Jump to Navigation
Home

Main menu

  • Home
  • News
  • Markets Map
  • Sentiments
  • Topics
  • Data
  • Comments
  • Images
  • Blog
  • About

Secondary menu

  • Latest News
  • Top Rated
  • Most Popular
  • Archive
  • Discussions
  • 26/5/2013: 'North' out, 'South' in?
  • AT&T: 'Administrating' Revenue Growth
  • Naxal attack: Sonia appreciates courage of leaders
  • Is Main Street Capital A Long-Term Buy?
  • Jet Airways may raise Rs 250 cr by 5% stake dilution
  • From Kimchi To Kiwi: 10 Bonds You've Never Heard Of
  • Rotana Hotels may invest $5 mn for Indian expansion
  • Why This Energy Stock Came In Second For My Portfolio
  • Buckeye Partners Performs And Yields Better Than Other...
  • Why It's Time To Sell DryShips

    Constructive Advice for The Left

    Fri, 12/03/2010 - 17:28 EDT - Mathew Yglesias
    • Comments
    • Ideology
    • uncat

    (cc photo by Infrogmation)
    Duncan Black complains:
    One thing that’s been true since I’ve been paying attention is that everything The Left does is wrong. By The Left I mean everyone to the left of the basic governing power. Third Parties are bad, sitting out elections are bad, putting pressure on elected reps is bad, protesting is bad, primary campaigns are bad, media criticism might hurt their feefees and is bad, saying mean things about Rush Limbaugh is bad, actually discussing your views honestly is bad, etc. Obviously the failure of The Left to take control and run the country does suggest that it is doing something wrong, but no one ever really offers much constructive advice other than…please STFU.
    I sympathize with this, but I also think the post is very typical of what’s wrong with “The Left” in this sense. What’s needed is less whining and more doing. Doing what? Doing politics, of course. That means that every time there’s an election you’re eligible to vote in—be it a primary election or a general election—you look at which are the two candidates most likely to win and you vote for the better one. And you encourage your friends and coworkers to do the same. You should donate money to the PACs of politicians who you like. You should volunteer in person to do election work near where you live. And you should donate money to organizations that you like. When there are issues being debated, you should write to your elected representatives. You should consider running for local office, and you should urge good people you might know to consider running. If you have local elected officials who you like, you should encourage them to run for higher office.
    At any rate, this is getting to be a long and boring list so I’ll stop. It’s dull because it’s obvious and it’s dull because participating constructively in politics is dull. As Max Weber said it’s like “the strong and slow boring of hard boards.” One strategy that works well for wealthy interest groups to is to spend money hiring other people to do a lot of the boring legwork. If you’re not a wealthy interest group, this is going to be hard to execute and you’re stuck with just doing a bunch of boring stuff yourself.
    The alternative, I guess, is that you could try a civil rights movement redux strategy. But that’s not “protests” it’s open defiance of the legal order, complete with subjecting yourself to massive violence by the state and by formal and informal terrorist organizations.


    • Original article
    • Login or register to post comments
     

    Related

    • What If They Gave an Election and Nobody Came

      Outgoing Manhattan District Attorney

    • The Madness of Partisan Municipal Elections

      I briefly noted this yesterday, but it turns out that state legislative outcomes are highly correlated with House of Representatives elections. For example:

    • The “I Dare You To Be Fiscally Responsible” Election

      The Washington Post’s Ruth Marcus is “despondent” about the victory of the Tea Party candidate (Christine O’Donnell) over the more moderate Republican candidate (incumbent congressman Mike Castle) in the primary for Delaware’s open U.S. Senate seat.  I agree that it’s bad news.  As Ruth explains:

    • Michael Bloomberg Scored A Major Win After Dumping $2 Million In An Illinois Primary Election

      CHICAGO (AP) — The newly elected Democratic nominee to replace disgraced former U.S. Rep. Jesse Jackson Jr. vowed to become a leader in the fight for federal gun control and directly challenged the National Rifle Association in her victory speech.

    • Congress's bipartisan regard for Wall Street money

    • Hate Mail Before and After Election; Wake-Up Call for Republican Party; Reflections on Extreme Polarization in US; Time to Move On; Rand Paul 2016

      A week has passed since the election. It's time to reflect on the polarization of America, hate mail, and what went wrong for the Republican party, all in a constructive way. Hate Mail Hate mail came pouring in to my inbox before and especially after the election. One person wrote a blazing "F U" email. I received some radical attacks regarding abortion. One person blamed me personally for the election results, in a rather threatening manner, (but ambiguous enough to make reporting it useless). Another blamed libertarians.

    • Far Right Costs Romney the Election; Mitt Romney, Rush Limbaugh, Are the Past; Late Deciders Break for Obama; Rasmussen Blows the Call

      People Believe What They Want to Believe Conventional wisdom says late deciders break against the incumbent. I said otherwise. I based my 90% likelihood of an Obama win on the notion that late deciders break in an unknown manner but in a big way. When the surge in support for Romney ended following the first debate, it was clear, at least in my mind, that the next momentum change, regardless of which way, was going to seal the fate.

    • Left vs right: out of date

      For me, this post of Tim’s raises a thought: could it be that much of the left and right are stuck in an out-dated mindset?

    • Duncan Smith's daft idea

      Iain Duncan Smith is doing a great job at the DWP - if DWP stands for Department of Witless Policies. His new wheeze is to offer “incentives” for people in social housing to move to where there are jobs. There are four issues here:

    • Crazy Politicians Through History

      Joe Klein writes about the rise of the crazy party:

    Latest

    Credit spreads are moderately attractive
    Credit spreads are moderately attractive
    Mystery Surrounding Collapse Of Hong Kong Mercantile Exchange Deepens; Four Arrested
    Mystery Surrounding Collapse Of Hong Kong...

    User login

    • Create new account
    • Request new password
    • Click on the icon to sign in with your social network login or enter your Bullfax.com login

    Our Blog

    • Tata Steel, ECB, China’s car market and European Corporate Tax in Our News for Today 05/24/2013
    • Pandora: the charm might fade away
    • Japanese Market, Indian Rupee, China’s Stocks and Oil Prices in Our Daily Round-Up for 05/23/2013

    Markets Map

    Markets Map

    Follow Us

    Follow Us on Facebook, Twitter, Google Plus and RSS LinkedIn Facebook Twitter Google Plus RSS
    S&P 500: 1649.60 -0.06% FTSE: 6654.34 -0.64% Nikk.: 14612.45 0.88% DAX: 8305.32 -0.56% HSI: 22618.67 -0.23% FX: EUR/GBP: 1.1694 USD/EUR: 1.2935 JPY/USD: 101.175 Commodities: Gold: 1386.60

    Bullfax.com - Market News & Analysis 2008-2011
    Contact Us | About Us | Terms & Conditions

    Follow Us on Facebook, Twitter, Google Plus and RSS LinkedIn Facebook Twitter Google Plus RSS .

    Secondary menu

    • Latest News
    • Top Rated
    • Most Popular
    • Archive
    • Discussions