over who actually predicted the financial crisis and whether it matters.  I think maybe we’re asking the wrong question though.  The reason is simple – we’re being biased towards one narrow part of the business cycle. One thing you’ll find among those who claim to have predicted the crisis is that a lot of them are perennial bears.  I often cite Wynne Godley for predicting the financial crisis in the USA and the Euro crisis, but Godley was famously bearish throughout his life.  And that tends to be the case with many of the economists who “predicted” the crisis.  You find that many of them were bearish for years or even decades before the crisis and then when the storm hit they were lauded for their forecasting capabilities.  A classic case is someone like Peter Schiff who seems to always be negative about something in the USA so when something finally goes wrong he tends to have his hands in some part of the “forecasted” disaster.  It’s the old “stopped clock” thing… Now, I should add that the main reason I love Godley’s predictions is because he clearly explained WHY the crisis would occur.  That is, he understood, at an operational level, why something was wrong with the US economy and the Euro system.  He wasn’t just screaming fire in a crowded theater for 20 years straight.  He was explaining precisely why there was a high risk of fire in the first place and showing us precisely why the theater was so dangerous.  Most of the predictors of the crisis were just towing the party line or saying the same thing they’d been saying for a long time (like, debt is unstable, government is bad, the Fed is a ponzi scheme, etc).  But maybe we focus on one part of the business cycle too much.  After all, a great trader doesn’t make money just because he makes a great prediction in one direction.  He must also be smart enough to know when the odds have changed and now favor cashing out.  So maybe the better question is, who predicted the crisis AND the ensuing recovery?  In other words, who predicted the entire cycle instead of just the part that gets all the media attention?  Isn’t that a better display of real skill in forecasting? So the more important question here might not be who predicted the bust, but who ALSO predicted the boom afterwards?  Okay, “boom” might be a bit of an overstatement, but there’s certainly been at least some recovery.  There’s definitely been a huge recovery in most assets, but I know we can debate the strength of the recovery.  Anyhow, is there anyone who was extremely bearish heading into the downturn who was also prescient enough to predict that the world wasn’t ending and that we might actually be on the verge of a big turnaround when things looked so terrible in 2009/10? Honestly, I can’t think of anyone off the top of my head who did this so I wanted to throw it out there to you guys.  Did anyone predict the bust AND the boom? Please follow Money Game on Twitter and Facebook.Join the conversation about this story »    

    • Original article
    • Login to post comments
     

    Related

    • Did Anyone Predict The Bust AND The Boom?

      By Cullen Roche: There’s been a big brouhaha in recent weeks over who actually predicted the financial crisis and whether it matters. I think maybe we’re asking the wrong question though. The reason is simple – we’re being biased towards one narrow part of the business cycle.

    • In Defense Of Peter Schiff

      Submitted by James E. Miller via Mises Canada,

    • Richard Alford: Has the Fed Learned Monetary Policy Lessons from the Financial Crisis?

      Yves here. This post is a devastating critique of current Fed policy. But Alford sets his stage carefully before delivering his conclusions, so don’t be deceived by the tone of the early sections. By Richard Alford, a former New York Fed economist. Since then, he has worked in the financial industry as a trading floor economist and strategist on both the sell side and the buy side

    • Despite High-Tech Sensors, Here's Why F-35 Pilots Need To Visually Check Behind Them

      In a recent post, we explained that a recently leaked Pentagon report highlighted the poor “out-of-cockpit visibility in the F-35A”, a shortcoming that would limit the pilots ability to see aerial threats surrounding the plane, putting the costly 

    • Guest Post: Playing Financial Chicken In Your Golden Years

      Via Monty Pelerin's World blog, My generation, born during or near post World War II, has been quite fortunate. Those of us lucky to have been born in the US during this period hit a sweet spot of both place and history. The economy thrived, standards of living soared and many avoided the numerous wars that dominated the Twentieth Century.

    • Brazil's economy has been blasted back to the financial crisis

      Economic indicators are flashing danger in Brazil.

    • 'Why Are Economic Forecasts Wrong So Often?'

      At MoneyWatch:

    • Why Listening to Economists Is Dangerous for Your Health

      According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, consumer prices are rising at a 2.1% annual rate. This suggests to us that the current stock market boom will die with a bang, rather than a whimper. Fed economists say they don’t think inflation rates are rising. They think the most recent reading is a fluke. But why does anyone take them seriously? Prakash Loungani, an economist working for the IMF, undertook a study, not so much to find out as to gawk and laugh. It was published in 2001 in the International Journal of Forecasting.

    • Richard Alford: Not Only Are Economists in Policy Roles Bad at Forecasting, They Also Do a Poor Job of Allowing for Error

      Yves here. This post indirectly makes a powerful case for automatic stabilizers, as in programs like food stamps and other social safety nets, where spending automatically rises in bad times and falls off when the economy is robust. You don’t need economists intervening as much if government spending levels auto-correct.

    Latest

    The UK Treasury's Robert Jenrick talks to Business Insider about inequality, productivity, and whether he'd rather fight 100 duck-sized horses or one horse-sized duck
    The UK Treasury's Robert Jenrick talks to...
    Theresa May is preparing to surrender over plans to leave the Customs Union after Brexit
    Theresa May is preparing to surrender over plans...

    Markets Map

    Markets Map

    Follow Us

    Follow Us on Facebook, Twitter, Google Plus and RSS LinkedIn Facebook Twitter Google Plus RSS
    S&P 500: 2579.37 0.16% FTSE: 7487.96 -0.07% Nikk.: 22420.08 1.82% DAX: 13465.51 1.75% HSI: 28594.06 1.22% FX: EUR/GBP: 1.1401 USD/EUR: 1.1618 JPY/USD: 114.1510 Commodities: Gold: 1276.1000

    Bullfax.com - Market News & Analysis 2008-2011
    Contact Us | About Us | Terms & Conditions

    Follow Us on Facebook, Twitter, Google Plus and RSS LinkedIn Facebook Twitter Google Plus RSS .

    Secondary menu

    • Latest News
    • Top Rated
    • Most Popular
    • Archive
    • About Us