Jump to Navigation
Home

Main menu

  • Home
  • News
  • Markets Map
  • Sentiments
  • Topics
  • Data
  • Comments
  • Images
  • Blog
  • About

Secondary menu

  • Latest News
  • Top Rated
  • Most Popular
  • Archive
  • Discussions
  • ‘You can’t profit from criminal activity’: Bid to buy...
  • Ignore Fed Hawks, Bernanke in Driving Seat
  • Shares the pros are buying and selling
  • SoftBank would appoint "security director" to...
  • High costs, currency push Ford out of Australia car...
  • Mitsubishi Motors weighs capital shift, dividends: sources
  • Average U.S. 401(k) balance tops $80,000, up 75 percent...
  • JGB yields surge, markets spooked by Bernanke remarks
  • Workday's CEO Discusses F1Q 2014 Results - Earnings...
  • SeaWorld's CEO Discusses Q1 2013 Results - Earnings...

    Corporate Political Contributions as Tax Break

    Wed, 03/24/2010 - 17:28 EDT - Mathew Yglesias
    • Campaign Finance
    • Comments
    • taxes
    • uncat

    cash-wad 1
    Erica Greider’s writeup of the first post-Citizens United dive into the world of campaign spending illustrates to me an angle I hadn’t seen before:
    Meanwhile, the Texas Tribune reports that it found a corporate-funded ad in a couple of small east Texas papers—the first corporate ad in Texas. There’s no attempt to hide the funding source—the ad takes the form of a letter signed, “Sincerely, KDR Development, inc.” But interestingly, the buy in this case seems to have been a personal affair. The president of KDR Development, which bought the ad, had previously run against the incumbent state representative and lost. Also, he thinks the incumbent (a recent D-to-R switcheroo) isn’t conservative enough for small business. So why pay for the ad through his company rather than through himself, the Trib asked? “You take the money out of the pocket that’s got some money in there,” he said.
    If nothing else, this suggests that Citizens United is going to be a significant tax break for politically active smallish business owners. If you used to be a guy who shelled out $10,000 a year on political contributions, then you used to need to pay yourself substantially more than that in nominal salary, then pay taxes on the money, and then hand out the ten grand. Now if you own the business, you can have the company pay and then instead of it being income on which you pay tax, it becomes an expense for the business.
    This kind of affect would have a strong partisan valence, as owners and proprietors are the most Republican occupational group in America by a wide margin.


    • Original article
    • Login or register to post comments
     

    Related

    • On Republican business-owners

      LAST week, my colleague at Democracy in America made an interesting argument about the political beliefs of business owners and the prospects for American recovery:

    • Hostess Brands: A Case Study in Government Burdens and Global (Un)competitiveness

      As most people know by now, Hostess Brands  -  the maker of such American junk food staples as Twinkies, Ding Dongs and Wonderbread - announced last week that it had failed to come to terms with the Bakery, Confectionery, Tobacco Workers and Grain Millers International Union and its 5000 striking members, and thus was entering Chapter 11 bankruptcy to unwind the company, sell off its assets and eliminate 18,500 US jobs.

    • You can tax the rich but it doesn’t mean they’ll pay

      Call it the supertax. It could be coming to a province near you, if you make enough money. Taxing the rich has become a popular tactic for political parties across the country and campaign fodder in more than one provincial election. But the wealthy have other ideas and are exploring tax shelters like never before, says Don Carson, partner in taxation at accounting and consultancy firm MNP LLP. As marginal rates go up, the Holy Grail of wealth management is to reduce taxable income.

    • Working On Saturday Feels Different When It's Your Own Business

      The air is just different owning business equity rather than earning a fixed income with a salary.  Can you smell it? I left Goldman in 2004 and have been downwardly mobile, career-wise, ever since.  I’ve also never been happier.

    • "Tax The Rich" Fallacy

      State comedians like to say "Let's tax the rich more!" They're missing an important point. The whole point of the State is to enable insiders to steal.Most insiders are negative taxpayers. The value of State subsidies is more than the value of any tax they pay. If someone is an insider and a negative taxpayer, there's no point raising their tax rate. If someone is negative taxpayer, the fact that they pay taxes is an illusion.Who decides how much a CEO gets paid?CEO: How much should I get paid?

    • In the Corporate Tax Race, America's Pulling Up the Rear

      Over the last year, I've frequently lamented the United States' increasingly absurd position on corporate taxes - maintaining one of the highest corporate tax rates in the world and routinely demonizing standard international business tax practices, while other countries (like Canada) are racing to eliminate tax burdens in order to enhance their domestic companies' global competitiveness.  Unfortunately, the last few weeks have produced a depressing cavalcade of similar news.

    • Business Executives Are Conservative

      I tweeted something yesterday about how despite what conservative businessmen may say, the macroeconomic forecasts they pay for are invariably powered by Keynesian (or, I guess, New Keynesian) models. That was really supposed to be a joke about how the real business cycle theories beloved of certain free market types have failed the market test, but I was surprised to discover substantial pushback on the idea that businessmen are generally conservative.

    • How to Play the Supreme Court's Corporate Funding Decision

      Jonathan Bernstein submits: No, the Supreme Court hasn’t ruled lately on these two issues to my knowledge, at least not directly. But unless you’ve been living in a cave, you know that last Thursday, the 21st, the Court struck down longstanding restrictions on corporations’ political campaign spending. The headline highlights some likely results.

    • The Business of Business in Washington

      The American Farm Bureau's vicious opposition to addressing climate change is a good example of the different biases that affect trade groups. When someone like the AFB blasts out an angry press release, there's a tendency to say that "farmers" are against something. But that's not always the case.

    Latest

    Amazon to Turn Fan Fiction into a Money Maker with Kindle Worlds
    Amazon to Turn Fan Fiction into a Money Maker...
    Paul George Makes A Crazy 29-Foot Shot To Force Overtime Against The Heat [Video]
    Paul George Makes A Crazy 29-Foot Shot To Force...

    User login

    • Create new account
    • Request new password
    • Click on the icon to sign in with your social network login or enter your Bullfax.com login

    Our Blog

    • ICBC/Goldman Sachs: farewell
    • Japan’s budget deficit, Rolls-Royce, Raytheon and Sony in Our Daily Round-Up for 05/22/2013
    • Apple chief Tim Cook defends tax practices and denies avoidance

    Markets Map

    Markets Map

    Follow Us

    Follow Us on Facebook, Twitter, Google Plus and RSS LinkedIn Facebook Twitter Google Plus RSS
    S&P 500: 1655.35 -0.83% FTSE: 6840.27 0.53% Nikk.: 15416.84 -1.36% DAX: 8530.89 0.69% HSI: 22880.58 -1.66% FX: EUR/GBP: 1.1702 USD/EUR: 1.2849 JPY/USD: 102.855 Commodities: Gold: 1367.95

    Bullfax.com - Market News & Analysis 2008-2011
    Contact Us | About Us | Terms & Conditions

    Follow Us on Facebook, Twitter, Google Plus and RSS LinkedIn Facebook Twitter Google Plus RSS .

    Secondary menu

    • Latest News
    • Top Rated
    • Most Popular
    • Archive
    • Discussions