Jump to Navigation
Home

Main menu

  • Home
  • News
  • Markets Map
  • Sentiments
  • Topics
  • Data
  • Comments
  • Images
  • Blog
  • About

Secondary menu

  • Latest News
  • Top Rated
  • Most Popular
  • Archive
  • Discussions
  • Mixed messages: Why women and men miscommunicate
  • Put-Write ETF Focuses On Income
  • An offering for religious understanding
  • The last to the party: Investors and flippers competing...
  • Shareholders and the dark art of gaming the tax system
  • Dodgy tax practices dog multinationals
  • Cisco Stepping On The Toes Of IBM And Hewlett-Packard
  • Atco’s Nancy Southern: A firm grip on the reins of the...
  • Saturday Papers
  • Green Gate Fire

    The challenges ahead for world oil

    Sun, 03/14/2010 - 10:35 EDT - EconBrowser
    • Comments
    • energy

    University of Leeds Professor Joyce Dargay and New York University Professor Dermot Gately have a new research paper suggesting that projections from the DOE, IEA, and OPEC are underestimating the challenges ahead for meeting world oil demand.

    Research by Baumeister and Peersman and Hughes, Knittel, and Sperling, among others, has documented that oil demand appears to have been much less responsive to price over the last decade than it had been in the 1970s. My recent study in the Brookings Papers on Economic Activity (published version here, working paper version here) concluded that this decrease in the elasticity is one of the key factors behind the oil-price run-up of 2007-2008. The surprise to markets in 2008 was that even $100 oil wouldn't be enough to prevent world demand from growing above 85 million barrels a day, and much more than 85 million barrels a day simply wasn't going to be produced at that time.

    Dargay and Gately's new paper notes how different the recent experience was from the past:

    compare two decades in
    which the price of crude oil has quintupled: 1973-84 and 1998-2008. After the price increases of the
    1970's, per-capita demand fell by 19% for the OECD and by 13% for the world as a whole. In the past
    decade, with oil price increases similar to those of the 1970's, per-capita demand fell only 3% in the
    OECD; worldwide it actually increased, by 4%.

    The authors note that the overall responsiveness of oil demand to the price increases of the 1970s masks some very different developments. While there were substantial reductions in OECD use of oil for non-transportation purposes, changes in transportation demand and demand outside the OECD were much more modest.

    Source: Dargay and Gately (2010)

    gately1.gif

    Those trends are even more dramatic when you look at the numbers in per capita terms.

    Source: Dargay and Gately (2010)

    gately2.gif

    Dargay and Gately conclude:

    The factors most responsible for reducing demand
    since 1971 cannot be repeated. Almost all the low-hanging
    fruit has now been picked; it cannot be picked
    again. The OECD has already done the easy fuel-switching,
    away from oil used in electricity generation
    and space heating.

    The authors' inference is not an optimistic one:

    If annual per-capita oil demand growth rates to 2030 were assumed to be held zero in the OECD, 1% in
    the [former Soviet Union], and at its 1971-2008 historical rate (2.54% annually) in the rest of the world, total oil demand
    will be 138 mbd in 2030-- about 30 mbd greater than what is projected by DOE, IEA, and OPEC.

    If you have a plan for how the world might produce 138 mbd, I'd like to hear it. If not, the challenges of 2007-2008 will return with a vengeance.

    Transportation adjustments will be the key. Trying to make more use of natural gas as a transportation fuel should be a high priority for the United States.

    • Original article
    • Login or register to post comments
     

    Related

    • Could monetary policy mitigate the real effects of oil shocks?

      Michael Levi (hat tip:Marginal Revolution) and Jeremy Kahn are among those who recently rediscovered some earlier research by Ben Bernanke and others that concluded that the economic downturns that followed historical oil price shocks could have been avoided if the Fed had followed a more expansionary monetary

    • The first oil shock

      A research paper by Eyal Dvir of Boston College and Ken Rogoff of Harvard suggests some interesting parallels between the recent behavior of oil prices and what was observed at the very beginning of the industry. I've been doing some related research on the history of the oil industry that looks into the events behind historical oil price shocks. Here I describe the first oil shock, which occurred a century and a half ago.

    • Drilling for more oil in your fuel tank

      North America’s shale fields are the most visible symbol of the energy revolution, but they tell less than half the story. An even bigger transformation is taking place in the engines and fuel tanks of cars and trucks across the United States. High oil prices, recession and tougher fuel economy standards have combined to cut 5.5 million barrels per day from projected U.S. oil consumption in 2020, according to an analysis of forecasts published in recent years by the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA).

    • Top forecasters cut 2013 oil demand growth estimates

      The world’s top oil forecasters this week all cut their 2013 oil demand forecasts due to subdued economic growth, with the figures showing increasing similarity in the views of producers and consumers. The International Energy Agency (IEA) on Thursday trimmed its global oil demand growth estimate, which followed similar moves by the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) and the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC).

    • A New Spin on the Oil War

      One of the main stories not being told about today’s oil market is the next round of turbulence set for the Middle East. It’s the oil war scenario, but with a new spin. Last year when Byron King and I attended the Platts Crude Oil Conference, a main takeaway was an interesting OPEC break-even chart that shows how much money OPEC nations need to keep their governments funded. Take a look:

    • The Declining Price Elasticity of Gas

      From Alexander Hart at TNR’s nifty new “The Study” blog:

    • OPEC cannot sustain high oil prices forever

      OPEC’s influence on oil prices is very visible in the short run, but it is less certain that its pricing power can be maintained in the long term, according to a thoughtful review published by Bassam Fattouh and Lavan Mahadeva of the Oxford Institute for Energy Studies. Fattouh and Mahadeva examine how the cartel’s strategy and power over oil prices have varied over time depending on market conditions and the interaction among OPEC members (“OPEC: What Difference Has it Made?” Jan 2013).

    • Fracking threatens OPEC as U.S. oil output hits 20-year high

      A surge in U.S. oil production has pushed the country’s output to the highest level since 1992, threatening the dominance of the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries. The U.S. pumped 7.06 million barrels a day in the week ended Feb. 8, up 1 percent from the previous week and extending last year’s 19 percent gain, the Energy Information Administration said today. OPEC production fell to the lowest level in a year in January, the Paris-based International Energy Agency said today in its monthly report.

    • So Much for Peak Demand... Try 134mb/d by 2030

      Eamon Keane submits:"So much for peak demand - try 134mb/d by 2030." That was the startling conclusion dispatched from the ivory tower recently by Joyce Dargay, a British transport econometrics professor, and Dermot Gately, an American economics professor. I'll present their conclusions and then discuss the implications.

    Latest

    The last to the party: Investors and flippers competing for small amount of inventory.
    The last to the party: Investors and flippers...
    Forget Prayer, It's Lamb Slaughter Time: A Rational Man's Response To All Time High Gold Shorts
    Forget Prayer, It's Lamb Slaughter Time: A...

    User login

    • Create new account
    • Request new password
    • Click on the icon to sign in with your social network login or enter your Bullfax.com login

    Our Blog

    • Tata Steel, ECB, China’s car market and European Corporate Tax in Our News for Today 05/24/2013
    • Pandora: the charm might fade away
    • Japanese Market, Indian Rupee, China’s Stocks and Oil Prices in Our Daily Round-Up for 05/23/2013

    Markets Map

    Markets Map

    Follow Us

    Follow Us on Facebook, Twitter, Google Plus and RSS LinkedIn Facebook Twitter Google Plus RSS
    S&P 500: 1649.60 -0.06% FTSE: 6654.34 -0.64% Nikk.: 14612.45 0.88% DAX: 8305.32 -0.56% HSI: 22618.67 -0.23% FX: EUR/GBP: 1.1694 USD/EUR: 1.2935 JPY/USD: 101.175 Commodities: Gold: 1386.60

    Bullfax.com - Market News & Analysis 2008-2011
    Contact Us | About Us | Terms & Conditions

    Follow Us on Facebook, Twitter, Google Plus and RSS LinkedIn Facebook Twitter Google Plus RSS .

    Secondary menu

    • Latest News
    • Top Rated
    • Most Popular
    • Archive
    • Discussions