Jump to Navigation
Home

Main menu

  • Home
  • News
  • Markets Map
  • Sentiments
  • Topics
  • Data
  • Comments
  • Images
  • Blog
  • About

Secondary menu

  • Latest News
  • Top Rated
  • Most Popular
  • Archive
  • Discussions
  • Get a Job Offer from a Stranger
  • The Children's Place Retail Stores Management...
  • Exposure To Country Risk: The Coeur Mining Edition
  • People Are Outraged Over 'Ghetto' Tours In The...
  • Going gets tougher for TD as mortgage lending slows
  • BLANKFEIN: Don't Worry, Goldman Isn't Giving Up...
  • Sales gains lift Dollar Tree's 1Q profit 15 pct
  • Tim Cook Reignites Case to Buy Apple: Schoenberger
  • Weimaresque Hyperinflation Is Ravaging One Of The World...
  • Venture capital short on love in bull run

    Capital Controls Increase Monetary Policy Autonomy

    Thu, 03/24/2011 - 14:30 EDT - Mathew Yglesias
    • Comments
    • Financial Regulation
    • monetary policy
    • uncat

    I saw a Tyler Cowen link to a paper under the text “Are capital controls actually effective?” I assumed the conclusion of the paper must be that they’re not. But actually it seems to me that Nicolas Magud, Carmen M Reinhart, and Kenneth Rogoff are finding that capital controls have some important effects. Specifically, controls on capital inflows:
    — Make monetary policy more independent,
    — Alter the composition of capital flows, and
    — Reduce real exchange rate pressures (although the evidence on the latter is more controversial).
    — Do not reduce the volume of net flows (and hence the current-account balance).
    The question facing policymakers is whether the distorting effect of altering the composition of capital flows is a bigger deal than the increased ability to fight recessions. Presumably the question “at what margin?” is relevant here. But this seems like a very relevant consideration.


    • Original article
    • Login or register to post comments
     

    Related

    • Capital controls: A meta-analysis approach

      Nicolas Magud, Carmen M Reinhart, Kenneth Rogoff, 24 March 2011Capital controls are back on the table. But the existing literature offers conflicting and sometimes confusing insights. This column provides a meta-analysis of 37 empirical studies with the aim of exposing some common ground.

    • Reinhart-Rogoff and Herndon-Ash-Pollin: a few further comments

      I made some comments on Sunday about a recent critique by Thomas Herndon, Michael Ash, and Robert Pollin of an influential 2010 paper by Carmen Reinhart and Kenneth Rogoff. Yesterday Econbrowser hosted a reply from Pollin and Ash to my remarks.

    • Yuan Appreciation: Do Chinese Trade Flows Behave Differently? (I)

      China is in the news; or more accurately, the Chinese currency, isFrom Reuters: A sharp rise in China's yuan currency might cut the U.S.

    • Math in a Time of Excel: Economists' Error Undermines Influential Paper

      Filed under: Budgeting & Planning, Debt, Economizer

    • Math in a Time of Excel: Economists' Error Undermines Influential Paper

      Filed under: Budgeting & Planning, Debt, Economizer

    • Math in a Time of Excel: Economists' Error Undermines Influential Paper

      Filed under: Budgeting & Planning, Debt, Economizer

    • Exchange Rates as a Monetary Policy Target

      David Romer’s reflections on macroeconomics after the crisis are excellent, but I didn’t understand one sub-point here about monetary policy:

    • Reinhart: "This is not something that policymakers can undo quickly."

      In their book “This Time is Different,” Carmen Reinhart and Kenneth Rogoff construct the richest and most detailed history of financial crises that anyone has developed. Their data set covers 66 countries, five continents and eight centuries, and gives them an unparalleled ability to see patterns and predictors among different types of crashes. And see them they do. I spoke to Reinhart on Wednesday about the speed of the recovery, why financial crises are different from normal recessions and what, if anything, can be done. An edited transcript follows.

    • Rogoff and Reinhart should show some remorse and reconsider austerity | Heidi Moore

    • Mike Konczal: Reinhart-Rogoff a Week Later: Why Does This Matter?

      Mike Konczal: Reinhart-Rogoff a Week Later: Why Does This Matter?: Well this is progress. We are seeing distancing by conservative writers on the Reinhart/Rogoff thesis. In Feburary, Douglas Holtz-Eakin wrote:

    Latest

    ‘Canada taking a step backwards’: Decriminalize hard drugs to fight addiction, B.C. report says
    ‘Canada taking a step backwards’: Decriminalize...
    Europe Had A Horrific Day
    Europe Had A Horrific Day

    User login

    • Create new account
    • Request new password
    • Click on the icon to sign in with your social network login or enter your Bullfax.com login

    Our Blog

    • Pandora: the charm might fade away
    • Japanese Market, Indian Rupee, China’s Stocks and Oil Prices in Our Daily Round-Up for 05/23/2013
    • IMF calls on Osborne to spend on infrastructure

    Markets Map

    Markets Map

    Follow Us

    Follow Us on Facebook, Twitter, Google Plus and RSS LinkedIn Facebook Twitter Google Plus RSS
    S&P 500: 1648.52 -0.41% FTSE: 6696.79 -2.14% Nikk.: 14483.98 -7.89% DAX: 8351.98 -2.14% HSI: 22669.68 -2.61% FX: EUR/GBP: 1.1675 USD/EUR: 1.295 JPY/USD: 101.645 Commodities: Gold: 1385.20

    Bullfax.com - Market News & Analysis 2008-2011
    Contact Us | About Us | Terms & Conditions

    Follow Us on Facebook, Twitter, Google Plus and RSS LinkedIn Facebook Twitter Google Plus RSS .

    Secondary menu

    • Latest News
    • Top Rated
    • Most Popular
    • Archive
    • Discussions