Jump to Navigation
Home

Main menu

  • Home
  • Latest Stories
  • Markets Map
  • Trends and Sentiments
  • Leading Topics
  • News Search
  • Comments and Analysis

Secondary menu

  • Latest News
  • Top Rated
  • Most Popular
  • Archive
  • About Us
  • DOJ Inspector General Refers McCabe For Criminal Charges
  • Spain Italy fact of the day
  • Analysis: Israel’s first 70 years have surprised the world
  • YouTube ran ads from hundreds of brands on extremist...
  • Small Changes Lead To Big Improvement For Miami Dolphins...
  • How To Feel Like You Have A Steady Paycheck Even If You...
  • Oil Prices Are Going Up... And So Is Your Gasoline Bill
  • Electric Vehicles Are Sparking Demand For Ethically-...
  • Why ATM's In Modi's India Are Running Out Of...
  • Amid the big energy rally, here’s why Schlumberger may be...

    Data on Tax Rates, by Quintiles

    Thu, 07/12/2012 - 16:00 EDT - EconBrowser
    • Comments
    • taxes

    Or, where have you gone, Todd Henderson?
    About two years ago, law school professor Todd Henderson complained about the difficulties of making ends meet on slightly more than $250,000, as a way of arguing against the proposal to allow the Bush tax cuts expire for incomes above $250,000, since he was not "rich" in his own estimation. Given the CBO’s release of the actual (data based) estimates of tax rates [1], I thought it useful to revisit the debate over the plight of the top 1%. Professor Henderson took down the blog post soon after posting, and most repostings have been expunged from the Web, but fortunately one can find a repost of this gem here. The key quote:
    ... Our combined income exceeds the $250,000 threshold for the super rich (but not by that much), and the president plans on raising my taxes. After all, we can afford it, and the world we are now living in has that familiar Marxian tone of those who need take and those who can afford it pay. The problem is, we can’t afford it. Here is why.

    Interested readers can read the entire story of the Professor’s plight here.

    The graphs based on the CBO data are quite striking, and are at variance with the beliefs held in the fevered imagination of some commentators that taxes have risen enormously under the current Administration.

    toddhenderson1.gif

    Figure 1: Average Federal tax rates, by pre-tax income quintiles. Figures in parentheses are the incomes at the bottom of the respective quintiles for 4 person households. Source: CBO, The Distribution of Household Income and Federal Taxes, 2008 and 2009, supplementary Excel file.

    Note that the highest quintile bottom income is $148.1K, substantially below the Todd Henderson figure (either self-reported or estimated by others). The following graph shows that the Todd Henderson household is probably at the bottom of the 96-99th percentile.

    toddhenderson2.gif

    Figure 2: Average Federal tax rates, by pre-tax income quintiles. Figures in parentheses are the incomes at the bottom of the respective quintiles for 4 person households. Source: CBO, The Distribution of Household Income and Federal Taxes, 2008 and 2009, supplementary Excel file.

    One last observation: I know that there will be the usual talk about the onerous burden placed on the “job creators” (a euphemism applied indiscriminately to those households with high incomes) deterring growth, should Federal tax rates rise to those prevailing during the Clinton Administration (during which time per capita income growth exceeded that during the EGTRRA/JGTRRA era). However, there is no obvious correlation between the tax rate applying to the top quintile and per capita GDP growth.

    toddhenderson3.gif

    Figure 3: Scatterplot of per capita GDP growth (Ch.2005$) against tax rate on top fifth quintile, 1979-2009. Nearest neighbor fit, tricube local weighting, bandwidth = 0.7. Source: BEA, CBO, and author’s calculations.

    For those interested, linear regression yields a slope coefficient of 0.35, significant at the 20% msl. Over the time period of the EGTRRA/JGTRRA experiment (2001-09), the slope coefficient is 1.32, significant at the 6% msl. This is not proof that higher tax rates cause faster growth (since one can’t impute causality without additional structure), but it surely puts the burden of proof on those who assert strong negative effects arising from higher tax rates.

    For more discussion of tax rates and elasticities, see [2], [3], [4], [5].

    • Original article
    • Login to post comments
     

    Related

    • Growth of income and welfare in the U.S, 1979-2011

      This new NBER paper by John Komlos is of real interest, and it documents the “average is over” idea of the dwindling of middle class fortunes:

    • The 5 Biggest Myths About Income Inequality

      “Inequality is the defining challenge of our time,” according to President Obama. It’s certainly the topic of the day for Paul Krugman, Joe Stiglitz and a whole raft of liberal pundits. But have you noticed that hardly anyone else is talking about it? When is the last time you heard a shoeshine person or a taxi cab driver complain about inequality? For most people, having a lot of rich people around is good for business. But if average folks are not complaining should they be?

    • The Distribution of the U.S. Mortgage Interest Tax Deduction by Income

      If the federal government tries to increase the amount of its tax collections by eliminating or limiting the mortgage interest tax deduction, who's most at risk of seeing their taxes go up? To find out, we tapped the U.S. Congress' Joint Committee on Taxation's report on tax expenditures for 2010-2014, which provides the breakdown of how much of the mortage interest tax deduction is claimed by taxpayer income level for the 2009 tax year.

    • What Disposable Income Looks Like: With And Without Government Handouts

      While it is now undisputed by even the Federal Reserve itself, that all the "benefits" of QE have accrued exclusively to the wealthiest segment of society, those 0.01% whose wealth is mostly invested in financial assets which have inflated in direct proportion with the Fed's balance sheet, some have tried to suggest that because the disposable income of the average American has also increased in the past few years, then QE has been a success. There is one problem with that statement: it isn't true.

    • Can We Do the Non-Crazy Thing with the Bush Tax Cuts?

    • Research desk compares: Who gets hit hardest if the Bush tax cuts expire?

      By Dylan Matthews michaelh81 asks:

    • Research desk: How much do the Bush tax cuts help small businesses?

      By Dylan Matthews Ross Cohen asks:

    • Strange Response to the CBO Outlook from the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget

      As previously noted, according to the Congressional Budget Office, if congress sticks by current law the fiscal situation is more-or-less okay for the next 20-25 years. It’s also true that according to the CBO and most everyone you meet, Congress seems unlikely to do that. So the message here should be: “Congress! Don’t live up to your bad reputation!

    • Research desk responds: Tax rates galore!

      By Dylan Matthews theorajones1 asks: What has happened to tax rates on median income people since 1980? Compared to everyone else? Can you do federal, state, and local? Luckily, the CBO has records (PDF) of effective federal tax rates, broken down by income quintile, going back to 1979:

    Latest

    DOJ Inspector General Refers McCabe For Criminal Charges
    DOJ Inspector General Refers McCabe For Criminal...
    Swiss campsites are the most expensive in Europe
    Swiss campsites are the most expensive in Europe

    Markets Map

    Markets Map

    Follow Us

    Follow Us on Facebook, Twitter, Google Plus and RSS LinkedIn Facebook Twitter Google Plus RSS
    S&P 500: 2579.37 0.16% FTSE: 7487.96 -0.07% Nikk.: 22420.08 1.82% DAX: 13465.51 1.75% HSI: 28594.06 1.22% FX: EUR/GBP: 1.1401 USD/EUR: 1.1618 JPY/USD: 114.1510 Commodities: Gold: 1276.1000

    Bullfax.com - Market News & Analysis 2008-2011
    Contact Us | About Us | Terms & Conditions

    Follow Us on Facebook, Twitter, Google Plus and RSS LinkedIn Facebook Twitter Google Plus RSS .

    Secondary menu

    • Latest News
    • Top Rated
    • Most Popular
    • Archive
    • About Us