While protests over pay might make corporate governance activists happier to think they are a sign of change, they are more likely to dissipate once the media attention surrounding them dies down.
MONTREAL – Every spring, a bespectacled little man with a silver moustache and a penchant for theatrics takes the microphone at select annual shareholder meetings in Canada and gives directors and management a multi-minute tongue-lashing about every corporate governance flaw he’s identified at their company.
It’s the gospel according to Yves Michaud.
In recent matters involving struggling banks, the Federal Reserve has sought to limit the ability of shareholder activists to nominate directors, which some investors view as an instrument of good corporate governance.