Jump to Navigation
Home

Main menu

  • Home
  • News
  • Markets Map
  • Sentiments
  • Topics
  • Data
  • Comments
  • Images
  • Blog
  • About

Secondary menu

  • Latest News
  • Top Rated
  • Most Popular
  • Archive
  • Discussions
  • U.S., China Set Pact on Auditor Access
  • Wockhardt crashes 30% in 3 days, brokerages slash target...
  • Asia stocks extend losses after big sell-off
  • U.S., China Set Pact on Auditor Access
  • Tokyo Shares End Higher
  • Wolf Richter: Government By Eurocrats: The Olive-Oil...
  • Google, like Facebook, in talks to buy Waze for $1 bn
  • GFA invests Rs 40 crore in its India operations
  • Futures Movers: Oil futures below $94, on track for...
  • Culture of innovation at RSP Engineering Shops

    Catholic Health Association Head Backs Reform

    Mon, 03/15/2010 - 09:58 EDT - Mathew Yglesias
    • Abortion
    • Comments
    • health care
    • uncat

    Stethoscope
    One of the real oddities of Bart Stupak’s refusal to get back on board the health reform train is that virtually everyone who looks at the current language thinks it’s close to Stupak’s own language, and basically achieves what Stupak says is his goal—avoiding taxpayer subsidies of abortion. The people who agree with Stupak are overwhelmingly conservative reform opponents, who are casting about for things to object to. People who want to see health coverage expanded, including anti-abortion Catholics, generally don’t see things Stupak’s way.
    As Carol Keehan, President and CEO of the Catholic Health Association, explains:
    CHA has a major concern on life issues. We said there could not be any federal funding for abortions and there had to be strong funding for maternity care, especially for vulnerable women. The bill now being considered allows people buying insurance through an exchange to use federal dollars in the form of tax credits and their own dollars to buy a policy that covers their health care. If they choose a policy with abortion coverage, then they must write a separate personal check for the cost of that coverage.
    There is a requirement that the insurance companies be audited annually to assure that the payment for abortion coverage fully covers the administrative and clinical costs, that the payment is held in a separate account from other premiums, and that there are no federal dollars used.
    Now, obviously, a lot of people, including Bart Stupak, think abortion should be illegal and this bill doesn’t do that. But it does ensure that you can only get an abortion with private funds.
    What’s more:
    The insurance reforms will make the lives of millions more secure, and their coverage more affordable. [...]
    In addition, there is a wonderful provision in the bill that provides $250 million over 10 years to pay for counseling, education, job training and housing for vulnerable women who are pregnant or parenting. Another provision provides a substantial increase in the adoption tax credit and funding for adoption assistance programs.
    Obviously both Stupak and the US Conference of Catholic Bishops are entitled to make up their own minds. But Keehan is not just a Catholic, but her organization—unlike the Biships—has actually expertise in health care administration and finance.


    • Original article
    • Login or register to post comments
     

    Related

    • Why does Third Way oppose the Stupak amendment?

      Third Way is a centrist Democratic group that's generally associated with calls for Democrats to compromise on divisive cultural issues, not aggressive efforts to reject compromises on divisive cultural issues. So their angry report on the Stupak compromise caught my eye. I called Rachel Laser, one of the report's co-authors, to discuss it. Your report says that the Stupak amendment violates the principle of “abortion neutrality.” What is “abortion neutrality?”

    • A very bad deal to pass a very good bill

    • Real Talk on Health Care and Abortion

      What Theda Skocpol said:

    • National Catholic Report Supports Health Reform

    • Senate skeptical of Stupak amendment

      Planned Parenthood just blasted out a roundup of senators who have voiced doubts about the Stupak amendment. It's a more impressive, and moderate, list than I would have guessed:

    • How Stupak's amendment could change the whole insurance market

      Brian Beutler has a good post assessing the Stupak amendment's likely impact on the exchanges. "It is safe to say," he concludes, "that the vast majority of, if not all, women in the exchanges will not be allowed to have abortion coverage in their benefits packages."

    • False Hope and the Stupak Amendment

      One reason private health insurance tends to cover abortions is that having an abortion is a lot cheaper than having a baby. Consequently, it kinda sorta seems like the Stupak Amendment might have a limited practical impact. Thus I’ve had thoughts along the lines of this from Mark Kleiman:

    • Nuns Break With Bishops, Back Health Reform

      Party discipline breaking down inside the Catholic Church:

    • The Abortion Holdout

      Ben Nelson doesn’t come in for as much scorn as some of his Senate colleagues since he’s never pretend to be anything other than an unusually conservative Democrat and since Nebraska has been a consistently reactionary state for many, many, many decades.

    • Bishops and Abortion

      Scott Lemieux wrote yesterday:

    Latest

    Veteran fears 'beginning of the end' for Japan as bond market buckles
    Veteran fears 'beginning of the end'...
    IRS Scandal: Who Knew What When?
    IRS Scandal: Who Knew What When?

    User login

    • Create new account
    • Request new password
    • Click on the icon to sign in with your social network login or enter your Bullfax.com login

    Our Blog

    • Pandora: the charm might fade away
    • Japanese Market, Indian Rupee, China’s Stocks and Oil Prices in Our Daily Round-Up for 05/23/2013
    • IMF calls on Osborne to spend on infrastructure

    Markets Map

    Markets Map

    Follow Us

    Follow Us on Facebook, Twitter, Google Plus and RSS LinkedIn Facebook Twitter Google Plus RSS
    S&P 500: 1650.51 -0.29% FTSE: 6696.79 -2.14% Nikk.: 14612.45 0.88% DAX: 8351.98 -2.14% HSI: 22651.33 -0.08% FX: EUR/GBP: 1.1674 USD/EUR: 1.2935 JPY/USD: 101.6495 Commodities: Gold: 1390.20

    Bullfax.com - Market News & Analysis 2008-2011
    Contact Us | About Us | Terms & Conditions

    Follow Us on Facebook, Twitter, Google Plus and RSS LinkedIn Facebook Twitter Google Plus RSS .

    Secondary menu

    • Latest News
    • Top Rated
    • Most Popular
    • Archive
    • Discussions