Jump to Navigation
Home

Main menu

  • Home
  • News
  • Markets Map
  • Sentiments
  • Topics
  • Data
  • Comments
  • Images
  • Blog
  • About

Secondary menu

  • Latest News
  • Top Rated
  • Most Popular
  • Archive
  • Discussions
  • CHART OF THE DAY: The Long View Of Amazon (AMZN)
  • H7N9 Is More Adapted To Spread Among Humans Than Other...
  • America's Hottest CEOs Are Devoting More Time Than...
  • Analysis: Markets face rough summer ride as Fed pullback...
  • Chart Of The "Keynesian Normal": America's...
  • 'Finance, petro ministry pushing up KG-D6 prices...
  • Bull Of The Day: Flowers Foods
  • 4 Market Risks Worth Worrying About
  • Dish Secures $9 Billion in Financing for Sprint Bid
  • Bringing Skepticism (and Math) to Electric Vehicle Fuel...

    The “L” Word: Is lobbying actually a sign of progress in developing countries?

    Mon, 11/29/2010 - 20:38 EDT - PSD Blog
    • Business environment
    • corporate governance
    • corruption
    • RDF10

    Conventional wisdom holds that bribery is the preferred means of influencing government policy in less developed countries, while lobbying is more common in developed countries. Perhaps due to this perceived compartmentalization of lobbying and bribery, very little is known about the relationship between lobbying and bribery, the extent and effectiveness of lobbying vs. bribery in less developed countries, and how this relationship changes as countries move up the development ladder.
    The complexity of the issue makes for a challenging research agenda. Take for example the first point—the relationship between lobbying and bribery. One view is that lobbying is aimed at changing the law in to favor the lobbyists, thus decreasing bribery. However, another view is that lobbying is not done in order to change the rules favorably, thus making bribing unnecessary, but rather to persuade politicians to underinvest in law enforcement, thus making bribing easier. In this view, lobbying and bribery increase in tandem. Which of these two views is correct in a given situation and does the answer vary with the underlying political structure?

    A recent study by Campos and Giovannoni (2007) in the journal Public Choice attempts to address some of the issues mentioned above. While there are some data limitations with this study, the results are worth pondering. Using data on 25 transition countries in Eastern Europe and Central Asia collected by the World Bank (Enterprise Surveys, BEEPS), the study finds that:
    (1)  There is substantial lobbying by firms—about 24 percent of the firms engaged in lobbying activity, ranging from 6 percent in Azerbaijan to 77 percent in Hungary.
    (2)  Lobbying activity increases—and quite sharply—with higher levels of GDP per capita.
    (3)  Lobbying and bribing are found to move in opposite directions. That is, lobbying substitutes for bribery.
    (4)  Lobbying appears to be much more effective than bribery in influencing policy.
    (5)  Political stability, a parliamentary vs. presidential system and various firm characteristics have a strong effect on firms’ decision to engage in lobbying.
    These findings suggest that lobbying is not just a rich-country phenomenon. It is already present in at least some of the less developed countries and is slowly replacing bribery as a means of influencing government policies. The pace is likely to increase as the less developed countries continue their onward march towards higher income levels. Let’s hope that development economists start paying greater attention to lobbying—its determinants, effects and harmonization with the broader political objectives of the country.

    • Original article
    • Login or register to post comments
     

    Related

    • Unofficial payments, barriers to trade, and other obstacles to running a business in Azerbaijan

      By: Mohammad Amin and Arvind Jain

    • Eastern Europe Financial House Stronger than Debt-Ridden Neighbors

      For some Eastern European investors, the geographic proximity to the eurozone has been too close for comfort, with the Russian MICEX Index declining about 20 percent year-to-date. However, stronger fiscal and monetary stances in Eastern Europe compared with its western neighbors warrant a second look.

    • Guest Contribution: "Inflation Responses to Commodity Price Shocks – How and Why Do Countries Differ?"

      Today, we are fortunate to have a guest contribution from Gaston Gelos, Advisor in the IMF’s Institute for Capacity Development, and Yulia Ustyugova, Economist in the IMF’s Western Hemisphere Department. Commodity prices have been particularly volatile during the last decade. They set off on a multi-year rally around 2003, peaked in 2008, plummeted with the global recession, recovered quickly, and surprised recently with renewed surges.

    • Weak Regional Manufacturing Surveys: Philly Fed, NY Fed, Dallas Fed; Don't Blame Hurricane Sandy

      Let's take a look at the latest Fed regional economic surveys to catch a glimpse at current business conditions. Philly Region Back in Contraction The November 2012 Philadelphia Business Outlook Survey is back in negative territory. Indicators Suggest Diminished Activity

    • Laying a Foundation to Double Our Exports, Increase Competitiveness

      Today Secretary Locke wrote an op-ed posted in The Hill with a focus on how the administration and the Commerce Department are working to increase America's global competitiveness and create U.S. jobs by selling more American-made goods and services around the world.Cross posted at The Hill**********As 2011 begins, the American economy is stronger than at any time since the Great Recession began in December 2007.Retail sales just had their strongest quarterly gain since 2001. Private sector employment grew every single month in 2010, with the manufacturing sector posting its first increase in annual employment since 1997.These are strong indications that the steps President Obama took to foster economic recovery are working — beginning with the Recovery Act and continuing through the December 2010 tax-cut package.But that’s not to suggest that anyone within the administration or the Commerce Department is satisfied — not with unemployment still over 9 percent.As we move forward, policymakers should remember that the most important contest is not between Democrats and Republicans, but between America and countries around the world that are competing like never before for the jobs and industries of the future.Making the U.S. more competitive will require us to focus on two things: supercharging innovation and selling more American-made goods and services around the world, so that U.S. firms can hire more workers and reinvest in the research and development they need to keep growing.Although the private sector will take the lead on innovation, we can’t forget that the government has always had an important, supportive role to play, and the Commerce Department is engaged in a variety of areas.

    • The Washington Post Makes A Major Factual Error

       By Simon Johnson, co-author of 13 Bankers Of all the weak, ill-informed, and misleading pieces written on the “resolution authority” – a central tenet of the Dodd bill – by far the most disappointing is the Washington Post editorial in Sunday’s paper. I fully appreciate that these are complex issues and I understand that journalists frequently write under great time pressure. 

    • The complexity problem

      Earlier in the crisis, the line was that "too big to fail" was too big to exist. I'm coming around to an altogether more radical view: What if "too complex to understand" is too complex to exist?

    • “Change In Challenging Times: A Plan For Extending And Improving Health Coverage”

      It turns out that all the various delays involved in getting comprehensive health reform passed have an upside: The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act will be signed into law on precisely the five-year anniversary of the day “Change In Challenging Times: A Plan For Extending And Improving Health Coverage” by Jeanne M. Lambrew, John D. Podesta, and Teresa L. Shaw was published in Health Affairs.

    • The Value of (Not Having) the Public Plan

      This guest post was written by Arindrajit Dube, an economist at UC Berkeley Institute for Research on Labor and Employment who is joining the Department of Economics at the University of Massachusetts, Amherst. His work focuses on labor and health economics topics, as well as political economy.

    Latest

    Chart Of The "Keynesian Normal": America's Tragic Divergence
    Chart Of The "Keynesian Normal":...
    CHART OF THE DAY: The Long View Of Amazon (AMZN)
    CHART OF THE DAY: The Long View Of Amazon (AMZN)

    User login

    • Create new account
    • Request new password
    • Click on the icon to sign in with your social network login or enter your Bullfax.com login

    Our Blog

    • Pandora: the charm might fade away
    • Japanese Market, Indian Rupee, China’s Stocks and Oil Prices in Our Daily Round-Up for 05/23/2013
    • IMF calls on Osborne to spend on infrastructure

    Markets Map

    Markets Map

    Follow Us

    Follow Us on Facebook, Twitter, Google Plus and RSS LinkedIn Facebook Twitter Google Plus RSS
    S&P 500: 1650.51 -0.29% FTSE: 6696.79 -2.14% Nikk.: 14483.98 -7.89% DAX: 8351.98 -2.14% HSI: 22669.68 -2.61% FX: EUR/GBP: 1.1682 USD/EUR: 1.2933 JPY/USD: 101.955 Commodities: Gold: 1392.40

    Bullfax.com - Market News & Analysis 2008-2011
    Contact Us | About Us | Terms & Conditions

    Follow Us on Facebook, Twitter, Google Plus and RSS LinkedIn Facebook Twitter Google Plus RSS .

    Secondary menu

    • Latest News
    • Top Rated
    • Most Popular
    • Archive
    • Discussions