Jump to Navigation
Home

Main menu

  • Home
  • News
  • Markets Map
  • Sentiments
  • Topics
  • Data
  • Comments
  • Images
  • Blog
  • About

Secondary menu

  • Latest News
  • Top Rated
  • Most Popular
  • Archive
  • Discussions
  • Board at J.P. Morgan Faces Shake-Up
  • iGate fires CEO Phaneesh Murthy on sexual misconduct...
  • Tip Puts Lobbyist's Career on Hold
  • Asian shares retreat from five-year high
  • Role of watchdog
  • Iron fist on listed firms heartens investors
  • Zoom Technologies' Management Discusses Q1 2013...
  • Tuesday Papers: Apple accused of avoiding billions in...
  • Economic transformation bears fruit in Guizhou
  • Why Your Facebook Account is More Secure Than Your Bank...

    DC Should Aim to Grow, Rather Then Shrink, as a Share of the DC Area

    Sat, 11/13/2010 - 09:31 EDT - Mathew Yglesias
    • Comments
    • DC
    • uncat

    Via Eric Weber the latest growth forecasts for the Washington DC area foresee strong growth in both population and employment in both the city and the surrounding area:

    I don’t think DC residents should reconcile ourselves to accepting the idea that our city will grow slower than the metropolitan area as a whole. If we allowed for the construction of taller office buildings downtown, more employment than this would located in the District. This would allow for lower tax rates and better city services, both of which would make the city a more attractive place to live. Combine that with the fact that proximity to employment is a factor people consider when choosing where to live, and we could see much stronger population growth.
    That would mean shorter commutes, less sprawl, a more efficient regional economy, and less pollution.
    Much the same, I might add, applies to the inner suburbs of Arlington, Montgomery, Prince George’s, and Fairfax Counties all of which are projected to see slower-than-DC population growth. These territories contain many more people and occupy much more space than DC itself. And they’re nice places to live. But land use regulation tends to prevent them from becoming denser, and pushes people ever-further out onto the fringe.


    • Original article
    • Login or register to post comments
     

    Related

    • Rezoning Montgomery County

      The low-density spot between the Friendship Heights and Bethesda density-pockets would probably get denser if it were legal. (Google Maps)

    • The High Price of Short Buildings

      (cc photo by cbowns)

    • Taller Buildings Would Improve The Efficacy Of Regional Mass Transit Systems

      Dana Hedgpeth writes up new research comparing metropolitan areas by the efficacy of their transit systems in getting people to work:

    • Land Use and Real Estate Bubbles

    • Taller Buildings

      Roger Lewis makes the case in The Washington Post for taller buildings in DC. I agree with what he says, though I think he’s far too ginger about calling for taller buildings in the existing central business district. Most people seem to think the downtown height limit has something to do with the Capitol Dome. So what if we replaced the current 130 foot limit with something closer to the actual 288 foot Capitol building? Say we let people go up to 260 feet?

    • Triumph of the City

      I reviewed Ed Glaeser’s Triumph of the City: How Our Greatest Invention Makes Us Richer, Smarter, Greener, Healthier, and Happier for the Washington Monthly. It’s a very good book and it does a lot to move our national understanding of these issues forward.

    • More Sprawl Commentary

      Kevin Drum chimed into the sprawl debate with a contribution that I think is a little confused: I’m just saying that everyone needs to understand what they’re up against here. It’s not zoning per se that causes sprawl, it’s the fact that lots of registered voters actively want sprawl and have successfully demanded rules that keep density at bay. These kinds of land use regulations aren’t going away without the mother of all knock-down-drag-out fights first.

    • Taxing Our Way To Shorter Commutes

      KW writes:

    • The High Fiscal Cost of Short Buildings

      (cc photo by cbowns)

    • DC Population Growth

      Another factoid from the recently released population estimates is that after decades of decline, Washington DC has posted a strong decade of population growth and is now just a tiny bit shy of the 600,000 mark—basically where it was twenty years ago:

    Latest

    Why Your Facebook Account is More Secure Than Your Bank Account
    Why Your Facebook Account is More Secure Than...
    The Rise And Fall Of JP Morgan's Jamie Dimon, America's Most Powerful Banker
    The Rise And Fall Of JP Morgan's Jamie Dimon...

    User login

    • Create new account
    • Request new password
    • Click on the icon to sign in with your social network login or enter your Bullfax.com login

    Our Blog

    • Quantative Easing: Not on the long run
    • China’s Insurers, PC Shipments, Bird flu Consequences and French taxes in Our Daily Round-Up for 05/20/2013
    • Yahoo buys start-up Tumblr for $1bn

    Markets Map

    Markets Map

    Follow Us

    Follow Us on Facebook, Twitter, Google Plus and RSS LinkedIn Facebook Twitter Google Plus RSS
    S&P 500: 1666.29 -0.07% FTSE: 6755.63 1% Nikk.: 15321.03 -0.26% DAX: 8455.83 0.68% HSI: 23393.141 -0.43% FX: EUR/GBP: 1.1833 USD/EUR: 1.2889 JPY/USD: 102.525 Commodities: Gold: 1391.65

    Bullfax.com - Market News & Analysis 2008-2011
    Contact Us | About Us | Terms & Conditions

    Follow Us on Facebook, Twitter, Google Plus and RSS LinkedIn Facebook Twitter Google Plus RSS .

    Secondary menu

    • Latest News
    • Top Rated
    • Most Popular
    • Archive
    • Discussions