Jump to Navigation
Home

Main menu

  • Home
  • News
  • Markets Map
  • Sentiments
  • Topics
  • Data
  • Comments
  • Images
  • Blog
  • About

Secondary menu

  • Latest News
  • Top Rated
  • Most Popular
  • Archive
  • Discussions
  • UAE: Central Bank of the UAE looks to draft legislations...
  • GLOBAL: Malaysia's central bank governor calls for...
  • Just Dial IPO: Why investors should subscribe | Avoid
  • UAE: Barclays appoints Haidar Hammoud as head of wealth...
  • SAC Capital's Cohen gets subpoena to testify: NY...
  • Gearing for world without PCs
  • Analysis: Shrinking deficit reduces pressure for budget...
  • Unreal Footage Of The Tornadoes That Swept Through The...
  • China's property market continues to heat up
  • Insight: The road to a greener America is littered with...

    Afghans to Be Shocked, Awed By Novel Experience of Heavy Military Equipment, Explosions

    Fri, 11/19/2010 - 12:29 EDT - Mathew Yglesias
    • Afghanistan
    • Comments
    • National Security
    • uncat


    It’s a bit difficult to know what the most ridiculous thing the US military told Rajiv Chandrasekaran as he was worked on this piece about America’s increasing use of tanks in Afghanistan. The ironic invocation of shock and awe sets the table nicely:
    “The tanks bring awe, shock and firepower,” the officer said. “It’s pretty significant.”
    But for my money, what brings the piece home is this novel rationale for blowing things up:
    “Why do you have to blow up so many of our fields and homes?” a farmer from the Arghandab district asked a top NATO general at a recent community meeting.
    Although military officials are apologetic in public, they maintain privately that the tactic has a benefit beyond the elimination of insurgent bombs. By making people travel to the district governor’s office to submit a claim for damaged property, “in effect, you’re connecting the government to the people,” the senior officer said.
    That’s the deepest into the black humor, at least. But what really leaves me scratching my head is what Spencer Ackerman points to here, where General David Petraeus seems to endorse bizarre ideas about his own magical powers:
    Chandrasekaran reports that Petraeus feels his reputation as a counterinsurgency guru can overcome the optics of a heavily armored force rolling through Afghanistan’s south, reminiscent of the Soviet occupation. But any reporter who spends time in Afghanistan will hear stories from surprised U.S. officers about how many Afghans don’t know the Soviets ever actually left. And chances are the Army/Marine Counterinsurgency Field Manual isn’t required reading in Kandahar or Marja.
    It continually seems to me that the biggest problem with our strategy in Afganistan is that to much too great extent it’s really a problem about internal conflicts within the military whose real targets are in Washington DC. The counterinsurgency faction badly wants something called a “win” achieved through something called “counterinsurgency” and I think is losing sight of the real interests of the people in America and Afghanistan alike.


    • Original article
    • Login or register to post comments
     

    Related

    • Counterinsurgency Is Constantly Succeeding Despite Lack of Visible Examples of Success

    • Britain Blasts Claim That Prince Harry Hunts Afghans While 'Drunk'

      The Ministry of Defence has dismissed claims by an Afghan warlord that Prince Harry kills insurgents while "drunk" as simply absurd. Gulbuddin Hekmatyar, a former Afghan prime minister, told the Daily Telegraph that Prince Harry, an Apache attack helicopter pilot, was intoxicated as he killed "innocent Afghans".

    • Irony in Afghanistan

      I really don’t understand this argument Richard Fontaine and John Nagl about why a stolen election in Afghanistan doesn’t undermine the case for a counterinsurgency strategy:

    • Petraeus and Karzai

      Joshua Partlow and Karen DeYoung report that General David Petraeus is none too happy with Afghan President Hamid Karzai:

    • Soviet History

      Here’s an interesting overview from Steve Coll about the later years of the Soviet mission in Afghanistan:

    • Missing War Records Are Complicating Benefit Claims For Veterans

      A strange thing happened when Christopher DeLara filed for disability benefits after his tour in Iraq: The U.S. Army said it had no records showing he had ever been overseas. DeLara had searing memories of his combat experiences. A friend bled to death before his eyes. He saw an insurgent shoot his commander in the head.

    • Phony Counterinsurgency Is Dead, Long Live Real Counterinsurgency?

    • Women’s Rights and Afghanistan

    • If You Build It, Will They Maintain It?

      In its largest reconstruction effort since the Marshall Plan, the United States government has spent $53 billion for relief and reconstruction in Iraq since the 2003 invasion, building tens of thousands of hospitals, water treatment plants, electricity substations, schools and bridges. But there are growing concerns among American officials that Iraq will not be able to adequately maintain the facilities once the Americans have left, potentially wasting hundreds of millions of dollars and jeopardizing Iraq’s ability to provide basic services to its people.

    • Afghanistan Reading Assignment

      I’ve resolved to try to start following the Afghanistan debate more closely now and asked Spencer Ackerman for some reading recommendations. He gave me: — Rory Stewart, “The Irresistible Illusion” The London Review of Books. — Gilles Dorronsoro, “The Taliban’s Winning Strategy in Afghanistan” for the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.

    Latest

    Israel seeks interim peace deal, says Palestinians ‘still not psychologically ready for an agreement’
    Israel seeks interim peace deal, says...
    Here Are All The Billboard Music Awards Winners
    Here Are All The Billboard Music Awards Winners

    User login

    • Create new account
    • Request new password
    • Click on the icon to sign in with your social network login or enter your Bullfax.com login

    Our Blog

    • Aviva steps up drive for cost cuts
    • Food Demand, JM Financial, UK Startups Incubator and Sina in Our News for Today 05/17/2013
    • Budget black hole at heart of George Osborne’s finances

    Markets Map

    Markets Map

    Follow Us

    Follow Us on Facebook, Twitter, Google Plus and RSS LinkedIn Facebook Twitter Google Plus RSS
    S&P 500: 1667.47 1.02% FTSE: 6723.06 0.52% Nikk.: 15348.61 1.37% DAX: 8398.00 0.33% HSI: 23470.52 1.65% FX: EUR/GBP: 1.183 USD/EUR: 1.2847 JPY/USD: 102.635 Commodities: Gold: 1345.20

    Bullfax.com - Market News & Analysis 2008-2011
    Contact Us | About Us | Terms & Conditions

    Follow Us on Facebook, Twitter, Google Plus and RSS LinkedIn Facebook Twitter Google Plus RSS .

    Secondary menu

    • Latest News
    • Top Rated
    • Most Popular
    • Archive
    • Discussions